Difference between revisions of "Security issue: Robbery"
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
Robberies lead to socio-economic [[Economic effects of crime|costs]] that reach beyond the financial value of the property stolen. The [[Primary economic impact|direct]] economic impact of robberies are for about 65% the result of the physical and emotional impact on direct victims, health costs, value of property stolen, and lost productivity (the costs as a consequence of crime).<ref>Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate (2005). The economic and social costs of crime against individuals and households 2003/04.</ref>. The rest is the result of costs in response to crime by public authorities (criminal justice system)<ref>Ibid</ref>. Robberies occur less frequent than for example burglaries or acts of vandalism, but the average cost per event (± £7,282) is twice the amount compared to an average burglary.<ref>Ibid</ref>. This is mostly the result of higher physical and emotional damage, loss of output and costs for the criminal justice system. |
Robberies lead to socio-economic [[Economic effects of crime|costs]] that reach beyond the financial value of the property stolen. The [[Primary economic impact|direct]] economic impact of robberies are for about 65% the result of the physical and emotional impact on direct victims, health costs, value of property stolen, and lost productivity (the costs as a consequence of crime).<ref>Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate (2005). The economic and social costs of crime against individuals and households 2003/04.</ref>. The rest is the result of costs in response to crime by public authorities (criminal justice system)<ref>Ibid</ref>. Robberies occur less frequent than for example burglaries or acts of vandalism, but the average cost per event (± £7,282) is twice the amount compared to an average burglary.<ref>Ibid</ref>. This is mostly the result of higher physical and emotional damage, loss of output and costs for the criminal justice system. |
||
− | Robberies can also have a lasting [[Secondary economic impact|indirect]] impact on society, the [[Economic effects of crime#Secondary economic impact of crime|secondary economic impact of crime]]. On a more local and regional level, frequent robberies can have a negative impact on local business, social life, tourism and housing prices. Empirical research by the Federal Reserve Bank of Ney York, for example, quantified the relationship between a reduction in crime such as robberies and homicides and the change in the prices of nearby residential real estate, concluding that intensive policing had a substantial effect on the property values and the inequality among residential prices<ref>Frischtak, C. and B.R. Mandel (2012). Crime, House Prices, and Inequality: The Effect of UPPs in Rio. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Staff Report no.542. http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr542.pdf</ref>. |
+ | Robberies can also have a lasting [[Secondary economic impact|indirect]] impact on society, the [[Economic effects of crime#Secondary economic impact of crime|secondary economic impact of crime]]. On a more local and regional level, frequent robberies can have a negative impact on local business, social life, tourism and housing prices. Empirical research by the Federal Reserve Bank of Ney York, for example, quantified the relationship between a reduction in crime such as robberies and homicides and the change in the prices of nearby residential real estate, concluding that intensive policing had a substantial positive effect on the property values and the inequality among residential prices<ref>Frischtak, C. and B.R. Mandel (2012). Crime, House Prices, and Inequality: The Effect of UPPs in Rio. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Staff Report no.542. http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr542.pdf</ref>. |
Robbers, especially street robbers "are notoriously difficult to deter"<ref>M. Scott (2001). Robbery at Automated Teller Machines. Guide No.8. Center for Problem-Oriented Policing.</ref>."They require relatively small amounts of cash to justify their risk, they have a lot of crime opportunities, they want cash immediately, and street robbery does not require much skill or planning"<ref> Wright and Decker (1997)in: Ibid.</ref>. On top of that, robbers will adapt quickly to preventive security measures in accordance with the [[The economics of crime|economics of criminal behaviour]]. Taxi robbers, for example, sometimes use a female accomplice to order a taxi. |
Robbers, especially street robbers "are notoriously difficult to deter"<ref>M. Scott (2001). Robbery at Automated Teller Machines. Guide No.8. Center for Problem-Oriented Policing.</ref>."They require relatively small amounts of cash to justify their risk, they have a lot of crime opportunities, they want cash immediately, and street robbery does not require much skill or planning"<ref> Wright and Decker (1997)in: Ibid.</ref>. On top of that, robbers will adapt quickly to preventive security measures in accordance with the [[The economics of crime|economics of criminal behaviour]]. Taxi robbers, for example, sometimes use a female accomplice to order a taxi. |
Revision as of 16:07, 21 February 2013
Robbery is the crime of taking or attempting to take something of value by force or threat of force or by putting the victim in fear. It is used her exclusively for acts committed to individual persons. For the forceful theft from commercial venues, see raid.
Contents
Description
In the context of urban planning, robbery is most relevant if performed in the public space. This form of robbery, called street robbery has the following five characteristics[1]:
- the offender targets a victim;
- the victim is a stranger to the offender;
- the offender attempts or completes a theft of cash or property;
- the offender uses force or the threat of force against the victim; and
- the offence occurs in a public or semi-public place, such as on a street, in an alley, in a parking garage, in a public park, on or near public transportation, or in a shared apartment hallway.
Mark that a robbery need not involve the use of a weapon or injuries of the victim.
Several subtypes of street robbery exist that vary in frequency depending on local circumstances. Among the better known are:
- purse-snatching (referred to as "snatch theft")
- robbery at automated teller machines;
- robbery of drunken bar patrons; robbery of students (e.g., middle- and high-school students and college students);
- robbery of passengers near public transportation systems; and
- robbery of migrant labourers.
