Difference between revisions of "Civic culture"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Approaches how to address it== |
==Approaches how to address it== |
||
− | * Involve citizens in planning process; |
+ | * [[Citizen participation|Involve citizens]] in planning process; |
− | * Involve different parties and interest groups; |
+ | * [[Advocacy planning|Involve different parties and interest groups]]; |
− | * Encourage locals to express their needs and expectations/requests. |
+ | * [[Citizen jury|Encourage locals]] to express their needs and expectations/requests. |
+ | * [[http://securipedia.eu/mediawiki/index.php/Determination_of_security_aspects_-_methods_for_urban_planners#Methods_to_determine_risk_aspects_of_the_public_security_culture|Include culture aspects]] in assessing criticality of infrastructure and requirements to protect critical infrastructure. |
||
− | |||
− | This can be realized by several public or [[citizen participation|citizen participation]] [[Methods to integrate culture, ethics and legal aspects|methods to integrate different security aspects]], [[culture aspects|culture aspects]], [[Legal_aspects|legal aspects]] and [[Ethics_aspects|ethics aspects]] into the strategic planning of secure public spaces: |
||
− | # Methods to determine [[risk]] aspects of the public [[security culture]]; |
||
− | # Methods to determine legal aspects in planning of public spaces; |
||
− | # Methods to determine ethical aspects in planning of public spaces; |
||
− | # [[Checklists for dimension consideration]] in order to enhance citizens perception of security in urban crowded places. |
||
{{references}} |
{{references}} |
Revision as of 18:38, 4 February 2013
The civic culture concept goes back to Almond and Verba’s study on political culture and the role of participants[1]. They categorized and identified three ideal types of ‘pure’ political culture types (parochial/subject/participant). Civic culture is understood to mix the ideal elements of each. Commonly considered cultural aspects in urban planning relate to providing for coexistence of commerce and civic culture and to ‘building in’ space for the fine arts and public ‘cultural’ plain (e.g. parks as open museums).
The use of civic culture in addressing security related urban planning
- reduces inequality and social tension;
- incorporates the knowledge, productivity, social and physical capital of the poor in city development;
- increases local ownership of development processes and programmes.[2]
Or vice versa: if unaddressed, social inequalities and tension can arise/grow and result in anti-social or criminal behaviour.
Approaches how to address it
- Involve citizens in planning process;
- Involve different parties and interest groups;
- Encourage locals to express their needs and expectations/requests.
- [culture aspects] in assessing criticality of infrastructure and requirements to protect critical infrastructure.
Footnotes and references
- ↑ Almond, G. A./Verba, S. (1963): The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. University of Princeton Press: Princeton, NJ.
- ↑ United Nations UN Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Inclusive and Sustainable Urban Planning: A Guide for Municipalities. In: UNON Publishing Service Section, 2007, Volume 1, p. 20.