Difference between revisions of "Risk communication"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (19 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Safety]] |
[[Category:Safety]] |
||
[[Category:Social]] |
[[Category:Social]] |
||
| ⚫ | '''Risk communication''' is the interactive process of exchanging information and opinions on risk among risk assessors, risk managers, and other interested parties.<ref>WHO (2012): Food safety. Risk communication. Retrieved from: URL: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/micro/riskcommunication/en/ [2012-10-17].</ref> |
||
| + | ==Description== |
||
| − | = Risk communication = |
||
| ⚫ | '''Risk communication''' is an integral part of risk assessment, risk analyses, and risk response activities. Interested parties include government agencies, corporations and industry groups, unions, media, scientists, professional organizations, public interest groups, and individual citizens when relevant <ref>Renn O. (1991): Risk communication and the social amplification of risk. In: Kasperson R.E. , Stallen P.l .M. (eds.), Communicating the Pu.blic. 287-324. Kluwer Academic Publishers.</ref> Effective risk communication, sensitization and adequate risk management may help to correct negative effects from public risk (mis-)perception and hazard over- or underestimation, which is also essential for the legitimacy of urban planning. Effectiveness of risk management is greatly enhanced when [[Perception of (in)security|societal risk perception]] and views are included in risk communication strategies if the general public is effected <ref>OECD: OECD Reviews of Risk Management Policies. Future Global Shocks. Improving Risk Governance. Preliminary Version. OECD Publishing, 2011. Online: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/24/36/48256382.pdf. </ref>. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | '''Risk communication''' should be an ongoing integral part of risk assessment and anaylses and risk response activities. Interested parties include all stakeholders, govemment agencies, corporations and industry groups, unions, the media, scientists, professional organizations, public interest groups, and individual citizens<ref>Renn O. (1991): Risk communication and the social amplification of risk. In: Kasperson R.E. , Stallen P.l .M. (eds.), Communicating the Pu.blic. 287-324. Kluwer Academic Publishers.</ref> |
||
| + | General considerations: |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | If the general public is concerend or effected by an incident: |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | * Involve public interest groups and representatives of the public from the beginning; in the planning phase as well as in the development phase of projects. |
||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| − | ==Security related aspects and benefits== |
||
| − | * Certain (objective) risks are not perceived. This limits action in mitigation and preparation and capacities in response to both risks and events. |
||
| − | * Risks from urban infrastructure and structures can get misperceived. |
||
| − | * Effective risk communication reduces and compensates gaps between felt and factual risks/security: |
||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | * Involve the public and all stakeholder groups from the beginning of development and planning projects. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
* Use [[citizen participation]] methods to involve citizens in the planning procedure, in particular [[local open dialogue]] methods and [[Planning for Real|planning for real]]. |
* Use [[citizen participation]] methods to involve citizens in the planning procedure, in particular [[local open dialogue]] methods and [[Planning for Real|planning for real]]. |
||
| − | * A foundation for optimizing public risk communication |
+ | * A foundation for optimizing public risk communication in addressing citizens’ felt risks to urban infrastructure and their needs to protect that infrastructure. |
| − | |||
==Related subjects and further information== |
==Related subjects and further information== |
||
* [[Perception of (in)security|Perception of (in)security/risks]] |
* [[Perception of (in)security|Perception of (in)security/risks]] |
||
| − | * [[ |
+ | * [[Risk perception mechanisms|Risk perception mechanisms]] |
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
* For "Risk Communication Guidelines for Public Officials" see URL: http://www.hhs.gov/od/documents/RiskCommunication.pdf [2012-10-17]. |
* For "Risk Communication Guidelines for Public Officials" see URL: http://www.hhs.gov/od/documents/RiskCommunication.pdf [2012-10-17]. |
||
* Principles, foundations, benefits and barriers of risk communication can be found on URL: http://odphp.osophs.dhhs.gov/pubs/prevrpt/archives/95fm1.htm [2012-10-17]. |
* Principles, foundations, benefits and barriers of risk communication can be found on URL: http://odphp.osophs.dhhs.gov/pubs/prevrpt/archives/95fm1.htm [2012-10-17]. |
||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{references}} |
{{references}} |
||
| − | |||
| − | = MAP = |
||
| − | |||
| − | <websiteFrame> |
||
| − | website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?concept=Risk |
||
| − | width=100% |
||
| − | border=0 |
||
| − | scroll=auto |
||
| − | align=middle |
||
| − | </websiteFrame> |
||
| − | |||
| − | <headertabs/> |
||
Latest revision as of 17:16, 15 August 2013
Risk communication is the interactive process of exchanging information and opinions on risk among risk assessors, risk managers, and other interested parties.[1]
Contents
Description
Risk communication is an integral part of risk assessment, risk analyses, and risk response activities. Interested parties include government agencies, corporations and industry groups, unions, media, scientists, professional organizations, public interest groups, and individual citizens when relevant [2] Effective risk communication, sensitization and adequate risk management may help to correct negative effects from public risk (mis-)perception and hazard over- or underestimation, which is also essential for the legitimacy of urban planning. Effectiveness of risk management is greatly enhanced when societal risk perception and views are included in risk communication strategies if the general public is effected [3].
Approaches how to address it
General considerations:
- To be effective, risk communication should be planned and implemented systematically, based on an overall risk communication strategy. Decisions on risk communication include "What?", "Whom?" and "How?".
- Cooperate with stakeholders (e.g. government agencies, corporations, organizations, public media etc.) to elaborate comprehensive risk communication strategies.
- Consider risk communication as an integral part of project planning and the whole planning and development procedure.
If the general public is concerend or effected by an incident:
- Involve public interest groups and representatives of the public from the beginning; in the planning phase as well as in the development phase of projects.
- Inform public interest groups, representatives of the public, and citizens on risks of planned objects before construction.
- Use citizen participation methods to involve citizens in the planning procedure, in particular local open dialogue methods and planning for real.
- A foundation for optimizing public risk communication in addressing citizens’ felt risks to urban infrastructure and their needs to protect that infrastructure.
Related subjects and further information
- Perception of (in)security/risks
- Risk perception mechanisms
- The Centre For Risk Communication provides services and information on critical issues management and risk communication: URL: http://centerforriskcommunication.org/ [2012-10-17].
- For "Risk Communication Guidelines for Public Officials" see URL: http://www.hhs.gov/od/documents/RiskCommunication.pdf [2012-10-17].
- Principles, foundations, benefits and barriers of risk communication can be found on URL: http://odphp.osophs.dhhs.gov/pubs/prevrpt/archives/95fm1.htm [2012-10-17].
Footnotes and references
- ↑ WHO (2012): Food safety. Risk communication. Retrieved from: URL: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/micro/riskcommunication/en/ [2012-10-17].
- ↑ Renn O. (1991): Risk communication and the social amplification of risk. In: Kasperson R.E. , Stallen P.l .M. (eds.), Communicating the Pu.blic. 287-324. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- ↑ OECD: OECD Reviews of Risk Management Policies. Future Global Shocks. Improving Risk Governance. Preliminary Version. OECD Publishing, 2011. Online: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/24/36/48256382.pdf.
