Difference between revisions of "New urbanism"

From Securipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
   
 
= New urbanism =
 
= New urbanism =
'''New urbanism'''<ref>E.g. P. Calthorpe/W. Fulton: The Regional City: Planning for the End of the Sprawl. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2001.</ref>
+
'''New urbanism'''<ref>E.g. P. Calthorpe/W. Fulton: The Regional City: Planning for the End of the Sprawl. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2001.</ref> is the main frame of reference for addressing social and culture aspects in urban planning. It is the conceptual integration of society into urbanity and links approaches from urban planning as well as social sciences and humanities.
* is the main frame of reference for addressing social and culture aspects in urban planning
 
* is the conceptual integration of society into urbanity
 
* links approaches from urban planning as well as social sciences and humanities.
 
   
[[Security]] aspects obviously have an influence on how built environment is changed and developed. Conversely, the way in which built environment is changed and developed influences the security of infrastructures, and of society as a whole. New urbanism
+
[[Security]] aspects obviously have an influence on how built environment is changed and developed. Conversely, the way in which built environment is changed and developed influences the security of infrastructures, and of society as a whole. New Urbanism sets out to overcome the zoning of certain functional areas (typical of the industrial age) that separate residential from economy and other use. Nowadays, planning should aim at a mix of residential and economy-related functions and eliminate regional sprawl, because
 
 
New Urbanism sets out to overcome the zoning of certain functional areas (typical of the industrial age) that separate residential from economy and other use. Nowadays, planning should aim at a mix of residential and economy-related functions and eliminate regional sprawl, because
 
   
 
# urban structure has an impact on social processes;
 
# urban structure has an impact on social processes;
# urban space and society interact, and “social space operates as both a product and a producer of changes in the metropolitan environment” ([[sociospatial perspective]]).
+
# urban space and society interact, and “social space operates as both a product and a producer of changes in the metropolitan environment”<ref>Gottdiener, M./Hutchison, R. (2011): The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview, p. 394.</ref> ([[sociospatial perspective]]).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
== Related aspects ==
 
Important trains of thought of practical relevance for the consideration of “soft” security in urban planning include the following:
 
*[[Sociospatial perspective]];
 
*[[Ecological perspective]];
 
*[[Environmental psychology]];
 
* [[Resilience]], societal resilience;
 
*Risk research on perception of the [[Infrastructure|criticality of infrastructure]].
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
== Criticism ==
 
== Criticism ==
Line 40: Line 14:
   
 
* respect the foundations for the perception of insecurity and fear by the citizens.
 
* respect the foundations for the perception of insecurity and fear by the citizens.
*It follows some sort of physical determinism: Social behaviour cannot be directed by physical design: “Residents of communities do not behave in certain ways simply because well-known architects direct them to do so.”<ref>Gottdiener, M./Hutchison, R. (2011): The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview. p. 331.</ref>
+
* It follows some sort of physical determinism: Social behaviour cannot be directed by physical design: “Residents of communities do not behave in certain ways simply because well-known architects direct them to do so.”<ref>Gottdiener, M./Hutchison, R. (2011): The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview. p. 331.</ref>
   
 
==Security related aspects and benefits==
 
==Security related aspects and benefits==

Revision as of 13:29, 11 October 2012


New urbanism

New urbanism[1] is the main frame of reference for addressing social and culture aspects in urban planning. It is the conceptual integration of society into urbanity and links approaches from urban planning as well as social sciences and humanities.

Security aspects obviously have an influence on how built environment is changed and developed. Conversely, the way in which built environment is changed and developed influences the security of infrastructures, and of society as a whole. New Urbanism sets out to overcome the zoning of certain functional areas (typical of the industrial age) that separate residential from economy and other use. Nowadays, planning should aim at a mix of residential and economy-related functions and eliminate regional sprawl, because

  1. urban structure has an impact on social processes;
  2. urban space and society interact, and “social space operates as both a product and a producer of changes in the metropolitan environment”[2] (sociospatial perspective).

Criticism

However, this conceptual integration of society into urbanity does not always well reflect the new levels of social density that will be reached and that may change urban cultures. New urbanism does not

  • respect the foundations for the perception of insecurity and fear by the citizens.
  • It follows some sort of physical determinism: Social behaviour cannot be directed by physical design: “Residents of communities do not behave in certain ways simply because well-known architects direct them to do so.”[3]

Security related aspects and benefits

  • Design can impact (anti-social/criminal) behaviour in a positive or negative way;
  • Design can impact social behaviour and reactions to threats and risks;
  • Social behaviour cannot be solely directed by design – it depends on socio-cultural roots, security/risk culture, perceptions etc.

Approaches how to address it

  • Consider social needs;
  • Consider interactions of society with urban space;
  • Involve citizens in planning projects (citizen participation);
  • Integrate society into urban planning and into urbanity;
  • Integrate approaches and findings from social sciences and humanities.


Related aspects


Footnotes and references

  1. E.g. P. Calthorpe/W. Fulton: The Regional City: Planning for the End of the Sprawl. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2001.
  2. Gottdiener, M./Hutchison, R. (2011): The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview, p. 394.
  3. Gottdiener, M./Hutchison, R. (2011): The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview. p. 331.

MAP

<websiteFrame> website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=New_urbanism height=1023 width=100% border=0 scroll=auto align=middle </websiteFrame>

<headertabs/>