Sociospatial perspective - Revision history

Florian at 14:45, 11 June 2013

2013-06-11T14:45:53Z

Florian at 10:28, 11 June 2013

2013-06-11T10:28:58Z

Alexander: /* Security aspects */

2013-06-10T16:37:44Z

Security aspects

Alexander: /* Security aspects */

2013-06-10T16:37:08Z

Security aspects

Alexander at 15:41, 10 June 2013

2013-06-10T15:41:58Z

Florian at 10:10, 5 February 2013

2013-02-05T10:10:51Z

Albert at 16:58, 30 January 2013

2013-01-30T16:58:00Z

Albert: Text replace - "= MAP =" to ""

2013-01-30T16:31:57Z

Text replace - "= MAP =" to ""

Albert: Text replace - " ={{PAGENAME}}=" to ""

2013-01-30T15:08:54Z

Text replace - " ={{PAGENAME}}=" to ""

Florian at 22:09, 19 December 2012

2012-12-19T22:09:36Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Category:Social]]
 [[File:ae.png|25px|right|This is a page providing background in a specific field of expertise]]
-The '''socio-spatial perspective''' in urbanism research addresses how ''built infrastructure'' and ''society'' interact. It assumes that social space operates as both a product and a producer of changes in the metropolitan environment.<ref>M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 394; see also p. 20.</ref>
+The '''socio-spatial perspective''' in urbanism research addresses how ''built infrastructure'' and ''society'' interact. It assumes that social space operates as both a product and a producer of changes in the metropolitan environment.<ref>Gottdiener M., Hutchison R.: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview/Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, 394; see also 20.</ref>
 In the socio-spatial perspective, built environment is intrinsically meaningful: It has its particular “semiotics” that tell about policy, culture, society, economy, etc., and about security as well.
 ==Interaction of urban structures and society==
-On the bottom line, urban structure has an impact on social processes, and this needs to be addressed in strategic [[urban planning]].<ref>Hannigan, J. (1998): Fantasy City: Pleasure and Profit in the Post-modern Metropolis. Routledge: London. </ref> The school of “[[New urbanism|New Urbanism]]” has referred to this as the “socio-spatial perspective”. This means that urban space and society interact.
+On the bottom line, urban structure has an impact on social processes, and this needs to be addressed in strategic [[urban planning]].<ref>Hannigan J.: Fantasy City: Pleasure and Profit in the Post-modern Metropolis. London: Routledge, 1998. </ref> The school of “[[New urbanism|New Urbanism]]” has referred to this as the “socio-spatial perspective”. This means that urban space and society interact.
 ==Security aspects==
 * Design features of urban [http://www.focusproject.eu/web/focus/wiki/-/wiki/ESG/Infrastructure infrastructure] influence citizens’ [[Perception of (in)security|perception]] of the [[risk]], that this infrastructure is at, as well as the general [[Critical_infrastructure#Criticality_of_infastructure|perception of criticality]] of that infrastructure.
-* Critics: Urbanisation studies strongly argue that differences between actual and perceived security are not influenced by the design of built environment, but that they mainly are mass media constructs. The perception of (in)security in cities rather depends [...] ''upon the substantial amount and constant flow of information that urban residents receive from many sources''.<ref>United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Enhancing urban safety and security. London: Earthscan, 2007, p. 19. Online: http://books.google.at/books?id=SmsbwAtSfE0C&pg=PA205&dq=legal+aspects+in+urban+planning+security&hl=de&ei=m-WzTu-tLMbQ4QST4vjQAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=legal%20aspects%20in%20urban%20planning%20security&f=false </ref>
+* Critics: Urbanisation studies strongly argue that differences between actual and perceived security are not influenced by the design of built environment, but that they mainly are mass media constructs. The perception of (in)security in cities rather depends [...] ''upon the substantial amount and constant flow of information that urban residents receive from many sources''.<ref>United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Enhancing urban safety and security. London: Earthscan, 2007, 19. Retrieved from: http://books.google.at/books?id=SmsbwAtSfE0C&pg=PA205&dq=legal+aspects+in+urban+planning+security&hl=de&ei=m-WzTu-tLMbQ4QST4vjQAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=legal%20aspects%20in%20urban%20planning%20security&f=false. </ref>
-* Many examples of community-enhancing constructions represent an “''elitism of architectural choice''”<ref>M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 331.</ref> that may in the end increase societal gaps and perceptions of fear, as well as actual insecurity.
