Difference between revisions of "Cooperative Discourse"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Process description== |
==Process description== |
||
*The first step of this participatory method is to draw up a catalogue of criteria for assessing various planning options; here, a mediator works with representatives of the interest groups affected. |
*The first step of this participatory method is to draw up a catalogue of criteria for assessing various planning options; here, a mediator works with representatives of the interest groups affected. |
||
| − | *In step two, experts analyse the likely effects of the various planning options in a Delphi survey. In the third and final step citizens selected at random evaluate the options in a [[ |
+ | *In step two, experts analyse the likely effects of the various planning options in a Delphi survey. In the third and final step citizens selected at random evaluate the options in a [[citizen jury|citizen jury]], with the aid of the catalogue of criteria and experts analyses. |
==Links and further reading== |
==Links and further reading== |
||
Revision as of 18:11, 15 August 2013
Cooperative Discourse is a citizen participation method to determine and integrate legal aspects in the strategic planning of secure public spaces. Cooperative discourse is a combination of elements of mediation, foresight studies (e.g., the Delphi method) and citizen juries, aimed at solving planning assignments. The outcome of cooperative discourse is a recommendation to the politicians (decision-makers).
Support for planning of secure public spaces
- Facilitation of addressing very complex decision processes;
- Handling of regional planning issues with existing latent or open conflicts;
- Determination of legal aspects in planning of public spaces.
Process description
- The first step of this participatory method is to draw up a catalogue of criteria for assessing various planning options; here, a mediator works with representatives of the interest groups affected.
- In step two, experts analyse the likely effects of the various planning options in a Delphi survey. In the third and final step citizens selected at random evaluate the options in a citizen jury, with the aid of the catalogue of criteria and experts analyses.
Links and further reading
- Participation & Sustainable Development in Europe. Retrieved from: http://www.partizipation.at/coop-discourse.html [last access: 2012-08-20].
