Difference between revisions of "Ethics"

From Securipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[File:t.png|25px|right|This page provides information about content and use of the Vitruv tools]][[File:Ethics.jpg|250px|right]]Decisions about how to configure and live within the built environment have '''ethics dimensions''' that are sometimes hard to see. It is nevertheless the duty of planners to ensure that political goals for building development and the provision of public service are implemented without being influenced by pressure by special interests and their superiors. They must be attentive to the public and must explain their actions to their political masters.
= {{PAGENAME}} =
 
Decisions about how to configure and live within the built environment have ethical dimensions that are sometimes hard to see. It is nevertheless the duty of planners to ensure that political goals for building development and the provision of public service are implemented without being influenced by pressure by special interests and their superiors. They must be attentive to the public and must explain their actions to their political masters.
 
   
 
==Description==
 
==Description==
Line 10: Line 9:
 
**[[Ethics_aspects#.22Generic.22_ethics_aspects|Generic ethics aspects]]
 
**[[Ethics_aspects#.22Generic.22_ethics_aspects|Generic ethics aspects]]
 
**[[Ethics_aspects#Ethics_dimensions_of_built_environment|Ethics dimensions of built environment]]
 
**[[Ethics_aspects#Ethics_dimensions_of_built_environment|Ethics dimensions of built environment]]
  +
*[[Determination_of_security_aspects_-_methods_for_urban_planners#Methods_to_determine_ethics_aspects_in_planning_of_public_spaces|Methods to determine ethics aspects in planning of public spaces]]
 
*[[Ethics_aspects#Approaches_to_addressing_ethics_aspects_in_security-related_urban_planning|Approaches to addressing ethics aspects in security-related urban planning]]
 
*[[Ethics_aspects#Approaches_to_addressing_ethics_aspects_in_security-related_urban_planning|Approaches to addressing ethics aspects in security-related urban planning]]
 
*[[Gender perspective]]
 
*[[Gender perspective]]
 
*[[Victimization]]
 
*[[Victimization]]
  +
 
{{references}}
 
{{references}}
 
= MAP =
 
 
<websiteFrame>
 
website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?concept=<replace with pagename>
 
width=100%
 
border=0
 
scroll=auto
 
align=middle
 
</websiteFrame>
 
 
<headertabs/>
 

Latest revision as of 14:51, 21 April 2021

This page provides information about content and use of the Vitruv tools
Ethics.jpg

Decisions about how to configure and live within the built environment have ethics dimensions that are sometimes hard to see. It is nevertheless the duty of planners to ensure that political goals for building development and the provision of public service are implemented without being influenced by pressure by special interests and their superiors. They must be attentive to the public and must explain their actions to their political masters.

Description

The primary obligation of urban planners is to serve the public interests and recognize the comprehensive as well as long-range nature of planning decisions. Planners should as well avoid conflict of interests and not seek or offer other favours and benefits. To respect the professional code of ethics includes also maintaining the public confidence through not using confidential information for financial gain. Protection of personal data (that urban planners could have from participatory activities with citizens, including use of questionnaires, etc.) and of sensitive data is another issue, as is proper consideration of gender aspects. While the public interest is a question of continuous debate, both in its general principles and in its case-by-case applications, it requires a conscientiously held view of the policies and actions that best serve the entire community.

Entry points for ethics aspects in security-related urban planning

Footnotes and references