Difference between revisions of "Security issue: Raid"

From Securipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 23: Line 23:
 
* selling non-food
 
* selling non-food
 
* being situated close to a main road
 
* being situated close to a main road
* being relatively large<ref name="altizio"/>,<ref>Mirrlees-Black Curiona and Ross Alec, ''Crime against retail and manufacturing premises: findings from the 1994 Commercial Victimisation Survey'', Home Office Research Study 146, copyright 1995, ISBN 1 85893 554 7</ref>
+
* being relatively large<ref name="altizio"/>,<ref name="mirrlees">Mirrlees-Black Curiona and Ross Alec, ''Crime against retail and manufacturing premises: findings from the 1994 Commercial Victimisation Survey'', Home Office Research Study 146, copyright 1995, ISBN 1 85893 554 7</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
| High levels of raiding in the wider neighbourhood || Increases likelihood of targeting. || The distance to known places where offenders live matters. On average, burglars travel 2,6 km to commit their crimes<ref>Rhodes, W. M., & Conly, C. (1981). ''Crime and mobility: An empirical study.'' In P. J. Brantingham, & P. L. Brantingham (Eds.), Environmental Criminology (pp. 167–188). Beverly Hills7 Sage.</ref> and the odds of a neighbourhood’s being chosen increases by a factor of 1.67 for every kilometre closer to the burglar’s home it is located<ref>Bernasco Wim and Nieuwbeerta Paul, ''How do residential burglars select target areas? A new approach to the analysis of Criminal Location Choice'', Brit. J. Criminol. (2005) 44, 296-315</ref>.
+
| High levels of raiding in the wider neighbourhood || Increases likelihood of targeting. || The distance to known places where offenders live matters. Study shows that raiders prefer areas in or near their neigbourhoods<ref name="mirrlees"/>.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| High levels of unemployment || Increases likelihood of targeting || Although there is no real scientific consensus with respect to the causal relationship between the [[The economics of crime#Socio-economic causes of crime|socio-economic background]] and property crime, high levels of unemployment are often associated with higher levels of property crime<ref>Kepple NJ, Freisthler B., ''Exploring the ecological association between crime and medical marijuana dispensaries.'',J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Jul;73(4):523-30</ref><ref>See, ''e.g.'': Chapman, B., D Weatherburn, C.A. Kapuscinski, M. Chilvers and S. Roussel (2002). ''Unemployment duration, schooling and property crime''. CEPR Working paper</ref>.
 
| High levels of unemployment || Increases likelihood of targeting || Although there is no real scientific consensus with respect to the causal relationship between the [[The economics of crime#Socio-economic causes of crime|socio-economic background]] and property crime, high levels of unemployment are often associated with higher levels of property crime<ref>Kepple NJ, Freisthler B., ''Exploring the ecological association between crime and medical marijuana dispensaries.'',J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Jul;73(4):523-30</ref><ref>See, ''e.g.'': Chapman, B., D Weatherburn, C.A. Kapuscinski, M. Chilvers and S. Roussel (2002). ''Unemployment duration, schooling and property crime''. CEPR Working paper</ref>.

Revision as of 12:21, 15 February 2013

Security camera footage of a raid

Raid is the crime of taking or attempting to take something of value from a commercial venue by force or threat of force or by putting the victim in fear. For the crime of forceful theft from individuals, see robbery, for the crime of burglary by forcing entrance by use of ramming with vehicles, see Ram raid.

