Difference between revisions of "Citizen participation"
m |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* Moreover, public and social [[perception of (in)security and risks]] is gaining increasing recognition in risk and security policies and decision making. Local community perception of risk situations and of security enhancing measures can be evaluated through citizen participation, and should be considered throughout the planning process. |
* Moreover, public and social [[perception of (in)security and risks]] is gaining increasing recognition in risk and security policies and decision making. Local community perception of risk situations and of security enhancing measures can be evaluated through citizen participation, and should be considered throughout the planning process. |
||
* Citizen participation methods are useful tools to address [[culture aspects]], [[legal aspects]] and [[ethics aspects]] in security related urban planning. |
* Citizen participation methods are useful tools to address [[culture aspects]], [[legal aspects]] and [[ethics aspects]] in security related urban planning. |
||
− | |||
− | |||
==Types of citizen participation for use in security related urban planning consultation processes<ref>United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT) (2007): Enhancing urban safety and security. London: Earthscan. Online: http://books.google.at/books?id=SmsbwAtSfE0C&pg=PA205&dq=legal+aspects+in+urban+planning+security&hl=de&ei=m-WzTu-tLMbQ4QST4vjQAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=legal%20aspects%20in%20urban%20planning%20security&f=false, p. 20-21.</ref>== |
==Types of citizen participation for use in security related urban planning consultation processes<ref>United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT) (2007): Enhancing urban safety and security. London: Earthscan. Online: http://books.google.at/books?id=SmsbwAtSfE0C&pg=PA205&dq=legal+aspects+in+urban+planning+security&hl=de&ei=m-WzTu-tLMbQ4QST4vjQAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=legal%20aspects%20in%20urban%20planning%20security&f=false, p. 20-21.</ref>== |
||
Line 51: | Line 49: | ||
* Stakeholders take full responsibility for projects that affect them directly and are willing to learn how to conduct the process from beginning to end |
* Stakeholders take full responsibility for projects that affect them directly and are willing to learn how to conduct the process from beginning to end |
||
|} |
|} |
||
− | |||
− | |||
==Citizens' participation methods useful for security related urban planning== |
==Citizens' participation methods useful for security related urban planning== |
||
− | |||
− | |||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
Line 109: | Line 103: | ||
|| || |
|| || |
||
|} |
|} |
||
− | |||
− | |||
==Links and further information== |
==Links and further information== |
||
* For research, education, training and consultancy in the field of public participation see the [http://www.brunel.ac.uk/shssc/research/ccp Centre for Citizen Participation (CCP)] [2012-10-23]. |
* For research, education, training and consultancy in the field of public participation see the [http://www.brunel.ac.uk/shssc/research/ccp Centre for Citizen Participation (CCP)] [2012-10-23]. |
||
* For general information see [http://www.iap2.org/ International Association for Public Participation] [2012-10-23].. |
* For general information see [http://www.iap2.org/ International Association for Public Participation] [2012-10-23].. |
||
− | |||
{{references}} |
{{references}} |
||
= MAP = |
= MAP = |
||
− | |||
<websiteFrame> |
<websiteFrame> |
||
− | |||
website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Citizen_participation |
website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Citizen_participation |
||
− | |||
height=1023 |
height=1023 |
||
− | |||
width=100% |
width=100% |
||
− | |||
border=0 |
border=0 |
||
− | |||
scroll=auto |
scroll=auto |
||
− | |||
align=middle |
align=middle |
||
− | |||
</websiteFrame> |
</websiteFrame> |
||
− | |||
− | |||
<headertabs/> |
<headertabs/> |
Revision as of 10:19, 7 December 2012
Contents
Citizen participation
Tracing back to classical principles of democracy, citizen participation[1] is widely accepted and appreciated in community decision making, community development and the health and social sectors. Basically, citizen volunteering and involvement are considered to balance and control political decisions, and result in decisions more beneficial to citizens and increased public acceptance.
- In security research, citizens have recently come to be regarded as the ultimate end-users of security solutions and technologies, and thus not as addressees of security measures, but as an essential group of stakeholders, that should be involved in related planning processes.
- Citizen participation in planning of security measures allows for evaluation of culture related beliefs, attitudes and risk aspects, and for identification of group specific security needs.
- Moreover, public and social perception of (in)security and risks is gaining increasing recognition in risk and security policies and decision making. Local community perception of risk situations and of security enhancing measures can be evaluated through citizen participation, and should be considered throughout the planning process.
- Citizen participation methods are useful tools to address culture aspects, legal aspects and ethics aspects in security related urban planning.
Type of participation | Concept |
---|---|
Information |
|
Consultation |
|
Consensus building |
|
Decision-making |
|
Risk-sharing |
|
Partnership |
|
Self-management |
|
Method | Culture aspects | Legal aspects | Ethics aspects |
---|---|---|---|
Activating opinion survey | X
Allows for identifying culture related risk aspects |
X | |
Advocacy planning | X | ||
Appreciative planning | X | X | |
Citizen jury | X | X | |
Cooperative discourse | X | ||
Dynamic facilitation | Allows for identifying culture aspects
and perception of (in)security and risks |
X | |
Experimental participation | X | ||
Focus group | X | X | X |
Future workshop | X | ||
Local open dialogue methods | X | X | X |
Neosocratic dialogue | X | ||
Participatory diagnosis | Allows for identifying culture aspects
and perception of (in)security and risks |
X | |
Planning for real | X
Allows for identifying culture related risk aspects |
||
Safety audit | X
Allows for identifying culture related risk aspects |
Links and further information
- For research, education, training and consultancy in the field of public participation see the Centre for Citizen Participation (CCP) [2012-10-23].
- For general information see International Association for Public Participation [2012-10-23]..
Footnotes and references
- ↑ United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT) (2007): Enhancing urban safety and security. London: Earthscan. Online: http://books.google.at/books?id=SmsbwAtSfE0C&pg=PA205&dq=legal+aspects+in+urban+planning+security&hl=de&ei=m-WzTu-tLMbQ4QST4vjQAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=legal%20aspects%20in%20urban%20planning%20security&f=false, p. 20-21.
MAP
<websiteFrame> website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Citizen_participation height=1023 width=100% border=0 scroll=auto align=middle </websiteFrame> <headertabs/>