Difference between revisions of "Comprehensive approach"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
While a part of the city may be struck by an incident (such as a natural disaster or terrorist attack), other parts may be under warning, evacuation, or even in an immediate post-disaster phase with restoration (e.g. of supply-related infrastructure) beginning. Still other parts of a city may be in the role of observers and drawing immediate lessons for risk assessment, mitigation, prevention and preparedness. An ideal tool would consider this non-linearity. Adding to this non-linearity, an ideal approach to consideration of security aspects in urban planning should also reflect that resilience in cities should be grounded in a holistic view of sustainability. Research has proposed to consider the following five interconnected functional components: social, economic, political, demographic, and environmental.<ref>Pelling 2003: 12.</ref> Several [[state of the art technologies to integrate security information]] are available in order to facilitate comprehensive information of urban planners on security aspects. |
While a part of the city may be struck by an incident (such as a natural disaster or terrorist attack), other parts may be under warning, evacuation, or even in an immediate post-disaster phase with restoration (e.g. of supply-related infrastructure) beginning. Still other parts of a city may be in the role of observers and drawing immediate lessons for risk assessment, mitigation, prevention and preparedness. An ideal tool would consider this non-linearity. Adding to this non-linearity, an ideal approach to consideration of security aspects in urban planning should also reflect that resilience in cities should be grounded in a holistic view of sustainability. Research has proposed to consider the following five interconnected functional components: social, economic, political, demographic, and environmental.<ref>Pelling 2003: 12.</ref> Several [[state of the art technologies to integrate security information]] are available in order to facilitate comprehensive information of urban planners on security aspects. |
||
| − | =References= |
+ | == References == |
<references /> |
<references /> |
||
Revision as of 10:03, 16 March 2012
Comprehensive approach
A comprehensive approach to urban planning also reflects that in urban systems all phases of the common crisis management cycle may be experienced simultaneously in different parts of the city.
While a part of the city may be struck by an incident (such as a natural disaster or terrorist attack), other parts may be under warning, evacuation, or even in an immediate post-disaster phase with restoration (e.g. of supply-related infrastructure) beginning. Still other parts of a city may be in the role of observers and drawing immediate lessons for risk assessment, mitigation, prevention and preparedness. An ideal tool would consider this non-linearity. Adding to this non-linearity, an ideal approach to consideration of security aspects in urban planning should also reflect that resilience in cities should be grounded in a holistic view of sustainability. Research has proposed to consider the following five interconnected functional components: social, economic, political, demographic, and environmental.[1] Several state of the art technologies to integrate security information are available in order to facilitate comprehensive information of urban planners on security aspects.
References
- ↑ Pelling 2003: 12.
MAP
<websiteFrame> website=http://securipedia.tno.nl/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.tno.nl&concept=Comprehensive_approach height=1023 width=100% border=0 scroll=auto align=middle </websiteFrame>
<headertabs/>
