Difference between revisions of "Methods to integrate culture, ethics and legal aspects"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* [[Citizen jury]] |
* [[Citizen jury]] |
||
* [[Cooperative Discourse|Cooperative discourse]] |
* [[Cooperative Discourse|Cooperative discourse]] |
||
| ⚫ | |||
* [[Dynamic Facilitation]] |
* [[Dynamic Facilitation]] |
||
| ⚫ | |||
* [[Experimental participation method]] |
* [[Experimental participation method]] |
||
* [[Focus group]] |
* [[Focus group]] |
||
| Line 28: | Line 26: | ||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
{{references}} |
{{references}} |
||
Revision as of 19:01, 26 July 2012
Contents
Methods to integrate culture, ethics and legal aspects
Introduction
Urban planning should reflect urban resilience to be grounded in a holistic view of sustainability; and social, economic, political, demographic, and environmental functional components should be considered. To integrate these components citizen participation methods should be integral part respectively common standard of the planning process, already starting at concept level.
Citizen participation methods to be integrated in urban planning
- Activating opinion survey
- Advocacy planning
- Citizen jury
- Cooperative discourse
- Dynamic Facilitation
- Experimental participation method
- Focus group
- Future Workshop
- Local open dialogue
- Neosocratic Dialogue
- Participatory Diagnosis
- Planning for Real
- Safety audit
- State of the art technologies to integrate security information
Footnotes and references
MAP
<websiteFrame>
website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Insert your pagename here
height=1023
width=100%
border=0
scroll=auto
align=middle
</websiteFrame>
<headertabs/>
