Security issue: Pickpocketing

Lifting a wallet from a handbag without being noticed, a classic example of pickpocketing

Pickpocketing is a form of theft that involves the stealing of valuables from a victim without their noticing the theft at the time.

Description

Pickpocketing is an issue that is especially present in large cities, where crowds of people are omnipresent and distractions are plentiful. Although Barcelona and Rome were recently singled out as being particularly dangerous pickpocketing havens., pickpockets may be found in any crowded place around the world.

Contributing circumstances

Known circumstances to influence the likelihood or effect of pickpocketing, are presented in the table below:

Contributing Circumstance	Influence	Description
Lack of surveillance.	Decreases risk of detection.	A low level of surveillance, particularly round-the-clock surveillance, decreases the perceived risk of detection for a perpetrator and thereby increases the attractiveness.
Long reaction times or inadequate action of reaction force.	Decreases likelihood of apprehension	Untimely or inappropriate reactions to violence lead to a perception of little control, which will increase perceived risk for the public and decrease perceived risk for the perpetrators. Also, reducing the impact of an assault (by timely intervention) will also be impossible and lead to greater effects of incidents.
High levels of pickpocketing in the environment.	Increases likelihood of targeting.	Pickpocketers will travel to attractive locations, but typically not too far. The existence of successful pickpockets in the wider area (a radius of about 5 km), is an indication to assume the threat might also apply to the location at hand.
High levels of unemployment	Increases likelihood of targeting	High levels of unemployment are associated with higher levels of property crime.
Presence of crowds or busy places	Increases number of targets, decreases risk of apprehension	Pocket-picking is most common in places where large groups of people gather. Transportation facilities, such as bus terminals and rail-road stations, are favourite hunting grounds for pickpockets, but a department store, public arena, or city street also can supply enough potential victims.
Presence of excitement or distractions	Decreases risk of being detected	The most significant factor in the victim profile possibly may be psychological. A crowded terminal creates a distracting environment. People are packed together in cramped waiting areas listening for public announcements, watching a departure, carrying packages, or talking on a cellular telephone. The station's environment creates a sensory overload. Further, the victims, conditioned by the rush hour atmosphere of the station, are accustomed to the close physical proximity of other people.
Use of drugs or alcohol	Decreases risk of being detected	The use of drugs or alcohol decreases the vigilance of potential victims and therefore increases the chances of a pickpocket to successfully commit his or her crime.
Presence of tourists	Decreases risk of being detected	Tourists are often very recognizable and typically distracted by their surroundings. As they often also mass-visit the same locations, these locations become very busy and an ideal hunting ground for pickpockets.

Impacts

Social impact

• perception of unsafety

Economic impact

Property crimes such as pickpocketing lead to considerable costs in both a direct (primary) and a indirect (secondary) way. Direct costs of pickpocketing come in the form of:

• Preventive costs in anticipation of pickpocketing (e.g. security measures, prevention, insurance fees);
• Material and immaterial costs as a consequence of pickpocketing (e.g. physical damage, repairs, mental harm); and
• Responsive costs to pickpocketing (e.g. the costs of detection and prevention, persecution, support trial, etc.).

In addition, pickpocketing on a large scale could lead to secondary economic impact, but these effects are relatively minor compared to more serious types of crime.

Safety impact

Pickpocketing has very little impact on the safety of people.

Measures

Potential measures that can mitigate the likelihood or impact of pickpocketing include:

• Surveillance can be somewhat effective to detect pickpocketing and if overt, to deter potential criminals by raising the perceived risk of apprehension. It can incur high costs if implemented as dedicated observers, either on location or remote. A more natural form of surveillance is surveillance by the inhabitants (also known as 'natural surveillance'), usually by warning for pickpockets. Be aware that putting out warning signs can also have detrimental effects , as is illustrated by Ekblom who cites the example of pickpockets on the London Underground who stationed themselves near signs warning of theft to see which pockets were checked by passengers on reading the signs.
• Reaction force should be swift and effective in order to make detection measures, such as alarms or surveillance, effective and convey the notion that pickpocketing will not be left unpunished.
• Directing traffic flows can be effective in preventing crowding. The effectiveness of this measure is illustrated by a case study which shows that thefts from shopping bags at markets in Birmingham, England, were substantially reduced by reducing congestion around the

stalls, which increased the difficulty of pickpocketing and other "stealth" thefts.

• Target removal is not always feasible, but by for example suppressing tourist to visit a particular location, pickpocketing at that location can be effectively reduced. Another example of how to remove targets is to minimize distraction for visitors, by for example placing clear signposts or designing the area to minimize congestion.