Difference between revisions of "Multiple exits to an area"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "25px|right|This is a help page for the SecuRbAn risk assessment toolAreas with '''multiple possible exits''' are more attractive working grounds for burglars an...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:i.png|25px|right|This is a help page for the SecuRbAn risk assessment tool]]Areas with '''multiple possible exits''' are more attractive working grounds for burglars and vehicle thieves, because they facilitate a quick getaway if needed and the chance of being trapped is slim. |
[[File:i.png|25px|right|This is a help page for the SecuRbAn risk assessment tool]]Areas with '''multiple possible exits''' are more attractive working grounds for burglars and vehicle thieves, because they facilitate a quick getaway if needed and the chance of being trapped is slim. |
||
| − | One can improve the answer by not only looking at the number of exits (two or more being multiple and rating it yes), but also taking into account the layout and nature of the area: |
+ | One can improve the answer by not only looking at the number of exits (two or more being multiple and rating it yes), but also taking into account the layout and nature of the area. For eample: |
* A district with two exits, but with an intricate network of roads to get from one exit to the other is unattractive to thieves and might rate a 'no', even if there are multiple exits. |
* A district with two exits, but with an intricate network of roads to get from one exit to the other is unattractive to thieves and might rate a 'no', even if there are multiple exits. |
||
* A district with one enormous exit that is impossible to block might rate a 'yes'. |
* A district with one enormous exit that is impossible to block might rate a 'yes'. |
||
Revision as of 11:42, 4 September 2013
Areas with multiple possible exits are more attractive working grounds for burglars and vehicle thieves, because they facilitate a quick getaway if needed and the chance of being trapped is slim.
One can improve the answer by not only looking at the number of exits (two or more being multiple and rating it yes), but also taking into account the layout and nature of the area. For eample:
- A district with two exits, but with an intricate network of roads to get from one exit to the other is unattractive to thieves and might rate a 'no', even if there are multiple exits.
- A district with one enormous exit that is impossible to block might rate a 'yes'.
