Difference between revisions of "Securitisation"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| − | "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Securitization_%28international_relations%29 Securitization]" |
+ | "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Securitization_%28international_relations%29 Securitization]" is a process-oriented conception of [[security]] in the context of international security policy. The securitization concept is embedded in the social constructivism with Ole Waever and Barry Buzan as leading theorists ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_School_%28international_relations%29 Copenhagen School]): Security is not an objective state, but results from social processes; security is socially (and/or politically) constructed. |
"Securitization", or "de-securitization", expresses which aspects of life are going to be – or not to be – transformed into and perceived as security-related matters in the future. For example corruption could be perceived as a prior economic issue, as a prior criminal justice issue, or as a prior security issue. A cross-cutting aspect is the cultural selection of risks and [[security culture]]. |
"Securitization", or "de-securitization", expresses which aspects of life are going to be – or not to be – transformed into and perceived as security-related matters in the future. For example corruption could be perceived as a prior economic issue, as a prior criminal justice issue, or as a prior security issue. A cross-cutting aspect is the cultural selection of risks and [[security culture]]. |
||
Revision as of 07:46, 3 August 2012
Securitization
"Securitization" is a process-oriented conception of security in the context of international security policy. The securitization concept is embedded in the social constructivism with Ole Waever and Barry Buzan as leading theorists (Copenhagen School): Security is not an objective state, but results from social processes; security is socially (and/or politically) constructed.
"Securitization", or "de-securitization", expresses which aspects of life are going to be – or not to be – transformed into and perceived as security-related matters in the future. For example corruption could be perceived as a prior economic issue, as a prior criminal justice issue, or as a prior security issue. A cross-cutting aspect is the cultural selection of risks and security culture.
"Securitized" agenda examples are:
- Environmental security;
- Data protection and data security;
- Cyber security;
- Societal security;
- Climate change;
- Migration;
- etc.
Further reading
- Waever Ole (1998): Securitization and Desecuritization. In: Lipschutz Ronnie (ed.)(1998): On Security. New York: Columbia University Press. Retrieved from: http://library.northsouth.edu/Upload/On%20Security.pdf [last access: 2012-08-02].
- Stone Marianne (2009): Security According to Buzan: A Comprehensive Security Analysis. Sciences Po – Paris, France. Groupe d’Etudes et d’Expertise “Sécurité et Technologies” GEEST-2009. New York: Columbia University, School of International and Public Affairs. SECURITY DISCUSSION PAPERS SERIES 1 Spring|09. Retrieved from: http://geest.msh-paris.fr/IMG/pdf/Security_for_Buzan.mp3.pdf [last access: 2012-08-02].
- Balzacq Thierry(2011): Securitization theory: how security problems emerge and dissolve. London: Routledge.
- Benam ÇiĞdem H. (2011): Emergence of a “Big Brother”in Europe: Border Control and Securitization of Migration. Insight Turkey Vol. 13, No. 3: pp. 191-207. Retrieved from: http://harvard.academia.edu/cigdembenam/Papers/776229/Emergence_of_a_Big_Brother_in_Europe_Border_Control_and_Securitization_of_Migration [last access: 2012-08-02].
MAP
<websiteFrame>
website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Insert your pagename here
height=1023
width=100%
border=0
scroll=auto
align=middle
</websiteFrame>
<headertabs/>
