Difference between revisions of "Civic culture"
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==Approaches how to address it== |
==Approaches how to address it== |
||
| − | * Involve citizens in planning process |
+ | * Involve citizens in planning process; |
| − | * Involve different parties and interest groups |
+ | * Involve different parties and interest groups; |
| − | * Encourage locals to express their needs and expectations/requests |
+ | * Encourage locals to express their needs and expectations/requests. |
| − | This can be realized by several public participation |
+ | This can be realized by several public or [[citizen participation|public participation]] [[Methods to integrate culture, ethics and legal aspects|methods to integrate different [[security<nowiki>]]</nowiki> aspects]], [[culture aspects|culture aspects]], [[Legal_aspects|legal aspects]] and [[Ethics_aspects|ethics aspects]] into the strategic planning of secure public spaces: |
*Methods to determine [[risk]] aspects of the public [[security culture]]; |
*Methods to determine [[risk]] aspects of the public [[security culture]]; |
||
*Methods to determine legal aspects in planning of public spaces; |
*Methods to determine legal aspects in planning of public spaces; |
||
*Methods to determine ethical aspects in planning of public spaces; |
*Methods to determine ethical aspects in planning of public spaces; |
||
| − | * |
+ | *[[Checklists for dimension consideration]] in order to enhance citizens perception of security in urban crowded places. |
Revision as of 12:54, 11 October 2012
Contents
Civic culture
The civic culture concept goes back to Almond and Verba’s study on political culture and the role of participants[1]. They categorized and identified three ideal types of ‘pure’ political culture types (parochial/subject/participant). Civic culture is understood to mix the ideal elements of each. Commonly considered cultural aspects in urban planning relate to providing for coexistence of commerce and civic culture and to ‘building in’ space for the fine arts and public ‘cultural’ plain (e.g. parks as open museums).
The use of civic culture in addressing security aspects related to urban planning
- reduces inequality and social tension;
- incorporates the knowledge, productivity, social and physical capital of the poor in city development;
- increases local ownership of development processes and programmes.[2]
Or vice versa: if unaddressed, social inequalities and tension can arise/grow and result in anti-social or criminal behaviour.
Approaches how to address it
- Involve citizens in planning process;
- Involve different parties and interest groups;
- Encourage locals to express their needs and expectations/requests.
This can be realized by several public or public participation [[Methods to integrate culture, ethics and legal aspects|methods to integrate different [[security]] aspects]], culture aspects, legal aspects and ethics aspects into the strategic planning of secure public spaces:
- Methods to determine risk aspects of the public security culture;
- Methods to determine legal aspects in planning of public spaces;
- Methods to determine ethical aspects in planning of public spaces;
- Checklists for dimension consideration in order to enhance citizens perception of security in urban crowded places.
Footnotes and references
- ↑ Almond, G. A./Verba, S. (1963): The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. University of Princeton Press: Princeton, NJ.
- ↑ United Nations UN Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Inclusive and Sustainable Urban Planning: A Guide for Municipalities. In: UNON Publishing Service Section, 2007, Volume 1, p. 20.
MAP
<websiteFrame> website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Civic_culture height=1023 width=100% border=0 scroll=auto align=middle </websiteFrame>
<headertabs/>
