Difference between revisions of "All-hazard approach"

From Securipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Category:Safety]]
  
[[Category:Safety]]
 
[[Category:Threat]]
  
[[Category:Threat]]
−
The '''all-hazard approach''' is a generalized framework for [[Crisis management cycle|mitigating, preparing for and responding to]] a wide range of disasters, emergencies and security [[threat|threats]], irrespective of the nature of the event. All-hazards incorporates
+
The '''all-hazard approach''' is a generalized framework for [[Crisis management cycle|mitigating, preparing for and responding to]] a wide range of disasters, emergencies and security [[threat|threats]], irrespective of the nature of the event. "All-hazards" can be seen as part of a [[comprehensive appraoch]]. It comprises:
 
* [[Natural threat|natural]] (e.g. flooding, earthquakes etc.),
 
* [[Natural threat|natural]] (e.g. flooding, earthquakes etc.),
 
* man-made (e.g. industrial accidents, [[technical failure]], [[human failure]]) and
 
* man-made (e.g. industrial accidents, [[technical failure]], [[human failure]]) and
Line 7: Line 7:
 
hazards and threats. A complete all-hazard plan requires input from an all-hazard team (experts and all [[stakeholders]]) and includes exhaustive information for all risks and events.
  
hazards and threats. A complete all-hazard plan requires input from an all-hazard team (experts and all [[stakeholders]]) and includes exhaustive information for all risks and events.
   
−
The all-hazard approach has emerged in the field of disaster and emergency management and then spread to [[critical infrastructure|critical infrastructure protection]]. It has gained ground on the international scale (e.g. [http://training.fema.gov/AllHazards/ FEMA], [http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/preparedness.shtm DHS], [http://www.ahcusa.org/ AHC], [http://www.icsm.gov.au/all-hazards/index.html ICSM], see also GAO 2005<ref>GAO (2005): HOMELAND SECURITY. DHS’ Efforts to Enhance First Responders’ All-Hazards Capabilities. Continue to Evolve. Report to the Chairman and Ranking Democratic Member, Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives. GAO-05-652 United States Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05652.pdf [2012-07-11].</ref>, Commonwealth Australia 2009<ref>Commonwealth of Australia (2009): Australian Emergency Management Arrangements. Published by The Attorney-General’s Department. ISBN 978-1-921152-15-3.Retrieved from: http://www.em.gov.au/Documents/Australian%20Emergency%20Management%20Arrangements.pdf [2012-07-11].</ref>, Bullock et al. 2009<ref>Bullock Jane, Haddow George, Coppola Damon P., Yeletaysi Sarp (2009): Introduction to Homeland Security: Principles of All-Hazards Response. 3rd Ed. Burlington: Elsevier. ISBN: 978-1856175098</ref>) and, together with the [[comprehensive approach]] in [[security]] policies and European and national security research, has been advanced in order to meet current and future threats. The basis to meet this goal is better integration of information, assessment, policies, capacities and capabilities.
 +
The all-hazard approach has emerged in the field of disaster and emergency management and then spread to [[critical infrastructure|critical infrastructure protection]]. It has gained ground on the international scale (e.g. [http://training.fema.gov/AllHazards/FEMA], [http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/preparedness.shtm DHS], [http://www.ahcusa.org/ AHC], [http://www.icsm.gov.au/all-hazards/index.html ICSM], see also GAO 2005<ref>GAO (2005): HOMELAND SECURITY. DHS’ Efforts to Enhance First Responders’ All-Hazards Capabilities. Continue to Evolve. Report to the Chairman and Ranking Democratic Member, Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives. GAO-05-652 United States Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05652.pdf [2012-07-11].</ref>, Commonwealth Australia 2009<ref>Commonwealth of Australia (2009): Australian Emergency Management Arrangements. Published by The Attorney-General’s Department. ISBN 978-1-921152-15-3.Retrieved from: http://www.em.gov.au/Documents/Australian%20Emergency%20Management%20Arrangements.pdf [2012-07-11].</ref>, Bullock et al. 2009<ref>Bullock Jane, Haddow George, Coppola Damon P., Yeletaysi Sarp (2009): Introduction to Homeland Security: Principles of All-Hazards Response. 3rd Ed. Burlington: Elsevier. ISBN: 978-1856175098</ref>) and, together with the [[comprehensive approach]] in [[security]] policies and European and national security research, has been advanced in order to meet current and future threats. The basis to meet this goal is better integration of information, assessment, policies, capacities and capabilities.
   
