Difference between revisions of "Civic culture"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*reduces inequality and social tension; |
*reduces inequality and social tension; |
||
*incorporates the knowledge, productivity, social and physical capital of the poor in city development; |
*incorporates the knowledge, productivity, social and physical capital of the poor in city development; |
||
| − | *increases local ownership of development processes and programmes.<ref>UN HABITAT 2007. </ref> |
+ | *increases local ownership of development processes and programmes.<ref>United Nations UN Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Inclusive and Sustainable Urban Planning: A Guide for Municipalities. In: UNON Publishing Service Section, 2007, Volume 1, p. 20. </ref> |
This can be realized by several public participation methods and checklists to integrate different security aspects, [[Legal_aspects|legal aspects]] and [[Ethics_aspects|ethics aspects]] into the strategic planning of public spaces: |
This can be realized by several public participation methods and checklists to integrate different security aspects, [[Legal_aspects|legal aspects]] and [[Ethics_aspects|ethics aspects]] into the strategic planning of public spaces: |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| − | The purpose is to develop participatory knowledge and “create contexts in which planners and multicultural groups can continuously learn and experiment, think systematically, engage in meaningful dialogue, and create visions that energize action and inclusion in city planning.”<ref>Ameyaw |
+ | The purpose is to develop participatory knowledge and “create contexts in which planners and multicultural groups can continuously learn and experiment, think systematically, engage in meaningful dialogue, and create visions that energize action and inclusion in city planning.”<ref>S. Ameyaw: Appreciative Planning: An Approach to Planning with Diverse Ethnic and Cultural Groups. In: M. A. Burayidi (ed.): Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society, Westport: Praeger,2000, pp. 101-114, p. 101. </ref> |
Revision as of 13:19, 29 March 2012
Civic culture
Use of civic culture by citizen participation in addressing security aspects related to urban planning
- reduces inequality and social tension;
- incorporates the knowledge, productivity, social and physical capital of the poor in city development;
- increases local ownership of development processes and programmes.[1]
This can be realized by several public participation methods and checklists to integrate different security aspects, legal aspects and ethics aspects into the strategic planning of public spaces:
- Methods to determine risk aspects of the public security culture;
- Methods to determine legal aspects in planning of public spaces;
- Methods to determine ethical aspects in planning of public spaces;
- Dimensions to consider in order to enhance citizens perception of safety in urban crowded places;
The purpose is to develop participatory knowledge and “create contexts in which planners and multicultural groups can continuously learn and experiment, think systematically, engage in meaningful dialogue, and create visions that energize action and inclusion in city planning.”[2]
Footnotes and references
- ↑ United Nations UN Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Inclusive and Sustainable Urban Planning: A Guide for Municipalities. In: UNON Publishing Service Section, 2007, Volume 1, p. 20.
- ↑ S. Ameyaw: Appreciative Planning: An Approach to Planning with Diverse Ethnic and Cultural Groups. In: M. A. Burayidi (ed.): Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society, Westport: Praeger,2000, pp. 101-114, p. 101.
MAP
<websiteFrame>
website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Civic_culture
height=1023
width=100%
border=0
scroll=auto
align=middle
</websiteFrame>
<headertabs/>
