Difference between revisions of "Determination of security aspects - methods for urban planners"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "=Aspect determination methods for urban planners= ==Introduction== t.b.e. =Methods to determine risk aspects of the public security culture= {| class="wikitable" |- ! '''Me...") |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Process: Key individuals and residents are interviewed, material is evaluated and observations are made. |
Process: Key individuals and residents are interviewed, material is evaluated and observations are made. |
||
Residents are informed in writing about the actual survey in advance; trained interviewers use an interview skeleton with open questions to do one-to-one interviews. |
Residents are informed in writing about the actual survey in advance; trained interviewers use an interview skeleton with open questions to do one-to-one interviews. |
||
− | In contrast to most conventional surveys, an activating opinion survey is not a one-off event, but the kick-off to a fairly long-term process; so it involves a good deal of organization in advance and subsequent work. |
+ | In contrast to most conventional surveys, an activating opinion survey is not a one-off event, but the kick-off to a fairly long-term process; so it involves a good deal of organization in advance and subsequent work. |
+ | || The aim is to identify the residents’ fears, wishes and worries; at the same time they are asked what solutions occur to them, and how interested they would be in taking part in implementing the ideas in question. |
||
*Suitable for finding out the interests and needs of people living in a particular area || The survey is evaluated and the results presented to the residents, with the aim of defining steps toward realization. Interest or action groups are formed with a view to this. |
*Suitable for finding out the interests and needs of people living in a particular area || The survey is evaluated and the results presented to the residents, with the aim of defining steps toward realization. Interest or action groups are formed with a view to this. |
||
|- |
|- |
Revision as of 16:46, 21 March 2012
Contents
Aspect determination methods for urban planners
Introduction
t.b.e.
Methods to determine risk aspects of the public security culture
Method | Description | Security/legal/ethical aspects in planning of public spaces | How does the method determine security/legal/ethical aspects in planning of public spaces? |
---|---|---|---|
Activating opinion survey[1] | In an activating opinion survey residents are asked about their views and attitudes; at the same time they are encouraged to stand up for their interests and to take part in developing solutions for their surroundings.
Process: Key individuals and residents are interviewed, material is evaluated and observations are made. Residents are informed in writing about the actual survey in advance; trained interviewers use an interview skeleton with open questions to do one-to-one interviews. In contrast to most conventional surveys, an activating opinion survey is not a one-off event, but the kick-off to a fairly long-term process; so it involves a good deal of organization in advance and subsequent work. |
The aim is to identify the residents’ fears, wishes and worries; at the same time they are asked what solutions occur to them, and how interested they would be in taking part in implementing the ideas in question.
| |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Footnotes and references
- ↑ Participation & sustainable development in Europe: http://www.partizipation.at/activating-opinion.html