−
==EU-all-hazard approach==
 +
==All-hazard approach in the EU==
−
The EU follows an all-hazard approach in the [http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/justice_freedom_security/fight_against_terrorism/l33260_en.htm European Program for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP)], and is aiming for using knowledge management principles and collecting a repertory of political, technological and other solutions. However, the all-hazard approach is not systemically applied yet; and systemic, strategic and proactive management is not always implemented in practice. Due to lack of common risk assessment standards, threats are often underestimated.
 +
The EU follows an all-hazard approach in the [http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/justice_freedom_security/fight_against_terrorism/l33260_en.htm European Program for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP)], and is aiming to using knowledge management principles and collecting a repertory of political, technological and other solutions. However, due to lack of common risk assessment standards, threats often remain underestimated.
   
−
In its communication on the EU Internal Security Strategy, the European Commission<ref>European Commission (2010): COM(2010) 673 final. Communication from the Commission to the Euro¬pean Parliament and the Council. The EU Internal Security Strategy in Action: Five steps towards a more secure Europe: 8-11 Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/malmstrom/archive/internal_security_strategy_in_action_en.pdf [2011-08-09].</ref> appeals for uniform risk analyses based on standardized criteria to establish a Common Risk Management Framework (CRMF), also including risk information and risk-based controls. Based on the Security Strategy<ref>Ibid.</ref> and the Communications on the Prevention of Natural and Man-made Disasters<ref>Commission of the European Communities (2009): COM(2009)82 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Community approach on the prevention of natural and man-made disasters. {SEC(2009)202} {SEC(2009)203}. Retrieved from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0082:FIN:EN:PDF [ 2011-08-09].</ref>, the EC developed Risk Assessment und Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management<ref>European Commission (2010): SEC(2010) 1626 final. Commission Staff Working Paper. Risk Assessment and Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/echo/civil_protection/civil/pdfdocs/prevention/COMM_PDF_SEC_2010_1626_F_staff_working_document_en.pdf [2011-08-09].</ref>. These guidelines are aimed to support the member states in their efforts and contributions for a European Risk Atlas and to serve as a further basis for an adequate coherent all-hazard risk policy due to be established by 2014.
 +
In its communication on the EU Internal Security Strategy, the European Commission<ref>European Commission (2010): COM(2010) 673 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. The EU Internal Security Strategy in Action: Five steps towards a more secure Europe: 8-11 Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/malmstrom/archive/internal_security_strategy_in_action_en.pdf [2011-08-09].</ref> calls for uniform risk analyses based on standardized criteria to establish a Common Risk Management Framework (CRMF), also including risk information and risk-based controls. Based on the Security Strategy<ref>Ibid.</ref> and the Communications on the Prevention of Natural and Man-made Disasters<ref>Commission of the European Communities (2009): COM(2009)82 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Community approach on the prevention of natural and man-made disasters. {SEC(2009)202} {SEC(2009)203}. Retrieved from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0082:FIN:EN:PDF [ 2011-08-09].</ref>, the EC developed Risk Assessment und Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management<ref>European Commission (2010): SEC(2010) 1626 final. Commission Staff Working Paper. Risk Assessment and Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/echo/civil_protection/civil/pdfdocs/prevention/COMM_PDF_SEC_2010_1626_F_staff_working_document_en.pdf [2011-08-09].</ref>. These guidelines are aimed to support Member States in their efforts and contributions to a European Risk Atlas and to serve as a further basis for an coherent all-hazard risk policy intended to be established by 2014.
  +
  +
==Relevance for urban planning==
  +
Following the EU's Risk Assessment and Mapping Guidelines, the EU's all-hazard approach to critical infrastructure protection could drive legislative change that is relevant for urban planning. The process towards a European Risk Atlas could also help urban planners identify new or so far not sufficiently assessed criticalities in their planning decisions and in urban infrastructure. This could then help forseeing timely and appropriate measures to increase resilience of infrastructure, such as for example by methods of [[environmental design]].
   
