Difference between revisions of "The economics of criminal and terrorist behaviour"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Economic theory is based on the assumption that criminals and terrorists (even suicidal bombers) behave like rational economic agents<ref>A rational economic agent is an agent with clear preferences, who models uncertainty via expected values, and "always chooses to perform the action that results in the optimal outcome for itself from among all feasible actions" (Source: Wikipedia). A rational agent is also referred to as the Homo Economicus</ref>, which implies that they face a well defined set of preferences, and will select their preferred choice of action to maximize their [[utility]] within a given resource restraint<ref> Enders and Sandler (2006)</ref>. Consequently, economic theory predicts that a change in the relative price (due to for example security measures) will result in a shift of criminal and terrorist action towards the relatively cheaper activity (legal or not legal). |
Economic theory is based on the assumption that criminals and terrorists (even suicidal bombers) behave like rational economic agents<ref>A rational economic agent is an agent with clear preferences, who models uncertainty via expected values, and "always chooses to perform the action that results in the optimal outcome for itself from among all feasible actions" (Source: Wikipedia). A rational agent is also referred to as the Homo Economicus</ref>, which implies that they face a well defined set of preferences, and will select their preferred choice of action to maximize their [[utility]] within a given resource restraint<ref> Enders and Sandler (2006)</ref>. Consequently, economic theory predicts that a change in the relative price (due to for example security measures) will result in a shift of criminal and terrorist action towards the relatively cheaper activity (legal or not legal). |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | Economic scholars distinguish (see '''clickable map''' below): |
||
| + | In general, the economics of terrorist behaviour is closely related to the economics of criminal behaviour. Both theories assume a rational economic agent, a socio-economic background and a dynamic interaction between the criminal/terrorist and its counterpart. However, where crime is in most cases solely related to socio-economic factors such as poverty, wage and income inequality, level of education, etc., the roots of terrorism can be found in economic factors, but also political (e.g. repression) and/or social factors (e.g. religious, ethnic, geography). |
||
| − | <imagemap> |
||
| − | Image:Economics_of_behaviour.png|330 px |
||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | rect 284 2 494 95 [[The economics of crime|Economics of crime]] |
||
| − | rect 282 178 494 271 [[The economics of terrorist behaviour|Economics of terrorist behaviour]] |
||
| − | |||
| − | desc bottom-left |
||
| − | </imagemap> |
||
== Related subjects == |
== Related subjects == |
||
Revision as of 12:14, 14 November 2012
Contents
The economics of criminal and terrorist behaviour
The economics of criminal and terrorist behaviour deals with the effect of incentives on criminal and terrorist behaviour and the possible measures to reduce threats. Economic models not only predict and explain the behaviour of criminals and terrorists, but can also be used to describe the causes of crime and terrorism and the dynamic interaction between criminals/terrorists and security measures.
Rational economic agents
Economic theory is based on the assumption that criminals and terrorists (even suicidal bombers) behave like rational economic agents[1], which implies that they face a well defined set of preferences, and will select their preferred choice of action to maximize their utility within a given resource restraint[2]. Consequently, economic theory predicts that a change in the relative price (due to for example security measures) will result in a shift of criminal and terrorist action towards the relatively cheaper activity (legal or not legal).
The economics of criminal behaviour and terrorist behaviour
In general, the economics of terrorist behaviour is closely related to the economics of criminal behaviour. Both theories assume a rational economic agent, a socio-economic background and a dynamic interaction between the criminal/terrorist and its counterpart. However, where crime is in most cases solely related to socio-economic factors such as poverty, wage and income inequality, level of education, etc., the roots of terrorism can be found in economic factors, but also political (e.g. repression) and/or social factors (e.g. religious, ethnic, geography).
Related subjects
The economics of terrorist and criminal behaviour relates to:
- The economic impacts of security threats (crime & terrorism)
- The economic impacts of security measures
For other related subjects, see the clickable map below:
Error: Image is invalid or non-existent.
Footnotes and references
- ↑ A rational economic agent is an agent with clear preferences, who models uncertainty via expected values, and "always chooses to perform the action that results in the optimal outcome for itself from among all feasible actions" (Source: Wikipedia). A rational agent is also referred to as the Homo Economicus
- ↑ Enders and Sandler (2006)
MAP
<websiteFrame> website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=The_economics_of_criminal_and_terrorist_behaviour height=1023 width=100% border=0 scroll=auto align=middle </websiteFrame>
<headertabs/>
