Difference between revisions of "Security issue: Burglary"
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=== Economic impacts === |
=== Economic impacts === |
||
| + | The primary economic impact of breaking and entering exists of: |
||
| − | Types of impact, indication of gravity |
||
| + | * Prevention costs |
||
| + | * Insurance costs |
||
| + | * Costs due to damage |
||
| + | * Costs due to harm |
||
| + | * Costs due to the detection and prevention |
||
| + | * Costs due to persecution |
||
| + | * Costs due to trial |
||
| + | * Costs of enforcement |
||
| + | * Costs due to support |
||
| + | |||
| + | In the Netherlands, property crimes make up about 52.0% of all criminal offences. This includes all kinds of property crimes such as breaking and entry, car looting and bicycle thefts. In 2005 there were almost 70,000 registrated cases of breaking and entry in the Netherlands. This is 0.6% of all criminal offences that year. |
||
| + | |||
| + | Breaking and entring cost Dutch society about EUR 1,400 per offence. A UK-study estimates these costs at EUR 1,900 per case. This is relatively much compared to the average costs of e.g. vandalism (EUR 700 – EUR 950 per case), but far less than sexual offences (EUR 48,000 per case), murder (± EUR 3.2 million) and physical assault and battering (EUR 5,500 – 6,700). |
||
| + | |||
| + | Furthermore, there are the costs aimed to prevent braking and entering. An average Dutch business affiliate, for example is spending annually 891 EUR on security and, of course, the [[Economic effects of crime#secondary impact of crime|secondary economic impact]]. |
||
=== Mobility impacts === |
=== Mobility impacts === |
||
Revision as of 13:36, 27 March 2012
Contents
Security issue: breaking and entering
Breaking and entering is the crime of illicitly entering a building with the intent to committing an offense, particularly (but not limited to) theft.
Description
Attributing circumstances
- …
Socio-economic causes
Although there is no real scientific consensus with respect to the causal relationship between the socio-economic background and property crime like breaking and entering, Australian research for example shows that long term unemployment amongst young male adolescents has a substantial effect on property crime rates[1].
Enthorf and Spengler(2002)[2] find that planning-intense offences like breaking and entering, robbery and violent respond relatively slow to changes in the socio-economic conditions compared to other types of crime like drug and alcohol abuse and violent crime. According to the authors, this may reflect that in a first response to unfortunate social and economic developments some of the affected might become attracted to alcohol and drug abuse, which in a later phase has to financed with criminal activities by committing property crimes like breaking and entering.
Impacts
Social impacts
- Perception of unsafety
- ...
Economic impacts
The primary economic impact of breaking and entering exists of:
- Prevention costs
- Insurance costs
- Costs due to damage
- Costs due to harm
- Costs due to the detection and prevention
- Costs due to persecution
- Costs due to trial
- Costs of enforcement
- Costs due to support
In the Netherlands, property crimes make up about 52.0% of all criminal offences. This includes all kinds of property crimes such as breaking and entry, car looting and bicycle thefts. In 2005 there were almost 70,000 registrated cases of breaking and entry in the Netherlands. This is 0.6% of all criminal offences that year.
Breaking and entring cost Dutch society about EUR 1,400 per offence. A UK-study estimates these costs at EUR 1,900 per case. This is relatively much compared to the average costs of e.g. vandalism (EUR 700 – EUR 950 per case), but far less than sexual offences (EUR 48,000 per case), murder (± EUR 3.2 million) and physical assault and battering (EUR 5,500 – 6,700).
Furthermore, there are the costs aimed to prevent braking and entering. An average Dutch business affiliate, for example is spending annually 891 EUR on security and, of course, the secondary economic impact.
Mobility impacts
Safety impacts
- Loss of shelter by damages (broken windows, etc)
- Loss of privacy
- Wounded, dead
- ...
Measures
Potential measures that can mitigate the likelihood or impact of assault, are:
- Surveillance
- Reaction force
- Social measures (?)
- No secluded areas (mobility)
Footnotes and references
MAP
<websiteFrame> website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Security issue: Breaking and entering height=1023 width=100% border=0 scroll=auto align=middle </websiteFrame>
<headertabs/>