 
{{references}}
  
{{references}}

Revision as of 14:29, 4 February 2013

The all-hazard approach is a generalized framework for mitigating, preparing for and responding to a wide range of disasters, emergencies and security threats, irrespective of the nature of the event. "All-hazards" can be seen as part of a comprehensive appraoch. It comprises:

hazards and threats. A complete all-hazard plan requires input from an all-hazard team (experts and all stakeholders) and includes exhaustive information for all risks and events.

The all-hazard approach has emerged in the field of disaster and emergency management and then spread to critical infrastructure protection. It has gained ground on the international scale (e.g. [1], DHS, AHC, ICSM, see also GAO 2005[1], Commonwealth Australia 2009[2], Bullock et al. 2009[3]) and, together with the comprehensive approach in security policies and European and national security research, has been advanced in order to meet current and future threats. The basis to meet this goal is better integration of information, assessment, policies, capacities and capabilities.

All-hazard approach in the EU

The EU follows an all-hazard approach in the European Program for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP), and is aiming to using knowledge management principles and collecting a repertory of political, technological and other solutions. However, due to lack of common risk assessment standards, threats often remain underestimated.

In its communication on the EU Internal Security Strategy, the European Commission[4] calls for uniform risk analyses based on standardized criteria to establish a Common Risk Management Framework (CRMF), also including risk information and risk-based controls. Based on the Security Strategy[5] and the Communications on the Prevention of Natural and Man-made Disasters[6], the EC developed Risk Assessment und Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management[7]. These guidelines are aimed to support Member States in their efforts and contributions to a European Risk Atlas and to serve as a further basis for an coherent all-hazard risk policy intended to be established by 2014.

Relevance for urban planning

Following the EU's Risk Assessment and Mapping Guidelines, the EU's all-hazard approach to critical infrastructure protection could drive legislative change that is relevant for urban planning. The process towards a European Risk Atlas could also help urban planners identify new or so far not sufficiently assessed criticalities in their planning decisions and in urban infrastructure. This could then help forseeing timely and appropriate measures to increase resilience of infrastructure, such as for example by methods of environmental design.

Footnotes and references

  1. ↑ GAO (2005): HOMELAND SECURITY. DHS’ Efforts to Enhance First Responders’ All-Hazards Capabilities. Continue to Evolve. Report to the Chairman and Ranking Democratic Member, Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives. GAO-05-652 United States Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05652.pdf [2012-07-11].
  2. ↑ Commonwealth of Australia (2009): Australian Emergency Management Arrangements. Published by The Attorney-General’s Department. ISBN 978-1-921152-15-3.Retrieved from: http://www.em.gov.au/Documents/Australian%20Emergency%20Management%20Arrangements.pdf [2012-07-11].
  3. ↑ Bullock Jane, Haddow George, Coppola Damon P., Yeletaysi Sarp (2009): Introduction to Homeland Security: Principles of All-Hazards Response. 3rd Ed. Burlington: Elsevier. ISBN: 978-1856175098
  4. ↑ European Commission (2010): COM(2010) 673 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. The EU Internal Security Strategy in Action: Five steps towards a more secure Europe: 8-11 Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/malmstrom/archive/internal_security_strategy_in_action_en.pdf [2011-08-09].
  5. ↑ Ibid.
  6. ↑ Commission of the European Communities (2009): COM(2009)82 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Community approach on the prevention of natural and man-made disasters. {SEC(2009)202} {SEC(2009)203}. Retrieved from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0082:FIN:EN:PDF [ 2011-08-09].
  7. ↑ European Commission (2010): SEC(2010) 1626 final. Commission Staff Working Paper. Risk Assessment and Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/echo/civil_protection/civil/pdfdocs/prevention/COMM_PDF_SEC_2010_1626_F_staff_working_document_en.pdf [2011-08-09].
Retrieved from "https://securipedia.eu/index.php?title=All-hazard_approach&oldid=9906"