Difference between revisions of "Planning for Real"

From Securipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "= Short description = Planning for Real is a community-oriented planning procedure designed to activate people (the idea is “It’s our place – let’s take matters into o...")
 
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
[[Category:Social]]
= Short description =
 
  +
[[Category:Threat]]
Planning for Real is a community-oriented planning procedure designed to activate people (the idea is “It’s our place – let’s take matters into our own hands”). The process consists of a number of steps, each with differing opportunities for communication and participation: initiative, model, presentation, ”Who can do what?”, pooling suggestions, setting up working groups, priorities and scheduling, plan of campaign.
 
  +
'''Planning for Real''' is a [[citizen participation]] method to determine [[Culture aspects|risk aspects in a cultural context]] for security-related urban planning. Planning for Real is an activating and community-focused approach.
   
 
The aim is to lessen difficulties in communicating between individuals affected in different ways, to bring out latent potential, resources and deficits as well as to create an atmosphere of cooperative action among neighbours, experts, and local interest groups.
= Process =
 
The aim is to lessen difficulties in communicating between individuals affected in different ways, to bring out latent potential, resources and deficits, and to create an atmosphere of cooperative action among neighbors, experts and local interest groups.
 
   
 
==Process description==
=Help in addressing cultural/ethical aspects in planning of secure public spaces=
 
  +
''Planning for Real'' is a multiple step process in the following order:
The method is used for:
 
  +
* Setting up working groups, priorities and schedules, and campaign plans using several steps of communication and participation;
* encouraging ordinary citizens to get involved in structuring their surroundings or their workplace;
 
  +
* Activating engagement and planning responsibility for the used and inhabited surroundings;
* minimizing obstacles to communication;
 
  +
* Pooling suggestions.
* tapping existing local resources;
 
* identifying and solving risk aspect through common planning.
 
   
 
==How does it support in planning of secure public spaces?==
=Further information=
 
 
The method is useful for:
''Participation & sustainable development in Europe'', http://www.partizipation.at/planning-real.html
 
 
* Encouraging ordinary citizens to get involved in structuring their surroundings or their workplace;
 
* Minimizing obstacles to (risk) communication;
  +
* Optimizing [[risk communication]];
 
* Tapping existing local resources;
 
* Identifying and solving risk aspects through common planning;
  +
* Identifying cultural views and [[perception of (in)security and risks]].
  +
  +
==Links and further reading==
 
* Participation & Sustainable Development in Europe. Retrieved from: http://www.partizipation.at/planning-real.html [last access: 2012-08-18].
  +
* Planning for Real®: Supporting communities to bring about change and shape their neighbourhoods. Retrieved from: http://www.planningforreal.org.uk/ [last access: 2012-08-16].

Latest revision as of 01:25, 8 January 2016

Planning for Real is a citizen participation method to determine risk aspects in a cultural context for security-related urban planning. Planning for Real is an activating and community-focused approach.

The aim is to lessen difficulties in communicating between individuals affected in different ways, to bring out latent potential, resources and deficits as well as to create an atmosphere of cooperative action among neighbours, experts, and local interest groups.

Process description

Planning for Real is a multiple step process in the following order:

  • Setting up working groups, priorities and schedules, and campaign plans using several steps of communication and participation;
  • Activating engagement and planning responsibility for the used and inhabited surroundings;
  • Pooling suggestions.

How does it support in planning of secure public spaces?

The method is useful for:

  • Encouraging ordinary citizens to get involved in structuring their surroundings or their workplace;
  • Minimizing obstacles to (risk) communication;
  • Optimizing risk communication;
  • Tapping existing local resources;
  • Identifying and solving risk aspects through common planning;
  • Identifying cultural views and perception of (in)security and risks.

Links and further reading