Difference between revisions of "Protection against destruction by fanatics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*[[Measure: Target hardening|Target hardening]] by [[Measure: Directing traffic flows|Directing traffic flows]] to separate possible threats from potential targets. |
*[[Measure: Target hardening|Target hardening]] by [[Measure: Directing traffic flows|Directing traffic flows]] to separate possible threats from potential targets. |
||
| − | *[[Measure: Access control| Access control]] / [[Measure: Screening|Screening]] to test a flow of traffic for suspicious signs. |
+ | *[[Measure: Access control| Access control]] / [[Measure: Screening|Screening]] to test a flow of traffic for suspicious signs and control its movement to certain areas. |
The score is divided into three categories in Securban: |
The score is divided into three categories in Securban: |
||
Latest revision as of 17:22, 27 May 2013
The protection level against destruction by fanatics question in Securban concerns the measure types
- Target hardening by Directing traffic flows to separate possible threats from potential targets.
- Access control / Screening to test a flow of traffic for suspicious signs and control its movement to certain areas.
The score is divided into three categories in Securban:
- Neither of the measure types are taken to prevent destruction by fanatics.
- One of the measure types is taken to prevent destruction by fanatics.
- Both of the measure types are taken to prevent destruction by fanatics.
As these categories are not exhaustive, and many intermediate protection levels exist, in answering the question, one will have to choose the level that comes closest to the actual level.
All other measure types against destruction by fanatics (such as surveillance) are covered in other answers in Securban and should not be considered in answering this question.
