Difference between revisions of "Planning for Real"

From Securipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
[[Category:Social]]
=Planning for Real=
 
  +
[[Category:Threat]]
  +
'''Planning for Real''' is a [[citizen participation]] method to determine [[Culture aspects|risk aspects in a cultural context]] for security-related urban planning. Planning for Real is an activating and community-focused approach.
   
 
The aim is to lessen difficulties in communicating between individuals affected in different ways, to bring out latent potential, resources and deficits as well as to create an atmosphere of cooperative action among neighbours, experts, and local interest groups.
== Short description ==
 
Planning for Real<ref>Participation & sustainable development in Europe, http://www.partizipation.at/planning-real.html; Planning for Real®: http://www.planningforreal.org.uk/default.html</ref> is a community-oriented planning procedure designed to activate people (the idea is “It’s our place – let’s take matters into our own hands”). The process consists of a number of steps, each with differing opportunities for communication and participation: initiative, model, presentation, ”Who can do what?”, pooling suggestions, setting up working groups, priorities and scheduling, plan of campaign.
 
   
 
==Process description==
  +
''Planning for Real'' is a multiple step process in the following order:
  +
* Setting up working groups, priorities and schedules, and campaign plans using several steps of communication and participation;
  +
* Activating engagement and planning responsibility for the used and inhabited surroundings;
  +
* Pooling suggestions.
   
 
==How does it support in planning of secure public spaces?==
== Process ==
 
 
The method is useful for:
The aim is to lessen difficulties in communicating between individuals affected in different ways, to bring out latent potential, resources and deficits, and to create an atmosphere of cooperative action among neighbors, experts and local interest groups.
 
 
* Encouraging ordinary citizens to get involved in structuring their surroundings or their workplace;
 
* Minimizing obstacles to (risk) communication;
  +
* Optimizing [[risk communication]];
 
* Tapping existing local resources;
 
* Identifying and solving risk aspects through common planning;
  +
* Identifying cultural views and [[perception of (in)security and risks]].
   
  +
==Links and further reading==
 
  +
* Participation & Sustainable Development in Europe. Retrieved from: http://www.partizipation.at/planning-real.html [last access: 2012-08-18].
==Help in addressing cultural/ethical aspects in planning of secure public spaces==
 
  +
* Planning for Real®: Supporting communities to bring about change and shape their neighbourhoods. Retrieved from: http://www.planningforreal.org.uk/ [last access: 2012-08-16].
The method is used for:
 
* encouraging ordinary citizens to get involved in structuring their surroundings or their workplace;
 
* minimizing obstacles to communication;
 
* tapping existing local resources;
 
* identifying and solving risk aspect through common planning.
 
 
 
{{references}}
 
 
 
= MAP =
 
 
<websiteFrame>
 
 
website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Planning_for_Real
 
 
height=1023
 
 
width=100%
 
 
border=0
 
 
scroll=auto
 
 
align=middle
 
 
</websiteFrame>
 
 
 
 
<headertabs/>
 

Latest revision as of 01:25, 8 January 2016

Planning for Real is a citizen participation method to determine risk aspects in a cultural context for security-related urban planning. Planning for Real is an activating and community-focused approach.

The aim is to lessen difficulties in communicating between individuals affected in different ways, to bring out latent potential, resources and deficits as well as to create an atmosphere of cooperative action among neighbours, experts, and local interest groups.

Process description

Planning for Real is a multiple step process in the following order:

  • Setting up working groups, priorities and schedules, and campaign plans using several steps of communication and participation;
  • Activating engagement and planning responsibility for the used and inhabited surroundings;
  • Pooling suggestions.

How does it support in planning of secure public spaces?

The method is useful for:

  • Encouraging ordinary citizens to get involved in structuring their surroundings or their workplace;
  • Minimizing obstacles to (risk) communication;
  • Optimizing risk communication;
  • Tapping existing local resources;
  • Identifying and solving risk aspects through common planning;
  • Identifying cultural views and perception of (in)security and risks.

Links and further reading