Difference between revisions of "Security issue: Vehicle theft"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Attributing circumstances == |
== Attributing circumstances == |
||
* location (attainability of theft) |
* location (attainability of theft) |
||
| − | * Deserted car parking lots, quiet junctions and residential areas are often targets. In addition, vehicles stuck in traffic are often targets for a 'smash and grab' incident where an item of value is clearly visible (e.g. handbag, purse, stereo, etc)/ |
+ | * Deserted car parking lots, quiet junctions and residential areas are often targets. In addition, vehicles stuck in traffic are often targets for a 'smash and grab' incident where an item of value is clearly visible (e.g. handbag, purse, stereo, etc.)/ |
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|+ Risk of Car Theft by Parking Location in England and Wales (1982-1994)<ref>http://www.popcenter.org/problems/residential_car_theft/</ref> |
|+ Risk of Car Theft by Parking Location in England and Wales (1982-1994)<ref>http://www.popcenter.org/problems/residential_car_theft/</ref> |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
* [[valuables|attractiveness of vehicles or items in vehicles]] |
* [[valuables|attractiveness of vehicles or items in vehicles]] |
||
| − | * proximity to known area with |
+ | * proximity to known area with car theft |
== Impacts == |
== Impacts == |
||
===Economic impact=== |
===Economic impact=== |
||
| − | Property crimes such as vehicle theft lead to considerable costs in both a direct ([[Economic effects of crime#Primary economic impact of crime|primary]]) and a indirect ([[Economic effects of crime#Secondary economic impact of crime|secondary]]) way<ref>Primary economic impact (or direct effects) are generally defined as the initial, immediate economic output generated by a specific cause (in this case a criminal offence). Secondary economic impact (or indirect effects) are generated each time a subsequent transaction is made, for example, the impact of crime on the real estate value in the |
+ | Property crimes such as vehicle theft lead to considerable costs in both a direct ([[Economic effects of crime#Primary economic impact of crime|primary]]) and a indirect ([[Economic effects of crime#Secondary economic impact of crime|secondary]]) way<ref>Primary economic impact (or direct effects) are generally defined as the initial, immediate economic output generated by a specific cause (in this case a criminal offence). Secondary economic impact (or indirect effects) are generated each time a subsequent transaction is made, for example, the impact of crime on the real estate value in the neighbourhood.</ref>. Direct costs of vehicle theft come in the form of: |
* Preventive costs in anticipation of vehicle theft (e.g. security measures, prevention, insurance fees); |
* Preventive costs in anticipation of vehicle theft (e.g. security measures, prevention, insurance fees); |
||
| − | * Material and immaterial costs as a consequence of vehicle theft (e.g. physical damage, |
+ | * Material and immaterial costs as a consequence of vehicle theft (e.g. physical damage, repairs, mental harm); and |
* Responsive costs to vehicle theft (e.g. the costs of detection and prevention, persecution, support trial, etc.). |
* Responsive costs to vehicle theft (e.g. the costs of detection and prevention, persecution, support trial, etc.). |
||
| − | In addition, the [[Economic effects of crime#Secondary economic impact of crime|secondary economic impact]] of criminal offences has to be considered. Property crime like vehicle theft not only leads to financial or physical damage and prevention costs, but in case of frequent |
+ | In addition, the [[Economic effects of crime#Secondary economic impact of crime|secondary economic impact]] of criminal offences has to be considered. Property crime like vehicle theft not only leads to financial or physical damage and prevention costs, but in case of frequent occurrence also indirectly influences the local/regional and even national economy of a country. For example crime prone areas with a long-standing reputation for suffering from much crime, are subjects of high mobility of residents, vandalism, parking with extreme security measures, etc. In addition, one could consider the opportunity costs of police and other public services (like services for victim support). |
== Measures == |
== Measures == |
||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
= MAP = |
= MAP = |
||
| − | |||
<websiteFrame> |
<websiteFrame> |
||
website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?concept=Security issue: Vehicle theft |
website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?concept=Security issue: Vehicle theft |
||
| Line 56: | Line 55: | ||
align=middle |
align=middle |
||
</websiteFrame> |
</websiteFrame> |
||
| − | |||
<headertabs/> |
<headertabs/> |
||
Revision as of 18:30, 7 December 2012
Contents
Security issue: Vehicle theft
Vehicle theft is the crime of theft, or attempt of theft of or from a motor vehicle (automobile, truck, bus, motorcycle, etc.).
Description
This category includes both theft of and from vehicles in the same category, because the measures against it would be very alike from the viewpoint of an urban planner.
This category does not include: carjacking/joyriding, theft with access to keys, fraudulent theft, or opportunistic theft
Attributing circumstances
- location (attainability of theft)
- Deserted car parking lots, quiet junctions and residential areas are often targets. In addition, vehicles stuck in traffic are often targets for a 'smash and grab' incident where an item of value is clearly visible (e.g. handbag, purse, stereo, etc.)/
| Location | Thefts per 100,000 cars per 24 hours |
| Home garage | 2 |
| Home carport/drive | 40 |
| Home street | 117 |
- attractiveness of vehicles or items in vehicles
- proximity to known area with car theft
Impacts
Economic impact
Property crimes such as vehicle theft lead to considerable costs in both a direct (primary) and a indirect (secondary) way[2]. Direct costs of vehicle theft come in the form of:
- Preventive costs in anticipation of vehicle theft (e.g. security measures, prevention, insurance fees);
- Material and immaterial costs as a consequence of vehicle theft (e.g. physical damage, repairs, mental harm); and
- Responsive costs to vehicle theft (e.g. the costs of detection and prevention, persecution, support trial, etc.).
In addition, the secondary economic impact of criminal offences has to be considered. Property crime like vehicle theft not only leads to financial or physical damage and prevention costs, but in case of frequent occurrence also indirectly influences the local/regional and even national economy of a country. For example crime prone areas with a long-standing reputation for suffering from much crime, are subjects of high mobility of residents, vandalism, parking with extreme security measures, etc. In addition, one could consider the opportunity costs of police and other public services (like services for victim support).
Measures
- surveillance
- reaction force
- target hardening
- access control (parkings)
- deflecting offenders
- Education (don't leave valuables in car)
Footnotes and references
- ↑ http://www.popcenter.org/problems/residential_car_theft/
- ↑ Primary economic impact (or direct effects) are generally defined as the initial, immediate economic output generated by a specific cause (in this case a criminal offence). Secondary economic impact (or indirect effects) are generated each time a subsequent transaction is made, for example, the impact of crime on the real estate value in the neighbourhood.
MAP
<websiteFrame> website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?concept=Security issue: Vehicle theft width=100% border=0 scroll=auto align=middle </websiteFrame> <headertabs/>
