Determination of security aspects - methods for urban planners
Contents
Aspect determination methods for urban planners
Introduction
t.b.e.
Methods to determine risk aspects of the public security culture
Method | Description | Security/legal/ethical aspects in planning of public spaces | How does the method determine security/legal/ethical aspects in planning of public spaces? |
---|---|---|---|
Activating opinion survey[1] | In an activating opinion survey residents are asked about their views and attitudes; at the same time they are encouraged to stand up for their interests and to take part in developing solutions for their surroundings.
Process: Key individuals and residents are interviewed, material is evaluated and observations are made. Residents are informed in writing about the actual survey in advance; trained interviewers use an interview skeleton with open questions to do one-to-one interviews. In contrast to most conventional surveys, an activating opinion survey is not a one-off event, but the kick-off to a fairly long-term process; so it involves a good deal of organization in advance and subsequent work. |
The aim is to identify the residents’ fears, wishes and worries; at the same time they are asked what solutions occur to them, and how interested they would be in taking part in implementing the ideas in question.
|
The survey is evaluated and the results presented to the residents, with the aim of defining steps toward realization. Interest or action groups are formed with a view to this. |
Safety Audit[2] | The safety audit is a leading tool originally designed by the Metropolitan Action Committee on Violence Against Women and Children (METRAC) in Toronto for women to use in order to build their skills and make their communities feel safer.
Process: Usually, a women’s safety audit starts with a group of women, and possibly other community members, who meet and discuss spaces in their community that feel unsafe. Safety audit groups generally work best when members are diverse and therefore represent a variety of safety concerns (i.e. younger and older women, disabled women, women from different ethnic backgrounds). Unsafe spaces might include a shopping centre parking lot, a pathway between residences, a water source, or a public housing development. After the safety audit group has chosen an unsafe space, they go together to that space and note the factors or characteristics that they think make it unsafe (usually with the help of a premade checklist). Once a safety audit has been completed, the group makes a series of recommendations to their local government and other community members to try and improve the space. |
Factors or characteristics that make a space feel unsafe might include poor lighting, negative graffiti messages, or an isolated location.
View checklist: http://www.endvawnow.org/en/articles/262-ask-questions-about-womens-safety-in-the-city.html |
Safety audits encourage local and context-specific solutions to issues of insecurity and promote partnerships and joint solutions between women and their local governments. Women’s safety audits are now said to be an internationally recognized practice that can equip women and communities to identify what corrective measures are needed to improve personal safety in urban settings. |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Footnotes and references
- ↑ Participation & sustainable development in Europe: http://www.partizipation.at/activating-opinion.html
- ↑ UN Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women: http://www.endvawnow.org/en/articles/262-ask-questions-about-womens-safety-in-the-city.html