Difference between revisions of "Methods to integrate culture, ethics and legal aspects"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [[Category:Ethical]] |
||
+ | [[Category:Legal]] |
||
+ | [[Category:Social]] |
||
+ | |||
=Methods to integrate culture, ethics and legal aspects= |
=Methods to integrate culture, ethics and legal aspects= |
||
Urban planning should reflect that urban resilience should be grounded in a holistic view of sustainability and consider social, economic, political, demographic, and environmental functional components. To integrate these components citizen participation methods should be integral part of the whole planning process. |
Urban planning should reflect that urban resilience should be grounded in a holistic view of sustainability and consider social, economic, political, demographic, and environmental functional components. To integrate these components citizen participation methods should be integral part of the whole planning process. |
Revision as of 18:49, 26 July 2012
Methods to integrate culture, ethics and legal aspects
Urban planning should reflect that urban resilience should be grounded in a holistic view of sustainability and consider social, economic, political, demographic, and environmental functional components. To integrate these components citizen participation methods should be integral part of the whole planning process.
- Activating opinion survey
- Advocacy planning
- Citizen Jury
- Cooperative discourse
- "Designing out" approach
- Dynamic Facilitation
- Environmental design
- Experimental participation method
- Focus group
- Future Workshop
- Local open dialogue
- Neosocratic Dialogue
- Participatory Diagnosis
- Planning for Real
- Safety audit
- State of the art technologies to integrate security information
Footnotes and references
MAP
<websiteFrame>
website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Insert your pagename here
height=1023
width=100%
border=0
scroll=auto
align=middle
</websiteFrame>
<headertabs/>