Difference between revisions of "Cooperative Discourse"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (20 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Category: |
+ | [[Category:Ethics]] |
[[Category:Legal]] |
[[Category:Legal]] |
||
[[Category:Safety]] |
[[Category:Safety]] |
||
[[Category:Social]] |
[[Category:Social]] |
||
| ⚫ | '''Cooperative Discourse''' is a [[citizen participation]] method to determine and integrate [[legal aspects]] in the strategic planning of secure public spaces. Cooperative discourse is a combination of elements of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediation mediation], foresight studies (e.g., the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphi_method Delphi method]) and [[citizen jury|citizen juries]], aimed at solving planning assignments. The outcome of cooperative discourse is a recommendation to the politicians (decision-makers). |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | =Cooperative Discourse= |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | == Introduction == |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | ''Cooperative Discourse''<ref> ''Participation & sustainable development in Europe'', http://www.partizipation.at/coop-discourse.html</ref> is one of other public participation [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_culturen%20of%20urban%20security] methods to integrate different culture, legal and ethics aspects into consideration of urban security] in the strategic planning of public spaces. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | *The first step of this participatory method is to draw up a catalogue of criteria for assessing various planning options; here, a mediator works with representatives of the interest groups affected. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | + | *In step two, experts analyse the likely effects of the various planning options in a Delphi survey. In the third and final step citizens selected at random evaluate the options in a [[citizen jury|citizen jury]], with the aid of the catalogue of criteria and experts analyses. |
|
| + | ==Links and further reading== |
||
| + | *Participation & Sustainable Development in Europe. Retrieved from: http://www.partizipation.at/coop-discourse.html [last access: 2012-08-20]. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | = MAP = |
||
| − | |||
| − | <websiteFrame> |
||
| − | |||
| − | website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Cooperative_Discourse |
||
| − | |||
| − | height=1023 |
||
| − | |||
| − | width=100% |
||
| − | |||
| − | border=0 |
||
| − | |||
| − | scroll=auto |
||
| − | |||
| − | align=middle |
||
| − | |||
| − | </websiteFrame> |
||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | <headertabs/> |
||
Latest revision as of 13:28, 25 August 2020
Cooperative Discourse is a citizen participation method to determine and integrate legal aspects in the strategic planning of secure public spaces. Cooperative discourse is a combination of elements of mediation, foresight studies (e.g., the Delphi method) and citizen juries, aimed at solving planning assignments. The outcome of cooperative discourse is a recommendation to the politicians (decision-makers).
Support for planning of secure public spaces
- Facilitation of addressing very complex decision processes;
- Handling of regional planning issues with existing latent or open conflicts;
- Determination of legal aspects in planning of public spaces.
Process description
- The first step of this participatory method is to draw up a catalogue of criteria for assessing various planning options; here, a mediator works with representatives of the interest groups affected.
- In step two, experts analyse the likely effects of the various planning options in a Delphi survey. In the third and final step citizens selected at random evaluate the options in a citizen jury, with the aid of the catalogue of criteria and experts analyses.
Links and further reading
- Participation & Sustainable Development in Europe. Retrieved from: http://www.partizipation.at/coop-discourse.html [last access: 2012-08-20].