Contributing circumstances
Known circumstances to influence the likelihood or effect of robbery are presented in the table below:
Contributing Circumstance | Influence | Description |
---|---|---|
Attractive locations for robbery | Increases success rate of robbery | Some locations are by nature particularly suited for robbery, by the fact that they are relatively deserted, lack surveillance, have potential victims and offer many easy exits to flee the crime scene. Examples of such locations include parking lots and garages, parks, fields, playgrounds, and areas near public transportation[2], and ATMs[3]. |
Lack of surveillance. | Decreases risk of detection. | A low level of surveillance, particularly round-the-clock surveillance, decreases the perceived risk of detection for a perpetrator and thereby increases the attractiveness. |
Long reaction times or inadequate action of reaction force. | Decreases likelihood of apprehension | Untimely or inappropriate reactions to violence lead to a perception of little control, which will increase perceived risk for the public and decrease perceived risk for the perpetrators. |
High levels of robbery in the vicinity. | Increases likelihood of targeting. | The distance to known places where offenders live matters. On average, robbers travel 2,1 km to commit their crimes[4], and the chance of a neighbourhood to be chosen reduces with every km distance from the offender's home. |
High levels of unemployment | Increases likelihood of targetting | High levels of unemployment are correlated with higher levels of property crime [5]. |
High expected levels of drug- or alcohol abuse | Reduces inhibitions for crime | The presence of regular abusers of alcohol or drugs has a strong correlation with the occurrence of robbery, often thought to be caused by the need for financing an addiction. Studies show that about 35% of all robbery is committed under the influence of alcohol[6]. |
Presence of excitement or distractions | Increases vulnerability of victims | A legitimate distraction enables the robber to gain contact with the victim without causing alarm. Street robbers could perceive people who are distracted (e.g., using a cell phone, drunk, and/or unfamiliar with their surroundings) as easier to approach and overpower. Distracting circumstances such as road works, which require a detour in unfamiliar surroundings, special events or holidays can also provide the distractions that aid robbers.[2] |
Impacts
Social impact
- Psychological distress, including fear, anger and depression[7]
- social effects
- Physical harm
- (Personal) financial loss
- Decrease in perceived security
- Increased personal vulnerability
Economic impact
Robberies lead to socio-economic costs that reach beyond the financial value of the property stolen. The direct economic impact of robberies are for about 65% the result of the physical and emotional impact on direct victims, health costs, value of property stolen, and lost productivity (the costs as a consequence of crime).[8]. The rest is the result of costs in response to crime by public authorities (criminal justice system)[9]. Robberies occur less frequent than for example burglaries or acts of vandalism, but the average cost per event (± £7,282) is twice the amount compared to an average burglary.[10]. This is mostly the result of higher physical and emotional damage, loss of output and costs for the criminal justice system.
Robberies can also have a lasting indirect impact on society, the secondary economic impact of crime. On a more local and regional level, frequent robberies can have a negative impact on local business, social life, tourism and housing prices. Empirical research by the Federal Reserve Bank of Ney York, for example, quantified the relationship between a reduction in crime such as robberies and homicides and the change in the prices of nearby residential real estate, concluding that intensive policing had a substantial positive effect on the property values and the inequality among residential prices[11].
Robbers, especially street robbers "are notoriously difficult to deter"[12]."They require relatively small amounts of cash to justify their risk, they have a lot of crime opportunities, they want cash immediately, and street robbery does not require much skill or planning"[13]. On top of that, robbers will adapt quickly to preventive security measures in accordance with the economics of criminal behaviour. Taxi robbers, for example, sometimes use a female accomplice to order a taxi.
Mobility impact
Safety impact
Measures
Many strategies exist to reduce the risk of street robbery. Of these, most are actions that are taken just before or after specific incidents. These are therefore not suited to be integrated in to the planning of urban environment, as this generally precedes incidents by a long time. Measures[1] that are effective against street robbery and can be taken (or at least influenced) by the urban planner, are:
- Providing safe transportation
- Providing safe routes during construction
- Reducing intoxication in high-risk areas
- Removing hiding spots
- Increasing lighting at high-risk sites
- Surveillance (electronic or other)
- Increasing pedestrian density near risky places
- Installing emergency call stations
Footnotes and references
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 http://www.popcenter.org/problems/street_robbery
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Monk Khadija M., Heinonen Justin A. and Eck John E., Street Robbery, Problem-Oriented Guides for Police, Guide No. 59, April 2010
- ↑ Scott Michael S., Robbery at Automated Teller Machines, Problem-Oriented Guides for Police Series, Guide No. 8
- ↑ Beauregarda Eric T, Proulxb Jean, D., Rossmoc Kim A., Spatial patterns of sex offenders: Theoretical, empirical, and practical issues, Aggression and Violent Behavior 10 (2005) 579–603
- ↑ Kepple NJ, Freisthler B., Exploring the ecological association between crime and medical marijuana dispensaries.,J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Jul;73(4):523-30
- ↑ Greenfeld, Lawrence A, Alcohol and crime, an analysis of national data on the prevalence of alcohol involvement in crime, U,.S. Department of Justice, Office of justice Programs, April 5-7 1998, Washington D.C.
- ↑ http://irv.sagepub.com/content/14/2/175
- ↑ Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate (2005). The economic and social costs of crime against individuals and households 2003/04.
- ↑ Ibid
- ↑ Ibid
- ↑ Frischtak, C. and B.R. Mandel (2012). Crime, House Prices, and Inequality: The Effect of UPPs in Rio. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Staff Report no.542. http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr542.pdf
- ↑ M. Scott (2001). Robbery at Automated Teller Machines. Guide No.8. Center for Problem-Oriented Policing.
- ↑ Wright and Decker (1997)in: Ibid.