Difference between revisions of "Social aspects"

From Securipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 46: Line 46:
 
====Entry points for culture aspects in security-related urban planning====
 
====Entry points for culture aspects in security-related urban planning====
 
*[[Culture aspects|Overview of culture aspects]]
 
*[[Culture aspects|Overview of culture aspects]]
*[[Security culture]]
+
*Security culture
  +
**[[Security culture]]
  +
**[[Determination_of_security_aspects_-_methods_for_urban_planners#Methods_to_determine_risk_aspects_of_the_public_security_culture|Methods to determine risk aspects of the public security culture]]
 
*[[Civic culture]]
 
*[[Civic culture]]
 
*[[Community safety approach]]
 
*[[Community safety approach]]

Revision as of 23:08, 19 December 2012

Social aspects

While security aspects have only since recently figured more prominently in urban planning, much of that planning has rather direct effects on citizens’ security. Highlighting 'soft' aspects (such as society and culture) will help urban planners identify how their planning decisions may directly or indirectly affect societal security. One main reason for this is that security aspects obviously have an influence on how built environment is changed and developed; conversely, the way in which built environment is changed and developed influences the security of infrastructures, and of society as a whole, both in manifest and in latent ways.

Identification of foundations and practical methods to integrate social and culture aspects in the VITRUV urban planning tool will facilitate the consideration of multiple threats and vulnerabilities in the context of urban planning. This will help to implement a resilience-enhancing comprehensive approach to urban security.

Description

Social aspects

Urban structure has an impact on social processes, and this needs to be addressed in strategic urban planning aslo as far as security considerations are concerned. Design features of urban infrastructure influence citizens’ perception of the risk that infrastructure is at, or that it is assumed to mitigate or prevent. Design features also influence the general perception of criticality of that infrastructure.

Secure environments also facilitate the meeting of social needs by help of built infrastructure. Commonly, societal needs are addressed in is goal for::urban planning (such as need for recreation area, need for public transport improvement, need for bike routes, need for social gathering places and culture resources, special needs of vulnerable groups (such as children, disabled, elderly etc.). Many of them have security/safety relevance. Examples include:

  1. Lighting of or video installation at urban spaces, bus stops, etc., which helps reducing crime rates, robberies, sexual harassment etc.
  2. According standardized constructions to avoid chemical leaching from/around industrial sites and to avoid substance harassment and environmental pollution;
  3. According physical protection of urban rivers and channels (also sewage) to avoid flooding /overflowing;
  4. Child friendly construction norms and standards for schools and preschools to avoid injuries (e.g. safety areas near streets);
  5. Additional parking houses/garages to provide for increased drivers’ needs – improvement of ventilation systems to control exhaust fumes and avoid health problems;
  6. Counter-terrorism design measures to avoid terrorist attempts;
  7. etc.

Practical addressing of social aspects and aspects of security culture in security-related urban planning can best be accomplished by appropriately involving citizens, based on a set of introduced methods of citizen participation.

Entry points for social aspects in security-related urban planning

Culture aspects

Design features of urban infrastructure influence citizens’ perception of the risk that infrastructure is at, or that it is assumed to mitigate or prevent. Design features also influence the general perception of criticality of that infrastructure. These two are important aspects of security culture. While urban sociology and socially concerned urban planning have gained much insight on environments such as "pleasant", "calming" or "exciting"[1], "secure environments" have been addressed to a far lesser extent. But there are several further reasons why it is important to consider culture aspects in urban planning:

  • First, culture determines the behaviour and perception of people and thus determines the (perceived) security.
  • Second, cultural behaviour can be directed by the surroundings, and thus by the result of urban planning.
  • Third, the framework for urban planning is also to some extent culturally determined: Different perceptions and disputes about risk and security can be linked to competing worldviews, as they are paramount in multicultural cities: Conceptions of risk, security and solutions to security problems vary according to the organisation of political and social relations.

Entry points for culture aspects in security-related urban planning

Footnotes and references

  1. Cf. Nasar, J. L.: Environmental Psychology and Urban Design. In: Banerjee, T./Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (eds.): Companion to Urban Design. London/New York: Routledge, 2001, 162-174 (168).

MAP

<websiteFrame> website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?concept=<replace with pagename> width=100% border=0 scroll=auto align=middle </websiteFrame>

<headertabs/>