Difference between revisions of "Civic culture"

From Securipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
• Culture aspects often considered in urban planning relate to providing for coexistence of commerce and civic culture as well as to ‘building in’ space for the fine arts and public ‘cultural’ plain (e.g. parks as open museums).
 
• Culture aspects often considered in urban planning relate to providing for coexistence of commerce and civic culture as well as to ‘building in’ space for the fine arts and public ‘cultural’ plain (e.g. parks as open museums).
   
  +
==Security related aspects and benefits==
   
 
The use of civic culture in addressing security aspects related to urban planning
 
# reduces inequality and social tension;
 
# incorporates the knowledge, productivity, social and physical capital of the poor in city development;
 
# increases local ownership of development processes and programmes.<ref>United Nations UN Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Inclusive and Sustainable Urban Planning: A Guide for Municipalities. In: UNON Publishing Service Section, 2007, Volume 1, p. 20. </ref>
   
   
  +
Or vice versa: if unaddressed, social inequalities and tension can arise/grow and result in anti-social or criminal behaviour.
   
   
  +
==Approaches how to address it==
 
  +
* Involve citizens in planning process
 
  +
* Involve different parties and interest groups
 
  +
* Encourage locals to express their needs and expectations/requests
==Use of civic culture in security related urban planning==
 
Use of '''civic culture''' by [[citizen participation]] in addressing security aspects related to [[urban planning]]
 
*reduces inequality and social tension;
 
*incorporates the knowledge, productivity, social and physical capital of the poor in city development;
 
*increases local ownership of development processes and programmes.<ref>United Nations UN Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Inclusive and Sustainable Urban Planning: A Guide for Municipalities. In: UNON Publishing Service Section, 2007, Volume 1, p. 20. </ref>
 
 
   
 
This can be realized by several public participation methods and checklists to integrate different [[security]] aspects, [[Legal_aspects|legal aspects]] and [[Ethics_aspects|ethics aspects]] into the strategic planning of public spaces:
 
This can be realized by several public participation methods and checklists to integrate different [[security]] aspects, [[Legal_aspects|legal aspects]] and [[Ethics_aspects|ethics aspects]] into the strategic planning of public spaces:
Line 32: Line 33:
 
*Dimensions to consider in order to enhance citizens perception of safety in urban crowded places;
 
*Dimensions to consider in order to enhance citizens perception of safety in urban crowded places;
   
  +
The purpose is to develop participatory knowledge and “create contexts in which planners and multicultural groups can continuously learn and experiment, think systematically, engage in meaningful dialogue, and create visions that energize action and inclusion in city planning.”<ref>S. Ameyaw: Appreciative Planning: An Approach to Planning with Diverse Ethnic and Cultural Groups. In: M. A. Burayidi (ed.): Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society, Westport: Praeger, 2000, pp. 101-114, p. 101. </ref>
 
   
 
{{references}}
 
{{references}}

Revision as of 13:40, 11 October 2012


Civic culture

The civic culture concept goes back to Almond and Verba’s study on political culture and the role of participants[1]. They categorized and identified three ideal types of ‘pure’ political culture types (parochial/subject/participant). Civic culture is understood to mix the ideal elements of each. Commonly considered cultural aspects in urban planning relate to providing for coexistence of commerce and civic culture and to ‘building in’ space for the fine arts and public ‘cultural’ plain (e.g. parks as open museums).


• The concept is understood to mix the ideal elements of the categorized and identified three ideal types of ‘pure’ political culture types (parochial/subject/participant). • Culture aspects often considered in urban planning relate to providing for coexistence of commerce and civic culture as well as to ‘building in’ space for the fine arts and public ‘cultural’ plain (e.g. parks as open museums).

Security related aspects and benefits

The use of civic culture in addressing security aspects related to urban planning

  1. reduces inequality and social tension;
  2. incorporates the knowledge, productivity, social and physical capital of the poor in city development;
  3. increases local ownership of development processes and programmes.[2]


Or vice versa: if unaddressed, social inequalities and tension can arise/grow and result in anti-social or criminal behaviour.


Approaches how to address it

  • Involve citizens in planning process
  • Involve different parties and interest groups
  • Encourage locals to express their needs and expectations/requests

This can be realized by several public participation methods and checklists to integrate different security aspects, legal aspects and ethics aspects into the strategic planning of public spaces:

  • Methods to determine risk aspects of the public security culture;
  • Methods to determine legal aspects in planning of public spaces;
  • Methods to determine ethical aspects in planning of public spaces;
  • Dimensions to consider in order to enhance citizens perception of safety in urban crowded places;


Footnotes and references

  1. Almond, G. A./Verba, S. (1963): The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. University of Princeton Press: Princeton, NJ.
  2. United Nations UN Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Inclusive and Sustainable Urban Planning: A Guide for Municipalities. In: UNON Publishing Service Section, 2007, Volume 1, p. 20.

MAP

<websiteFrame> website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Civic_culture height=1023 width=100% border=0 scroll=auto align=middle </websiteFrame>

<headertabs/>