Difference between revisions of "Protection against graffiti"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "25px|right|This is a help page for the SecuRbAn risk assessment toolThe '''protection level against graffiti''' question in Securban concerns the measure ty...") |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:i.png|25px|right|This is a help page for the SecuRbAn risk assessment tool]]The '''protection level against [[graffiti]]''' question in Securban concerns the measure types |
[[File:i.png|25px|right|This is a help page for the SecuRbAn risk assessment tool]]The '''protection level against [[graffiti]]''' question in Securban concerns the measure types |
||
+ | * [[Measure: Target hardening|Target hardening]] by for example impregnating walls with paint-resistant coatings or making particularly attractive walls hard to reach can greatly increase the effort needed to vandalise the object and thereby reduce the attractiveness of an object. |
||
− | * [[Measure: Directing traffic flows|Directing traffic flows]] to |
+ | * [[Measure: Directing traffic flows|Directing traffic flows]] to reduce the chance for potential graffiti artists to approach vulnerable areas, reducing the visibility of potential targets to criminals. |
− | * [[Measure: Target removal|Target removal]] by removing |
+ | * [[Measure: Target removal|Target removal]] by removing the attractive elements of particularly vulnerable objects from high-risk locations. |
− | * [[Measure: Controlling disinhibitors|Controlling disinhibitors]] such as alcohol to decrease the problem. |
||
+ | * [[Measure: Deflection| Deflection]] by providing a legal place to perform graffiti. |
||
− | * [[Measure: Access control|Access control]] possibly combined with [[Measure: Screening|Screening]] where possible and ethical, to prevent unauthorised access of potential or known offenders. |
||
The score is divided into three categories in Securban: |
The score is divided into three categories in Securban: |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
As these categories are not exhaustive, and many intermediate protection levels exist, in answering the question, one will have to choose the level that comes closest to the actual level. |
As these categories are not exhaustive, and many intermediate protection levels exist, in answering the question, one will have to choose the level that comes closest to the actual level. |
||
− | All other measure types against [[ |
+ | All other measure types against [[graffiti]] (such as surveillance) are covered in other answers in Securban and should not be considered in answering this question. |
Latest revision as of 17:08, 15 August 2013
The protection level against graffiti question in Securban concerns the measure types
- Target hardening by for example impregnating walls with paint-resistant coatings or making particularly attractive walls hard to reach can greatly increase the effort needed to vandalise the object and thereby reduce the attractiveness of an object.
- Directing traffic flows to reduce the chance for potential graffiti artists to approach vulnerable areas, reducing the visibility of potential targets to criminals.
- Target removal by removing the attractive elements of particularly vulnerable objects from high-risk locations.
- Deflection by providing a legal place to perform graffiti.
The score is divided into three categories in Securban:
- Neither of the measure types are taken to prevent graffiti.
- One of the measure types is taken to prevent graffiti.
- More than one of the measure types are taken to prevent graffiti.
As these categories are not exhaustive, and many intermediate protection levels exist, in answering the question, one will have to choose the level that comes closest to the actual level.
All other measure types against graffiti (such as surveillance) are covered in other answers in Securban and should not be considered in answering this question.