Difference between revisions of "Objects under consideration"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[File:i.png|25px|right |
+ | [[File:i.png|25px|right|This is a help page for the SecuRbAn risk assessment tool]]The Securban question B - '''objects under consideration''' provides a means to record exactly what boundaries were chosen when making the assessment. For example what buildings are in- or excluded from assessment? What (special) circumstances (like festivals, construction work, vacation periods, etcetera) are included? |
It is only used for later reference by the user. This means the level of detail needed in this field depends on the user's needs to record the exact frame chosen for the assessment, but take in mind that delimitations that are obvious at one time can be less obvious at a later stage. Providing too much detail in this field is certainly safer than providing too little. |
It is only used for later reference by the user. This means the level of detail needed in this field depends on the user's needs to record the exact frame chosen for the assessment, but take in mind that delimitations that are obvious at one time can be less obvious at a later stage. Providing too much detail in this field is certainly safer than providing too little. |
||
Latest revision as of 00:32, 8 January 2016
The Securban question B - objects under consideration provides a means to record exactly what boundaries were chosen when making the assessment. For example what buildings are in- or excluded from assessment? What (special) circumstances (like festivals, construction work, vacation periods, etcetera) are included?
It is only used for later reference by the user. This means the level of detail needed in this field depends on the user's needs to record the exact frame chosen for the assessment, but take in mind that delimitations that are obvious at one time can be less obvious at a later stage. Providing too much detail in this field is certainly safer than providing too little.
