Difference between revisions of "Environmental psychology"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Text replace - " " to " ") |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* The meaning intentionally embodied in built environment is not always decoded by citizens as intended. |
* The meaning intentionally embodied in built environment is not always decoded by citizens as intended. |
||
* The identification of “weak points”/insecurities in urban environments takes place in cultural contexts<ref>J. Falkheimer/H. Mats: Multicultural Crisis Communication: Towards a Social Constructionist Perspective. In: Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 14, no. 4., 2006.</ref>. It is socially negotiated and/or constructed. |
* The identification of “weak points”/insecurities in urban environments takes place in cultural contexts<ref>J. Falkheimer/H. Mats: Multicultural Crisis Communication: Towards a Social Constructionist Perspective. In: Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 14, no. 4., 2006.</ref>. It is socially negotiated and/or constructed. |
||
| − | |||
==Approaches how to address it== |
==Approaches how to address it== |
||
| Line 26: | Line 25: | ||
* Urban design should “incorporate public meanings” and citizens’ images of places, including those of “secure” or “safe” places<ref>J. L. Nasar: Environmental psychology and urban design. In: T. Banerjee/A. Loukaitou-Sideris (eds.): Companion to Urban Design. London/New York: Routledge, 2011, pp. 162-174, p. 166.</ref>. |
* Urban design should “incorporate public meanings” and citizens’ images of places, including those of “secure” or “safe” places<ref>J. L. Nasar: Environmental psychology and urban design. In: T. Banerjee/A. Loukaitou-Sideris (eds.): Companion to Urban Design. London/New York: Routledge, 2011, pp. 162-174, p. 166.</ref>. |
||
* Desire for security should not inform urban planning to contribute to threatening citizens’ rights of expression and dissent<ref>Cf. C. Whitzman: Secure cities. In: T. Banerjee/A. Loukaitou-Sideris (eds.): Companion to Urban Design. London/New York: Routledge, 2011, pp. 670-671.</ref>. |
* Desire for security should not inform urban planning to contribute to threatening citizens’ rights of expression and dissent<ref>Cf. C. Whitzman: Secure cities. In: T. Banerjee/A. Loukaitou-Sideris (eds.): Companion to Urban Design. London/New York: Routledge, 2011, pp. 670-671.</ref>. |
||
| − | |||
==Related subjects== |
==Related subjects== |
||
| Line 40: | Line 38: | ||
*[[Resilience]] |
*[[Resilience]] |
||
*[[Vulnerability]] |
*[[Vulnerability]] |
||
| − | |||
{{references}} |
{{references}} |
||
Revision as of 10:22, 7 December 2012
Contents
Environmental psychology
Environmental psychology[1] focuses on the interplay between society/social individua and their (structural) surroundings. The term "environment" encompasses natural environment as well as built environment, but also social settings and learning and informational environments. Environmental psychology is both value and problem oriented and addresses the complexity of societal problems on the basis of human-environment interactions and the perception of environment.
- Urban environment impacts social behaviour in a positive or negative way.
- Security or resilience is determined by (urban) environment and the interactions with society/humans.
But:
- Security or resilience cannot just be designed by way of planning.
- Environmental/security/risk cognition cannot be designed.
- The meaning intentionally embodied in built environment is not always decoded by citizens as intended.
- The identification of “weak points”/insecurities in urban environments takes place in cultural contexts[2]. It is socially negotiated and/or constructed.
Approaches how to address it
- Consider interactions between (urban) environment and social behaviour/reactions.
- Consider local/regional security culture in planning projects.
- Consider local/regional perception of (in)security/risks in planning projects.
- Involve citizens in the planning process (see citizen participation).
- Urban design should avoid stressful and potentially threatening feelings of being lost in large buildings[3].
- Urban design should “incorporate public meanings” and citizens’ images of places, including those of “secure” or “safe” places[4].
- Desire for security should not inform urban planning to contribute to threatening citizens’ rights of expression and dissent[5].
Related subjects
- Ecological perspective
- Environmental design
- New urbanism
- Designing out/designing in
- Culture aspects
- Security culture
- Securitization
- Perception of (in)security/risks
- Ethics aspects
- Resilience
- Vulnerability
Footnotes and references
- ↑ E.g. J. L. Nasar: Environmental psychology and urban design. In: T. Banerjee/A. Loukaitou-Sideris (eds.): Companion to Urban Design. London/New York: Routledge, 2011, pp. 162-174.
- ↑ J. Falkheimer/H. Mats: Multicultural Crisis Communication: Towards a Social Constructionist Perspective. In: Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 14, no. 4., 2006.
- ↑ K. Lynch: The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960.
- ↑ J. L. Nasar: Environmental psychology and urban design. In: T. Banerjee/A. Loukaitou-Sideris (eds.): Companion to Urban Design. London/New York: Routledge, 2011, pp. 162-174, p. 166.
- ↑ Cf. C. Whitzman: Secure cities. In: T. Banerjee/A. Loukaitou-Sideris (eds.): Companion to Urban Design. London/New York: Routledge, 2011, pp. 670-671.
MAP
<websiteFrame> website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Environmental_psychology height=1023 width=100% border=0 scroll=auto align=middle </websiteFrame>
<headertabs/>