Description

Although the number of robberies from commercial establishments is only about 21% of all robberies[1], the impact of those robberies is high, affecting primarily personnel, but also clients and bystanders and they can excess to very violent forms[2]. The act of raiding knows several forms:

  • Straight: Demanding money immediately upon entering a store.
  • Customer: Demanding money some time after entering a store and engaging in the act of making a purchase.
  • Merchandise robbery: A less common type is which involves the forcible taking of goods from a store.[3]

Contributing circumstances

Known circumstances to influence the likelihood or impact of raid, are presented in the table below:

Contributing Circumstance Influence Description
Presence of shops increases number of potential targets As shops are prime targets for raids, and any shop can potentially become a victim of raid, the presence of shops is an important circumstance that contributes to the existence of this security issue.
Presence of particularly vulnerable shops increases vulnerability of targets The vulnerability of a shop - and the attraction this has for raiders - is associated with the shop
  • being open late
  • having no surveillance from the shop to the street or vice versa
  • being situated on the street (not in a mall)
  • selling non-food
  • being situated close to a main road
  • being relatively large[3],[4]
High levels of raiding in the wider neighbourhood Increases likelihood of targeting. The distance to known places where offenders live matters. Study shows that raiders prefer areas in or near their neigbourhoods[4].
High levels of unemployment Increases likelihood of targeting Although there is no real scientific consensus with respect to the causal relationship between the socio-economic background and property crime, high levels of unemployment are often associated with higher levels of property crime[5][6].

Impacts

Social impact

  • psychological

Economic impact

Raids lead to considerable costs in both a direct (primary) and a indirect (secondary) way[7]. Direct costs of raids come in the form of:

  • Preventive costs in anticipation of raids (e.g. security measures, insurance);
  • Material and immaterial costs as a consequence of raids (e.g. physical damage, repairs, medical costs, mental harm); and
  • Responsive costs to raids (e.g. the costs of detection and prevention, persecution, support trial, etc.).

In addition, the secondary economic impact of criminal offences has to be considered. Violent crime not only leads to financial or physical damage and prevention costs, but also indirectly influences the local/regional and national economy of a country. According to Detotto and Otranto [8],“crime acts like a tax on the entire economy: it discourages domestic and foreign direct investments[9]. On a more local and regional level, economists define economic impact on business, property value, tourism and quality of life (social capital).

Mobility impact

Safety impact

Measures

  • Surveillance
  • Reaction force
  • Target hardening
  • Access control
  • Reducing attractiveness (no money in register)
  • Increasing chance of apprehension

Enthorf and Spengler(2002)[10] find that planning-intense offences like breaking and entering, robbery (raids) and violence respond relatively slow to changes in the socio-economic conditions compared to other types of crime like drug and alcohol abuse and violent crime. According to the authors, this may reflect that in a first response to unfortunate social and economic developments some of the affected might become attracted to alcohol and drug abuse, which in a later phase has to be financed with criminal activities by committing property crimes like breaking and entering.

Footnotes and references

  1. CJIS, Crime in the United States 2011, http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011
  2. As is illustrated by a series of extremely violent raids by a Belgium gang in the 1980s, killing a total of 28 people. see: wikipedia:Brabant killers
  3. 3.0 3.1 Altizio Alicia and York Diana, Robbery of Convenience Stores, Problem-Oriented Guides for Police, Guide No. 49, April 2007
  4. 4.0 4.1 Mirrlees-Black Curiona and Ross Alec, Crime against retail and manufacturing premises: findings from the 1994 Commercial Victimisation Survey, Home Office Research Study 146, copyright 1995, ISBN 1 85893 554 7
  5. Kepple NJ, Freisthler B., Exploring the ecological association between crime and medical marijuana dispensaries.,J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Jul;73(4):523-30
  6. See, e.g.: Chapman, B., D Weatherburn, C.A. Kapuscinski, M. Chilvers and S. Roussel (2002). Unemployment duration, schooling and property crime. CEPR Working paper
  7. Primary economic impact (or direct effects) are generally defined as the initial, immediate economic output generated by a specific cause (in this case a criminal offence). Secondary economic impact (or indirect effects) are generated each time a subsequent transaction is made, for example, the impact of crime on the real estate value in the neighbourhood.
  8. Detotto,C. and E. Otranto (2010). Does crime affect Economic growth? KYKLOS, Vol.63–August 2010-No.3, 330-345.
  9. Foreign direct investment (FDI) is a direct investment by a business or enterprise in a foreign economy.
  10. Entorf, H., H. Spengler (2002). Crime in Europe; Causes and Con-sequences. Springer-Verlag Berlin