Difference between revisions of "Local open dialogue"
| (27 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | A '''Local Open Dialogue''' is a specific [[citizen participation]] method in urban planning. It helps to integrate different [[Culture_aspects|culture]], [[Legal_aspects|legal]] and [[Ethics_aspects|ethics aspects]] into consideration of urban [[security]] in the strategic planning of public spaces.<ref>Risk Management at the Frankfurt/Main Airport. Report commissioned by the Regional Dialogue Forum on the Frankfurt Airport. Retrieved from: http://www.forum-flughafen-region.de/fileadmin/files/Archiv/Archiv_RDF_Gutachten/Risikomanagement_Gutachten.pdf</ref>. |
||
| − | == Introduction == |
||
| − | Public participation methods are helpful to integrate different culture, legal and ethics aspects into consideration of urban security in the strategic planning of public spaces. |
||
| − | Methods of ''local open dialogue''<ref>Risk management at the Frankfurt/Main Airport. Report commissioned by the Regional Dialogue Forum on the Frankfurt Airport, http://www.forum-flughafen-region.de/fileadmin/files/Archiv/Archiv_RDF_Gutachten/Risikomanagement_Gutachten.pdf</ref> are in particular supportive to [[Aspect_determination_methods_for_urban_planners|determine risk aspects]] and comprise the following: |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | ''Local Open Dialogues'' can in particular support [[Determination of security aspects - methods for urban planners|risk assessment]] that considers societal security aspects in planning of public spaces. In particular, the method is able to: |
||
| + | * Support citizen-centred [[risk communication]] in order to foster public acceptance of urban planning decisions related to security issues; |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | * Support identification of relevant public views and citizens' [[perception of (in)security and risks]]; |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | * Support assessment of public acceptance of planned measures and security installations; |
||
| ⚫ | The so-called citizens' exhibition is a method that uses linguistic and visual mediators (photos and interview excerpts) to create a discussion platform for the citizens affected by the urban planning process. The duration of the method is approximately 1 year. The method is used in medium to long term urban development and spatial planning processes. |
||
| + | * Contribute to comprehensive risk/security assessment. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | ===Help in addressing cultural/ethical aspects in planning of secure public spaces=== |
||
| + | ''Local Open Dialogue'' processes can comprise a variety of elements, such as the following: |
||
| − | * Risk communication, perception and assessment |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | The so-called citizens' exhibition is a method that uses linguistic and visual mediators (photos and interview excerpts) to create a discussion platform for the citizens affected by the urban planning process. The duration of the method is approximately 1 year. The method is used in medium to long term urban development and spatial planning processes. |
||
| − | ==Experts forum== |
+ | ===Experts' forum=== |
| ⚫ | |||
| − | ===Process=== |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | * Risk communication, perception and assessment |
||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | ===Process=== |
||
Stakeholders from citizens and experts community are asked for opinion/assessment. |
Stakeholders from citizens and experts community are asked for opinion/assessment. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | ===Help in addressing cultural/ethical aspects in planning of secure public spaces=== |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | * Risk communication, perception and assessment |
||
| − | == |
+ | ===Round table=== |
| ⚫ | A round tables, representatives of organised or non-organised groups affected by the same problem and with different interests come together to discuss their concerns. This method is applied to find common solutions to problems in the field of urban development, urban renewal, sustainable development, etc. |
||
| − | ===Process=== |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | ===Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces=== |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | * Risk communication, perception and assessment |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==Round table== |
||
| − | ===Process=== |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| − | ===Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces=== |
||
| − | * Risk communication, perception and assessment |
||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | ===Process=== |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| − | ===Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces=== |
||
| − | * Risk communication, perception and assessment |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==Further information== |
||
| ⚫ | |||
{{references}} |
{{references}} |
||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | = MAP = |
||
| − | |||
| − | <websiteFrame> |
||
| − | |||
| − | website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Local_open_dialogue |
||
| − | |||
| − | height=1023 |
||
| − | |||
| − | width=100% |
||
| − | |||
| − | border=0 |
||
| − | |||
| − | scroll=auto |
||
| − | |||
| − | align=middle |
||
| − | |||
| − | </websiteFrame> |
||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | <headertabs/> |
||
Latest revision as of 09:31, 18 June 2013
A Local Open Dialogue is a specific citizen participation method in urban planning. It helps to integrate different culture, legal and ethics aspects into consideration of urban security in the strategic planning of public spaces.[1].
Contents
Support for planning of secure public spaces
Local Open Dialogues can in particular support risk assessment that considers societal security aspects in planning of public spaces. In particular, the method is able to:
- Support citizen-centred risk communication in order to foster public acceptance of urban planning decisions related to security issues;
- Support identification of relevant public views and citizens' perception of (in)security and risks;
- Support assessment of public acceptance of planned measures and security installations;
- Contribute to comprehensive risk/security assessment.
Process description
Local Open Dialogue processes can comprise a variety of elements, such as the following:
Citizens' exhibition
The so-called citizens' exhibition is a method that uses linguistic and visual mediators (photos and interview excerpts) to create a discussion platform for the citizens affected by the urban planning process. The duration of the method is approximately 1 year. The method is used in medium to long term urban development and spatial planning processes.
Experts' forum
Experts forums or working groups involve representatives of different urban planning teams (management, consulting, architects etc.). The aim of this method is to develop typical project outlines.
Interviews/surveys
Stakeholders from citizens and experts community are asked for opinion/assessment.
Local dialogue
A Local Dialogue is a citizens' assembly with the aim to discuss issues of regional (security) development. By brainstorming, thematic priorities are defined, and appropriate working groups are formed to discuss them.
Round table
A round tables, representatives of organised or non-organised groups affected by the same problem and with different interests come together to discuss their concerns. This method is applied to find common solutions to problems in the field of urban development, urban renewal, sustainable development, etc.
Future workshops
Future workshops are dialogic, creativity activating, open-ended, democratic processes for developing and testing new ideas, projects and solutions. The aim is to develop new projects and solutions.
Footnotes and references
- ↑ Risk Management at the Frankfurt/Main Airport. Report commissioned by the Regional Dialogue Forum on the Frankfurt Airport. Retrieved from: http://www.forum-flughafen-region.de/fileadmin/files/Archiv/Archiv_RDF_Gutachten/Risikomanagement_Gutachten.pdf
