Difference between revisions of "Citizen jury"
m (Text replace - " " to " ") |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
=Citizen jury= |
=Citizen jury= |
||
| − | '''Citizen Jury''' is a [[ |
+ | '''Citizen Jury''' is a [[citizen participation]] method to determine [[ethics aspects]] in planning of (secure) public spaces. All participants are informed in detail about the project in question, and have opportunities to talk with stakeholders, experts, the authorities etc. The participants work through the various aspects of the project in small groups of constantly changing composition. The findings are summarized in a citizens’ assessment, which is passed to the initiators. |
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | In a citizen jury<ref> |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | In a citizen jury<ref>Participation & sustainable development in Europe, http://www.partizipation.at/citizen-jury.html </ref> individuals are selected at random (not as representatives of organizations). They draw up a "citizens’ assessment" of a particular issue, based on their own experience and knowledge. The participants make their recommendations and assessments from the point of view of the common weal. On the jury they do not represent any special interests. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | * Supports considering ethics aspects of all population groups when planning security measures; |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
{{references}} |
{{references}} |
||
Revision as of 11:11, 22 October 2012
Contents
Citizen jury
Citizen Jury is a citizen participation method to determine ethics aspects in planning of (secure) public spaces. All participants are informed in detail about the project in question, and have opportunities to talk with stakeholders, experts, the authorities etc. The participants work through the various aspects of the project in small groups of constantly changing composition. The findings are summarized in a citizens’ assessment, which is passed to the initiators.
Process description
In a citizen jury[1] individuals are selected at random (not as representatives of organizations). They draw up a "citizens’ assessment" of a particular issue, based on their own experience and knowledge. The participants make their recommendations and assessments from the point of view of the common weal. On the jury they do not represent any special interests.
How does it support in planning of secure public spaces?
- Supports considering ethics aspects of all population groups when planning security measures;
- Supports local and regional planning assignments;
- Supports developing overall strategies where it is important that representatives of as many segments of the population as possible should take part on an equal footing;
- Supports Combining stakeholders’ practical knowledge and specialists’ expertise.
Footnotes and references
- ↑ Participation & sustainable development in Europe, http://www.partizipation.at/citizen-jury.html
MAP
<websiteFrame>
website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Citizen_jury
height=1023
width=100%
border=0
scroll=auto
align=middle
</websiteFrame>
<headertabs/>
