Difference between revisions of "Security issue: Ram raid"

From Securipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 35: Line 35:
   
 
== Impacts ==
 
== Impacts ==
  +
===Mobility impact===
  +
A location or building has a higher risk for ram raid when it is easily accessible by large trucks. In order to prevent ram raids, locations which are more likely to suffer from ram raids (banks etc.) could be protected against ram raid by making it less accessible to large trucks. However, that would have an impact of the mobility and [[accessibility]] in general of that area. For example, one could lower the accessibility of a street for large trucks by putting a barrier on a certain height which allows person cars but not larger trucks or buses, or by making the street narrower. That would also have an impact on the accessibility of e.g. normal public transport (buses) or delivery of goods to shops with trucks. This can be an undesirable side effect of such measures on mobility.
  +
 
===Economic impact===
 
===Economic impact===
 
Ram raids lead to considerable costs in both a direct ([[Economic effects of crime#Primary economic impact of crime|primary]]) and a indirect ([[Economic effects of crime#Secondary economic impact of crime|secondary]]) way<ref>Primary economic impact (or direct effects) are generally defined as the initial, immediate economic output generated by a specific cause (in this case a criminal offence). Secondary economic impact (or indirect effects) are generated each time a subsequent transaction is made, for example, the impact of crime on the real estate value in the neighbourhood.</ref>. Direct costs of ram raids come in the form of:
 
Ram raids lead to considerable costs in both a direct ([[Economic effects of crime#Primary economic impact of crime|primary]]) and a indirect ([[Economic effects of crime#Secondary economic impact of crime|secondary]]) way<ref>Primary economic impact (or direct effects) are generally defined as the initial, immediate economic output generated by a specific cause (in this case a criminal offence). Secondary economic impact (or indirect effects) are generated each time a subsequent transaction is made, for example, the impact of crime on the real estate value in the neighbourhood.</ref>. Direct costs of ram raids come in the form of:

Revision as of 19:15, 11 February 2013

Results of a ram raid

Ram raid is a particular technique for burglars to gain access to primarily commercial premises, by means of driving -usually stolen- vehicles into locked or closed entrances, exits or windows.

Description

This act has occurred since at least the mid 1930s. The term came into widespread use after a series of such raids in Belfast in 1979 that was covered in news reports and in countries such as Australia that inspired a series of similar crimes.

[1]Notably, large trucks are used to break into technology companies and steal high-value equipment for resale on the black market.

Out of town retail parks and industrial parks are often targets due to their largely deserted nature after day time business hours, together with the relatively high-value products often on sale (e.g. electronics).

In recent years, ram raiding with excavators/diggers to target ATM machines, has risen significantly[2].

Contributing circumstances

Known circumstances to influence the likelihood or effect of burglary, are presented in the table below:

Contributing Circumstance Influence Description
Lack of surveillance. Decreases risk of detection. A low level of surveillance, particularly round-the-clock surveillance, decreases the perceived risk of detection for a perpetrator and thereby increases the attractiveness.
High levels of ram-raid in the vicinity. Increases likelihood of targeting. The distance to known places where offenders live matters. On average, burglars travel 2,6 km to commit their crimes[3] and the odds of a neighbourhood’s being chosen increases by a factor of 1.67 for every kilometre closer to the burglar’s home it is located[4].
High levels of unemployment Increases likelihood of targetting High levels of unemployment are associated with higher levels of burglary[5]. In fact a study showed that increased unemployment in one year predicted increased violence in the next year[6].
Location near access route or in suburban area
Presence of ATMs or (atttractive) shops

Socio-economic circumstances

Although there is no real scientific consensus with respect to the causal relationship between the socio-economic background and property crime like robberies or (ram)raids, Australian research, for example, illustrates that long term unemployment amongst young male adolescents has a substantial effect on property crime rates[7].

Enthorf and Spengler(2002)[8] find that planning-intense offences like breaking and entering, robbery (ram raids) and violence respond relatively slow to changes in the socio-economic conditions compared to other types of crime like drug and alcohol abuse and violent crime. According to the authors, this may reflect that in a first response to unfortunate social and economic developments some of the affected might become attracted to alcohol and drug abuse, which in a later phase has to be financed with criminal activities by committing property crimes like breaking and entering.

