Difference between revisions of "Cooperative Discourse"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
↑ H.J.M van der Heijde, Magazine for nonsense
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Category:Safety]] |
[[Category:Safety]] |
||
[[Category:Social]] |
[[Category:Social]] |
||
| − | '''Cooperative Discourse''' is a [[citizen participation]] method to determine and integrate [[legal aspects]] in the strategic planning of secure public spaces. Cooperative discourse is a combination of elements of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediation mediation], foresight studies (e.g., the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphi_method Delphi method]) and [[citizen jury|citizen juries]], aimed at solving planning assignments. The outcome of cooperative discourse is a recommendation to the politicians (decision-makers). |
+ | '''Cooperative Discourse''' is a [[citizen participation]] method to determine and integrate [[legal aspects]] in the strategic planning of secure public spaces. Cooperative discourse is a combination of elements of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediation mediation], foresight studies (e.g., the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphi_method Delphi method]) and [[citizen jury|citizen juries]], aimed at solving planning assignments. The outcome of cooperative discourse is a recommendation to the politicians (decision-makers). |
| + | |||
| + | == kopje == |
||
| + | Dit is nieuwe [[Vulnerability|tekst]]. het slaat nergens op, maar het staat er wel<ref>H.J.M van der Heijde, ''Magazine for nonsense''</ref>. |
||
==Support for planning of secure public spaces== |
==Support for planning of secure public spaces== |
||
| + | |||
| − | * |
+ | *Facilitation of addressing very complex decision processes; |
| − | * |
+ | *Handling of regional planning issues with existing latent or open conflicts; |
| − | * |
+ | *Determination of legal aspects in planning of public spaces. |
==Process description== |
==Process description== |
||
| + | |||
| − | *The first step of this participatory method is to draw up a catalogue of criteria for assessing various planning options; here, a mediator works with representatives of the interest groups affected. |
+ | *The first step of this participatory method is to draw up a catalogue of criteria for assessing various planning options; here, a mediator works with representatives of the interest groups affected. |
*In step two, experts analyse the likely effects of the various planning options in a Delphi survey. In the third and final step citizens selected at random evaluate the options in a [[citizen jury|citizen jury]], with the aid of the catalogue of criteria and experts analyses. |
*In step two, experts analyse the likely effects of the various planning options in a Delphi survey. In the third and final step citizens selected at random evaluate the options in a [[citizen jury|citizen jury]], with the aid of the catalogue of criteria and experts analyses. |
||
==Links and further reading== |
==Links and further reading== |
||
| + | |||
*Participation & Sustainable Development in Europe. Retrieved from: http://www.partizipation.at/coop-discourse.html [last access: 2012-08-20]. |
*Participation & Sustainable Development in Europe. Retrieved from: http://www.partizipation.at/coop-discourse.html [last access: 2012-08-20]. |
||
Revision as of 13:27, 25 August 2020
Cooperative Discourse is a citizen participation method to determine and integrate legal aspects in the strategic planning of secure public spaces. Cooperative discourse is a combination of elements of mediation, foresight studies (e.g., the Delphi method) and citizen juries, aimed at solving planning assignments. The outcome of cooperative discourse is a recommendation to the politicians (decision-makers).
Contents
kopje
Dit is nieuwe tekst. het slaat nergens op, maar het staat er wel[1].
Support for planning of secure public spaces
- Facilitation of addressing very complex decision processes;
- Handling of regional planning issues with existing latent or open conflicts;
- Determination of legal aspects in planning of public spaces.
Process description
- The first step of this participatory method is to draw up a catalogue of criteria for assessing various planning options; here, a mediator works with representatives of the interest groups affected.
- In step two, experts analyse the likely effects of the various planning options in a Delphi survey. In the third and final step citizens selected at random evaluate the options in a citizen jury, with the aid of the catalogue of criteria and experts analyses.
Links and further reading
- Participation & Sustainable Development in Europe. Retrieved from: http://www.partizipation.at/coop-discourse.html [last access: 2012-08-20].
