Stakeholder-rated methods

From Securipedia
Revision as of 17:59, 22 March 2012 by Rosemarie (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=Stakeholder-related methods= '''Stakeholder-rated methods''' are required to make well-considered decisions regarding cultural, ethics and legal aspects of security issues in...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Stakeholder-related methods

Stakeholder-rated methods are required to make well-considered decisions regarding cultural, ethics and legal aspects of security issues in urban development processes.

t.b.e


List of requirements from VITRUV-related work

List of requirements from related projects and so far VITRUV work (in particular D1.1):

  • identify and involve all relevant actors in the process of urban planning, including active citizen participation;
  • consider the non-linearity based on the fact that in urban systems all phases of the common crisis management cycle may be experienced simultaneously in different parts of the city;
  • reflect that resilience in cities should be grounded in a holistic view of sustainability;
  • appreciate individual perceptions of security (e.g. on the level of regional or national patterns);
  • identify areas of concern and address them specifically, without extrapolating to the planning of the city as a whole;
  • combine urban planning with raising of citizens' awareness;
  • contribute to identifying individual as well as group-specific vulnerabilities and increasing resilience;
  • based on the acknowledgement that public urban space is about living and evolving, not about being watched and observed, a planning tool must always allow ample space for later changes and adaptations;
  • combine material aspects with social aspects of culture, processes built upon by the community safety approach that sees a general shift in political and public conceptions of security from situational prevention to safety of a community as a whole;
  • contribute to adequate foresight and scenario modeling, taking into account citizens´ acceptance and acceptability of alternative futures.

These requirements have only started to be addressed as part of relevant national and European projects, such as:

  • DynASS – Dynamic Arrangements of urban security culture

http://www.dynass-projekt.de/sicherheit-stadt/

  • Meet the Need – How physical and social phenomena can cause insecurity – and urban planning can do to tackle them

http://www.queraum.org/pdfs/Info_MtN.pdf

  • PluS – Planning urban Security

http://www.plus-eu.com/index.php?c=start&u=&l=en

  • DESURBS – DESigning of safer URBan Spaces

http://www.bezalel.ac.il/en/about/research/desurbs/

  • Chance2Sustain – Urban Chances - City Growth and the Sustainability Challenge

http://www.chance2sustain.eu/4.0.html