Difference between revisions of "Economic"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Entry points == |
== Entry points == |
||
| + | * [[Economic functionality of urban objects]] |
||
| + | * [[Economic impact]] |
||
| + | **[[Economic impact of security threats]] |
||
| + | **[[Economic impact of security measures]] |
||
| + | **[[The economics of criminal and terrorist behaviour|Economics of criminal and terrorist behaviour]] |
||
| + | *[[Economic output]] |
||
| + | *[[Economic tools]] |
||
| + | |||
Urban objects such as residential buildings, industry, utility facilities, roads, etc. do not merely have a directly related function such as housing, commercial, mobility, safety, but also have an [[is synonymous to::Economic functionality of urban objects|economic function]]. A residential area, for example, will not just house people, but will also generate [[comprises::Economic impact|economic effects (economic impact)]] such as real estate value, jobs for local retaillers and cleaning services, and expenses for local governments in terms of necessary infrastructure, schools, public services, etc. |
Urban objects such as residential buildings, industry, utility facilities, roads, etc. do not merely have a directly related function such as housing, commercial, mobility, safety, but also have an [[is synonymous to::Economic functionality of urban objects|economic function]]. A residential area, for example, will not just house people, but will also generate [[comprises::Economic impact|economic effects (economic impact)]] such as real estate value, jobs for local retaillers and cleaning services, and expenses for local governments in terms of necessary infrastructure, schools, public services, etc. |
||
Revision as of 14:50, 4 December 2012
Contents
Economic
The economic dimension of urban planning is one of the core dimensions of urban planning and deals with the economic functioning of urban objects and the related impact of urban development and security threats (including security measures).
Description
Urban objects such as residential buildings, industry, utility facilities, roads, etc., do not merely have a directly related function such as housing, commercial, mobility, safety, but also have an 'economic function' in terms of the impact on the urban environment. A residential area, for example, will not just house people, but will also generate an economic impact in terms of real estate value, jobs for local retaillers, and expenses for local governments in terms of necessary infrastructure, schools, public services, etc. This relationship between urban objects and economic output (in terms of jobs and income), made an increasing amount of urban planners believe in the potential contribution of the planning system to maximize the net welfare of society with the help of appropriate policy measures that influence the delivery of a more attractive, competitive and successful urban area[1].
As a result of the economic function of urban objects, security threats such as crime & terrorism (but also natural hazards), not only have an impact on the direct function of an urban object[2], but also on the (more indirect) economic function of the specific urban object and its environment. In Securipedia we refer to this phenomenon as the economic impact of security threats. Subsequently, possible measures such as surveillance, CCTV, preventive, locks, etc., not only cost money, but will also generate less tangible economic effects due to the impact on the urban area. Fortified retail stores with cameras and shutters, for example, are not likely to contribute to a more attractive and successful urban area.
Entry points
Urban objects such as residential buildings, industry, utility facilities, roads, etc. do not merely have a directly related function such as housing, commercial, mobility, safety, but also have an economic function. A residential area, for example, will not just house people, but will also generate economic effects (economic impact) such as real estate value, jobs for local retaillers and cleaning services, and expenses for local governments in terms of necessary infrastructure, schools, public services, etc.
As a result of the economic function of urban objects, threats such as crime and terrorism (but also natural hazards), not only have an impact on the direct function of an urban object, but also on the (more indirect) economic function of the specific urban object and its environment. In Securipedia we refer to this phenomenon as the "economic impact of security threats". Subsequently, possible (security) measures such as surveillance, CCTV, preventive, locks, etc., will not only cost money, but will also generate secondary economic effects (for example the salaries of security guards, waiting lines at airports, etc.), together referred to as the economic impact of security measures.
To estimate the above mentioned economic impact of existing or newly developed urban objects/environments, threats and measures, economists use several economic tools that measure the economic output such as business output, wealth, total employment, etc. (the measurable part of economic effects).
Related subjects
Footnotes and references
- ↑ Source: DHP. End user requirement report (D1.1) VITRUV. Moreover, the increasing population in cities places more and more pressure on the development of land and has lead to the consolidation of the urban core. And, although this has led to a strengthening of the economic and social functions of the cities and surrounding areas, urban planners are at the same time forced to recognize the increasing threats caused by security threats that can have a devastating impact on the economic and social functioning of the urban area.
- ↑ A severely vandalised house, for example, is not suitable anymore for residential use.
MAP
<websiteFrame> website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Economic_dimension_of_urban_planning&depth=2 height=1023 width=100% border=0 scroll=auto align=middle </websiteFrame>
<headertabs/>
