Difference between revisions of "Local open dialogue"

From Securipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - " " to " ")
Line 3: Line 3:
 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_participation Public participation] methods are helpful to integrate different [[Culture_aspects|culture]], [[Legal_aspects|legal]] and [[Ethics_aspects|ethics aspects]] into consideration of urban security in the strategic planning of public spaces.
 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_participation Public participation] methods are helpful to integrate different [[Culture_aspects|culture]], [[Legal_aspects|legal]] and [[Ethics_aspects|ethics aspects]] into consideration of urban security in the strategic planning of public spaces.
 
Methods of '''local open dialogue'''<ref>Risk management at the Frankfurt/Main Airport. Report commissioned by the Regional Dialogue Forum on the Frankfurt Airport, http://www.forum-flughafen-region.de/fileadmin/files/Archiv/Archiv_RDF_Gutachten/Risikomanagement_Gutachten.pdf</ref> are in particular supportive to [[Aspect_determination_methods_for_urban_planners|determine risk aspects]] and comprise the following:
 
Methods of '''local open dialogue'''<ref>Risk management at the Frankfurt/Main Airport. Report commissioned by the Regional Dialogue Forum on the Frankfurt Airport, http://www.forum-flughafen-region.de/fileadmin/files/Archiv/Archiv_RDF_Gutachten/Risikomanagement_Gutachten.pdf</ref> are in particular supportive to [[Aspect_determination_methods_for_urban_planners|determine risk aspects]] and comprise the following:
 
   
 
==Citizens' exhibition==
 
==Citizens' exhibition==
Line 11: Line 10:
 
===Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces===
 
===Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces===
 
* Risk communication, perception and assessment
 
* Risk communication, perception and assessment
 
   
 
==Experts forum==
 
==Experts forum==
Line 19: Line 17:
 
===Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces===
 
===Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces===
 
* Risk communication, perception and assessment
 
* Risk communication, perception and assessment
 
   
 
==Interviews/surveys==
 
==Interviews/surveys==
Line 27: Line 24:
 
===Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces===
 
===Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces===
 
* Risk communication, perception and assessment
 
* Risk communication, perception and assessment
 
   
 
==Local dialogue==
 
==Local dialogue==
Line 35: Line 31:
 
===Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces===
 
===Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces===
 
* Risk communication, perception and assessment
 
* Risk communication, perception and assessment
 
   
 
==Round table==
 
==Round table==
Line 43: Line 38:
 
===Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces===
 
===Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces===
 
* Risk communication, perception and assessment
 
* Risk communication, perception and assessment
 
   
 
==Future workshops==
 
==Future workshops==
Line 51: Line 45:
 
===Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces===
 
===Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces===
 
* Risk communication, perception and assessment
 
* Risk communication, perception and assessment
 
   
 
{{references}}
 
{{references}}
 
   
 
= MAP =
 
= MAP =
Line 73: Line 65:
   
 
</websiteFrame>
 
</websiteFrame>
 
   
   

Revision as of 12:40, 15 October 2012

Local open dialogue

Public participation methods are helpful to integrate different culture, legal and ethics aspects into consideration of urban security in the strategic planning of public spaces. Methods of local open dialogue[1] are in particular supportive to determine risk aspects and comprise the following:

Citizens' exhibition

Process

The so-called citizens' exhibition is a method that uses linguistic and visual mediators (photos and interview excerpts) to create a discussion platform for the citizens affected by the urban planning process. The duration of the method is approximately 1 year. The method is used in medium to long term urban development and spatial planning processes.

Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces

  • Risk communication, perception and assessment

Experts forum

Process

Experts forums or working groups involve representatives of different urban planning teams (management, consulting, architects etc.). The aim of this method is to develop typical project outlines.

Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces

  • Risk communication, perception and assessment

Interviews/surveys

Process

Stakeholders from citizens and experts community are asked for opinion/assessment.

Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces

  • Risk communication, perception and assessment

Local dialogue

Process

Citizens' assembly with the aim to discuss issues of regional development. By brainstorming, thematic priorities are defined and appropriate working groups formed to discuss them.

Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces

  • Risk communication, perception and assessment

Round table

Process

Round tables are distinguished through the fact that representatives of organized or non-organized groups affected by the same problem and with different interests get together and discuss their concerns. This method is applied to solve problems in the field of urban development, urban renewal, sustainable development etc.

Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces

  • Risk communication, perception and assessment

Future workshops

Process

Future workshops are dialogic, creativity activating, open-ended, democratic processes for developing and testing new ideas, projects and solutions. The aim is to develop new projects and solutions.

Help in addressing cultural/ethics aspects in planning of secure public spaces

  • Risk communication, perception and assessment

Footnotes and references

  1. Risk management at the Frankfurt/Main Airport. Report commissioned by the Regional Dialogue Forum on the Frankfurt Airport, http://www.forum-flughafen-region.de/fileadmin/files/Archiv/Archiv_RDF_Gutachten/Risikomanagement_Gutachten.pdf

MAP

<websiteFrame>

website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Local_open_dialogue

height=1023

width=100%

border=0

scroll=auto

align=middle

</websiteFrame>


<headertabs/>