Sociospatial perspective

From Securipedia
Revision as of 10:24, 7 December 2012 by Albert (talk | contribs) (Text replace - " " to " ")
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Sociospatial perspective

The sociospatial perspective assumes that “social space operates as both a product and a producer of changes in the metropolitan environment[1].

In the sociospatial perspective, built environment is intrinsically meaningful, it has its particular “semiotics” that tell about policy, culture, society, economy, etc., and also about security.

Interaction of urban structures and society

On the bottom line, urban structure has an impact on social processes, and this needs to be addressed in strategic urban planning[2]. The school of “New Urbanism” has referred to this as the “sociospatial perspective”. This means that urban space and society interact.

Security related aspects

  • Design features of urban infrastructure influence citizens’ perception of the risk, that this infrastructure is at, as well as the general perception of criticality of that infrastructure.
  • Critics: Urbanization studies strongly argue that differences between actual and perceived security are not influenced by the design of built environment but that they mainly are mass media constructs. The perception of (in)security in cities rather depends "[...] upon the substantial amount and constant flow of information that urban residents receive from many sources[3].
  • Many examples of community-enhancing constructions represent an “elitism of architectural choice[4] that may in the end increase societal gaps and perceptions of fear, as well as actual insecurity.

Approaches how to address it

  • Consider interactions of society with urban space;
  • Consider social needs;
  • Involve citizens in planning projects (citizen participation);
  • Integrate society into urban planning and into urbanity;
  • Integrate approaches and findings from social sciences and humanities.

Related subjects

Footnotes and references

  1. M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 394; see also p. 20.
  2. Hannigan, J. (1998): Fantasy City: Pleasure and Profit in the Postmodern Metropolis. Routledge: London.
  3. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Enhancing urban safety and security. London: Earthscan, 2007, p. 19. Online: http://books.google.at/books?id=SmsbwAtSfE0C&pg=PA205&dq=legal+aspects+in+urban+planning+security&hl=de&ei=m-WzTu-tLMbQ4QST4vjQAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=legal%20aspects%20in%20urban%20planning%20security&f=false
  4. M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 331.

MAP

<websiteFrame> website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Sociospatial perspective height=1023 width=100% border=0 scroll=auto align=middle </websiteFrame>

<headertabs/>