Security issue: Assault

From Securipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Security issue: Assault

Assault, in the use of this Securipedia, is a crime which involves causing a victim to fear or to experience any type of violence, except for sexual violence.

Description

Street fight

The specific meaning of assault varies between countries, but refers to an act that causes another to apprehend immediate and personal violence, or in the more limited sense, to apprehend a threat of violence caused by an immediate show of force. In legal terms, assault is a crime which involves causing a victim to fear violence, and is often distinguished from battery, which involves physical contact. For the use in this Securipedia, the broader definition of assault is used, meaning that battery will be included in the use of the term assault. Sexual assault is considered seperately.

Assault accounts for a relevant part of the total of recorded crime, e.g. for about 20% in the UK [1] as well as in the US [2].

Attributing circumstances

  • Use of alcohol and/or drugs: increases level of aggression. About one-third of the recorded assault cases are related to the use of alcohol or drugs[3]. The excessive use of alcohol and consequently the access to alcohol in bars, cafes, danceclubs and other places of entertainment, but also liquor dealers or discount stores selling alcohol in places where alcohol is consumed in the street are therefore important attributing circumstances for assault as security issue. Be aware that the type of establishment, as well as the way they are clustered can be of great influence on the extent that assault may result. A practical guide to assessing this can be found on the website of the Center for Problem-Orientated Policing [4].
  • Exitement: increases likelihood of conflict. Exitement can be induced for example by competitive sports or aggressive or arousing music.
  • Abandoned/secluded areas and low traffic volumes (cars and/or pedestrians): decreases likelihood of detection
  • Low level of social monitoring: decreases level of social correction
  • Low level of physical monitoring (e.g. cameras): decreases likelihood of detection, which reduces the possibilities of intervening and increases the likelihood of the conflict escalating
  • Long reaction times or inadequate action of reaction force
  • Presence of vulnerable groups: increases the likelihood of conflict

Socio-economic causes

Together with alcohol consumption, poverty is one of the few socio-economic causes that increases the risk of vulnerable groups such as women, children, adolescents and homosexuals[5] becoming victims of physical violence.

Impacts

Social impacts

From the social point of view, assaults can have various impacts, including generalised fear of crime and over-amplified feeling of insecurity, as well as loss of trust in institutions. There are several approaches to assess and address these impacts in urban planning that is responsive to citizens' security needs. It is particularly important to properly consider the gender perspective and the ecological perspective. The latter addresses the need to find a balance between desigining out crime by infrastructure and providing reason for more assaults by building infrastrucuture that can be perceived by some social groups as unjustly exclusionary.

There are checklists available from research that help address social aspects of security issues such as assault. A recommendable method to involve citizens in urban planning that "designs in" those social aspects is the safety audit.

See also

Economic impact

Assault leads to considerable costs in both a direct (primary) and a indirect (secondary) way[6]. Direct costs of assaults come in the form of:

  • Preventive costs in anticipation of assaults (e.g. private security measures);
  • Material and immaterial costs as a consequence of assaults (e.g. physical damage, repairments, medical costs, mental harm); and
  • Responsive costs to assaults (e.g. the costs of detection and prevention, persecution, support trial, etc.).

A Dutch study[7] estimated that the average costs of a physical assault in the Netherlands is EUR 5,500 per offence and a mere threat EUR 2,700.[8]. Moreover, there are costs related to behavioral changes due to a fear of victimization and harm done to the offender’s and victim’s family, friends and acquaintances. These costs are not quantified in the above mentioned studies.

Physical assault and battery don't just create costs for the victim and public authorities, but can also have a negative impact on the local economy (e.g. real estate value, business), the so called secondary economic impact of crime.

Mobility impacts

The mobility impacts depend on the size of the assault. In most cases, if it concerns only a few people, the mobility impact on the traffic flows or transportation system will be negligible.

In case the assault would lead to an obstruction of the road, traffic flows will be deteriorated, depending on the obstruction and the degree of robustness of the road network.

In case the assault would lead to an obstruction of an location of interest, people flows towards this location will be deteriorated. Depending on the type of location (e.g. a household or a commercial business) this obstruction will have an economic impact

When people are injured or in danger, emergency services will be called to assist. These include the police, ambulances or fire brigades. The emergency services need to know the best route to the incident location, taking into account possible obstructions. Incident management assists in reducing the duration an impact of incidents.

Safety impacts

Physical effects of assault include injuries, ranging from relatives innocent bruises to serious injuries like broken bones, cuts or shot wounds.

Measures

Potential measures that can mitigate the likelihood or impact of assault, are:

  • Avoid secluded areas
By designing the road network such that traffic flows are spread over the whole area, secluded areas can be prevented. Traffic simulation models (e.g. Urban Strategy, Dynasmart) can help with this by estimating traffic flows for alternative road designs.

Footnotes and references

  1. ↑ http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/science-research-statistics/research-statistics/crime-research/hosb1011/hosb1011?view=Binary, page 28
  2. ↑ http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus06.pdf, table 1
  3. ↑ http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus06.pdf, table 32
  4. ↑ http://www.popcenter.org/problems/assaultsinbars/
  5. ↑ See e.g.: Straus, M.A, and R.J. Gelles (2009); Zavaschi, M.Z. et al. (2002) http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?pid=S1020-49892002001100006&script=sci_arttext&tlng=es; Huebner, D.M. et al. (2003) http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.94.7.1200
  6. ↑ Primary economic impact (or direct effects) are generally defined as the initial, immediate economic output generated by a specific cause (in this case a criminal offence). Secondary economic impact (or indirect effects) are generated each time a subsequent transaction is made, for example, the impact of crime on the real estate value in the neighborhood.
  7. ↑ Source: SEO (2007).The costs of crime.
  8. ↑ This is relatively much compared to the average costs of e.g. vandalism (EUR 700 – EUR 950 per case) of property crimes (EUR 1,400 – 1,900 per case), but far less than sexual offences (EUR 48,000 per case) and murder (± EUR 3.2 million) Source: SEO, 2007

MAP

<websiteFrame> website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Security issue: Assault height=1023 width=100% border=0 scroll=auto align=middle </websiteFrame>

<headertabs/>

Retrieved from "https://securipedia.eu/index.php?title=Security_issue:_Assault&oldid=6932"