Impacts

Mobility impact

A location or building has a higher risk for ram raid when it is easily accessible by large trucks. In order to prevent ram raids, locations which are more likely to suffer from ram raids (banks etc.) could be protected against ram raid by making it less accessible to large trucks. However, that would have an impact of the mobility and accessibility in general of that area. For example, one could lower the accessibility of a street for large trucks by putting a barrier on a certain height which allows person cars but not larger trucks or buses, or by making the street narrower. That would also have an impact on the accessibility of e.g. normal public transport (buses) or delivery of goods to shops with trucks. This can be an undesirable side effect of such measures on mobility.

Economic impact

Ram raids lead to considerable costs in both a direct (primary) and a indirect (secondary) way[9]. Direct costs of ram raids come in the form of:

  • Preventive costs in anticipation of ram raids (e.g. security measures, insurance);
  • Material and immaterial costs as a consequence of ram raids (e.g. physical damage, repairments, medical costs, mental harm); and
  • Responsive costs to ram raids (e.g. the costs of detection and prevention, persecution, support trial, etc.).

In addition, the secondary economic impact of criminal offences has to be considered. Violent crime not only leads to financial or physical damage and prevention costs, but also indirectly influences the local/regional and national economy of a country. According to Detotto and Otranto [10],“crime acts like a tax on the entire economy: it discourages domestic and foreign direct investments[11]. On a more local and regional level, economists define economic impact on business, property value, tourism and quality of life (social capital).

Measures

  • based on reducing occurence[12]
  • based on reducing damage[13]
A bollard (and two big flower boxes which can also function as vehicle stoppers) in front of a shop to deter ram raiders.

Commercial properties in areas prone to ram-raids often erect strong barriers or obstructions, such as bollards, to discourage such attacks. ATM centres are also victims of ram-raiding.

Many companies have come up with solutions to ram-raiding.[14] Everything from electronic bollards to electronic barriers have been employed to keep property from the raiders. Another solution is security guards, but teams of "round the clock" security are expensive and often not the most economical way of dealing with ram-raiding.

Footnotes and references

  1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5uvkfoghUo
  2. for example in July 2012 (UK example): http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-19026835
  3. Rhodes, W. M., & Conly, C. (1981). Crime and mobility: An empirical study. In P. J. Brantingham, & P. L. Brantingham (Eds.), Environmental Criminology (pp. 167–188). Beverly Hills7 Sage.
  4. Bernasco Wim and Nieuwbeerta Paul, How do residential burglars select target areas? A new approach to the analysis of Criminal Location Choice, Brit. J. Criminol. (2005) 44, 296-315
  5. Kepple NJ, Freisthler B., Exploring the ecological association between crime and medical marijuana dispensaries.,J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Jul;73(4):523-30
  6. Farrington David P., Langan Patrick A., and Tonry Michael, Cross-National Studies in Crime and Justice, September 2004, NCJ 200988, pag. 26
  7. See, e.g.: Chapman, B., D Weatherburn, C.A. Kapuscinski, M. Chilvers and S. Roussel (2002). Unemployment duration, schooling and property crime. CEPR Working paper
  8. Entorf, H., H. Spengler (2002). Crime in Europe; Causes and Con-sequences. Springer-Verlag Berlin
  9. Primary economic impact (or direct effects) are generally defined as the initial, immediate economic output generated by a specific cause (in this case a criminal offence). Secondary economic impact (or indirect effects) are generated each time a subsequent transaction is made, for example, the impact of crime on the real estate value in the neighbourhood.
  10. Detotto,C. and E. Otranto (2010). Does crime affect Economic growth? KYKLOS, Vol.63–August 2010-No.3, 330-345.
  11. Foreign direct investment (FDI) is a direct investment by a business or enterprise in a foreign economy.
  12. add specific measures
  13. add specific measures
  14. 'Raminator' foils ATM ram raids. The Daily Telegraph. 21 Aug. 2008.