Difference between revisions of "Sociospatial perspective"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Text replace - " " to " ") |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
In the sociospatial perspective, built environment is intrinsically meaningful, it has its particular “semiotics” that tell about policy, culture, society, economy, etc., and also about security. |
In the sociospatial perspective, built environment is intrinsically meaningful, it has its particular “semiotics” that tell about policy, culture, society, economy, etc., and also about security. |
||
| − | |||
==Interaction of urban structures and society== |
==Interaction of urban structures and society== |
||
On the bottom line, urban structure has an impact on social processes, and this needs to be addressed in strategic [[urban planning]]<ref>Hannigan, J. (1998): Fantasy City: Pleasure and Profit in the Postmodern Metropolis. Routledge: London. </ref>. The school of “[[New urbanism|New Urbanism]]” has referred to this as the “sociospatial perspective”. This means that urban space and society interact. |
On the bottom line, urban structure has an impact on social processes, and this needs to be addressed in strategic [[urban planning]]<ref>Hannigan, J. (1998): Fantasy City: Pleasure and Profit in the Postmodern Metropolis. Routledge: London. </ref>. The school of “[[New urbanism|New Urbanism]]” has referred to this as the “sociospatial perspective”. This means that urban space and society interact. |
||
| − | |||
==Security related aspects== |
==Security related aspects== |
||
| Line 15: | Line 13: | ||
* Critics: Urbanization studies strongly argue that differences between actual and perceived security are not influenced by the design of built environment but that they mainly are mass media constructs. The perception of (in)security in cities rather depends "[...] ''upon the substantial amount and constant flow of information that urban residents receive from many sources''”<ref>United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Enhancing urban safety and security. London: Earthscan, 2007, p. 19. Online: http://books.google.at/books?id=SmsbwAtSfE0C&pg=PA205&dq=legal+aspects+in+urban+planning+security&hl=de&ei=m-WzTu-tLMbQ4QST4vjQAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=legal%20aspects%20in%20urban%20planning%20security&f=false </ref>. |
* Critics: Urbanization studies strongly argue that differences between actual and perceived security are not influenced by the design of built environment but that they mainly are mass media constructs. The perception of (in)security in cities rather depends "[...] ''upon the substantial amount and constant flow of information that urban residents receive from many sources''”<ref>United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Enhancing urban safety and security. London: Earthscan, 2007, p. 19. Online: http://books.google.at/books?id=SmsbwAtSfE0C&pg=PA205&dq=legal+aspects+in+urban+planning+security&hl=de&ei=m-WzTu-tLMbQ4QST4vjQAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=legal%20aspects%20in%20urban%20planning%20security&f=false </ref>. |
||
* Many examples of community-enhancing constructions represent an “''elitism of architectural choice''”<ref>M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 331.</ref> that may in the end increase societal gaps and perceptions of fear, as well as actual insecurity. |
* Many examples of community-enhancing constructions represent an “''elitism of architectural choice''”<ref>M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 331.</ref> that may in the end increase societal gaps and perceptions of fear, as well as actual insecurity. |
||
| − | |||
==Approaches how to address it== |
==Approaches how to address it== |
||
| Line 23: | Line 20: | ||
* Integrate society into urban planning and into urbanity; |
* Integrate society into urban planning and into urbanity; |
||
* Integrate approaches and findings from social sciences and humanities. |
* Integrate approaches and findings from social sciences and humanities. |
||
| − | |||
==Related subjects== |
==Related subjects== |
||
Revision as of 10:24, 7 December 2012
Contents
Sociospatial perspective
The sociospatial perspective assumes that “social space operates as both a product and a producer of changes in the metropolitan environment”[1].
In the sociospatial perspective, built environment is intrinsically meaningful, it has its particular “semiotics” that tell about policy, culture, society, economy, etc., and also about security.
Interaction of urban structures and society
On the bottom line, urban structure has an impact on social processes, and this needs to be addressed in strategic urban planning[2]. The school of “New Urbanism” has referred to this as the “sociospatial perspective”. This means that urban space and society interact.
- Design features of urban infrastructure influence citizens’ perception of the risk, that this infrastructure is at, as well as the general perception of criticality of that infrastructure.
- Critics: Urbanization studies strongly argue that differences between actual and perceived security are not influenced by the design of built environment but that they mainly are mass media constructs. The perception of (in)security in cities rather depends "[...] upon the substantial amount and constant flow of information that urban residents receive from many sources”[3].
- Many examples of community-enhancing constructions represent an “elitism of architectural choice”[4] that may in the end increase societal gaps and perceptions of fear, as well as actual insecurity.
Approaches how to address it
- Consider interactions of society with urban space;
- Consider social needs;
- Involve citizens in planning projects (citizen participation);
- Integrate society into urban planning and into urbanity;
- Integrate approaches and findings from social sciences and humanities.
Related subjects
- Cultural criminology
- Environmental design
- Environmental psychology
- New Urbanism
- Designing out
- Designing in
- Resilience, societal resilience;
- Perception of (in)security and of the criticality of infrastructure.
Footnotes and references
- ↑ M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 394; see also p. 20.
- ↑ Hannigan, J. (1998): Fantasy City: Pleasure and Profit in the Postmodern Metropolis. Routledge: London.
- ↑ United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Enhancing urban safety and security. London: Earthscan, 2007, p. 19. Online: http://books.google.at/books?id=SmsbwAtSfE0C&pg=PA205&dq=legal+aspects+in+urban+planning+security&hl=de&ei=m-WzTu-tLMbQ4QST4vjQAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=legal%20aspects%20in%20urban%20planning%20security&f=false
- ↑ M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 331.
MAP
<websiteFrame> website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Sociospatial perspective height=1023 width=100% border=0 scroll=auto align=middle </websiteFrame>
<headertabs/>
