Difference between revisions of "Focus group"

From Securipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=Focus group=
 
=Focus group=
   
== Short description ==
+
== Introduction==
In a focus group a specific issue is discussed in a goal-directed way, while group-dynamic processes are encouraged: differing perceptions collide, one has to justify one’s point of view; spontaneous emotional reactions are common.
+
In a focus group<ref>''Participation & sustainable development in Europe'': http://www.partizipation.at/focus-group.html</ref> a specific issue is discussed in a goal-directed way, while group-dynamic processes are encouraged: differing perceptions collide, one has to justify one’s point of view; spontaneous emotional reactions are common.
  +
   
 
== Process ==
 
== Process ==
 
In a focus group 8 to 15 persons take part in a chaired discussion on a predetermined topic; this can lead to a cohesive “group view” developing.
 
In a focus group 8 to 15 persons take part in a chaired discussion on a predetermined topic; this can lead to a cohesive “group view” developing.
  +
   
 
==Help in addressing cultural/ethical aspects in planning of secure public spaces==
 
==Help in addressing cultural/ethical aspects in planning of secure public spaces==
Line 13: Line 15:
 
* obtaining information and ideas with which to handle a particular issue in the process of planning urban spaces.
 
* obtaining information and ideas with which to handle a particular issue in the process of planning urban spaces.
   
==Further information==
 
* ''Participation & sustainable development in Europe'', http://www.partizipation.at/focus-group.html
 
   
 
{{references}}
 
{{references}}

Revision as of 14:06, 9 May 2012

Focus group

Introduction

In a focus group[1] a specific issue is discussed in a goal-directed way, while group-dynamic processes are encouraged: differing perceptions collide, one has to justify one’s point of view; spontaneous emotional reactions are common.


Process

In a focus group 8 to 15 persons take part in a chaired discussion on a predetermined topic; this can lead to a cohesive “group view” developing.


Help in addressing cultural/ethical aspects in planning of secure public spaces

The method is particularly suitable for:

  • identifying motives for a particular type of behavior and revealing areas of difficulty;
  • obtaining information and ideas with which to handle a particular issue in the process of planning urban spaces.


Footnotes and references

  1. Participation & sustainable development in Europe: http://www.partizipation.at/focus-group.html


MAP

<websiteFrame>

website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Focus_group

height=1023

width=100%

border=0

scroll=auto

align=middle

</websiteFrame>


<headertabs/>