+* Many examples of community-enhancing constructions represent an “''elitism of architectural choice''”<ref>Gottdiener M./Hutchison R: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview/Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, 331.</ref> that may in the end increase societal gaps and perceptions of fear, as well as actual insecurity.
 ==Approaches how to address sociospatial security aspects==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Category:Social]]
 [[File:ae.png|25px|right|This is a page providing background in a specific field of expertise]]
-The '''socio-spatial perspective''' in urbanism research addresses how ''built infrastructure'' and ''society'' interact. It assumes that "social space operates as both a product and a producer of changes in the metropolitan environment"<ref>M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 394; see also p. 20.</ref>.
+The '''socio-spatial perspective''' in urbanism research addresses how ''built infrastructure'' and ''society'' interact. It assumes that social space operates as both a product and a producer of changes in the metropolitan environment.<ref>M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 394; see also p. 20.</ref>
-In the socio-spatial perspective, built environment is intrinsically meaningful, it has its particular “semiotics” that tell about policy, culture, society, economy, etc., and also about security.
+In the socio-spatial perspective, built environment is intrinsically meaningful: It has its particular “semiotics” that tell about policy, culture, society, economy, etc., and about security as well.
 ==Interaction of urban structures and society==
-On the bottom line, urban structure has an impact on social processes, and this needs to be addressed in strategic [[urban planning]]<ref>Hannigan, J. (1998): Fantasy City: Pleasure and Profit in the Post-modern Metropolis. Routledge: London. </ref>. The school of “[[New urbanism|New Urbanism]]” has referred to this as the “ socio-spatial perspective”. This means that urban space and society interact.
+On the bottom line, urban structure has an impact on social processes, and this needs to be addressed in strategic [[urban planning]].<ref>Hannigan, J. (1998): Fantasy City: Pleasure and Profit in the Post-modern Metropolis. Routledge: London. </ref> The school of “[[New urbanism|New Urbanism]]” has referred to this as the “socio-spatial perspective”. This means that urban space and society interact.
 ==Security aspects==
 * Design features of urban [http://www.focusproject.eu/web/focus/wiki/-/wiki/ESG/Infrastructure infrastructure] influence citizens’ [[Perception of (in)security|perception]] of the [[risk]], that this infrastructure is at, as well as the general [[Critical_infrastructure#Criticality_of_infastructure|perception of criticality]] of that infrastructure.
-* Critics: Urbanization studies strongly argue that differences between actual and perceived security are not influenced by the design of built environment but that they mainly are mass media constructs. The perception of (in)security in cities rather depends "[...] ''upon the substantial amount and constant flow of information that urban residents receive from many sources''”<ref>United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Enhancing urban safety and security. London: Earthscan, 2007, p. 19. Online: http://books.google.at/books?id=SmsbwAtSfE0C&pg=PA205&dq=legal+aspects+in+urban+planning+security&hl=de&ei=m-WzTu-tLMbQ4QST4vjQAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=legal%20aspects%20in%20urban%20planning%20security&f=false </ref>.
+* Critics: Urbanisation studies strongly argue that differences between actual and perceived security are not influenced by the design of built environment, but that they mainly are mass media constructs. The perception of (in)security in cities rather depends [...] ''upon the substantial amount and constant flow of information that urban residents receive from many sources''.<ref>United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Enhancing urban safety and security. London: Earthscan, 2007, p. 19. Online: http://books.google.at/books?id=SmsbwAtSfE0C&pg=PA205&dq=legal+aspects+in+urban+planning+security&hl=de&ei=m-WzTu-tLMbQ4QST4vjQAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=legal%20aspects%20in%20urban%20planning%20security&f=false </ref>
 * Many examples of community-enhancing constructions represent an “''elitism of architectural choice''”<ref>M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 331.</ref> that may in the end increase societal gaps and perceptions of fear, as well as actual insecurity.

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 ==Security aspects==
-* Design features of urban [http://www.focusproject.eu/web/focus/wiki/-/wiki/ESG/Infrastructure|infrastructure] influence citizens’ [[Perception of (in)security|perception]] of the [[risk]], that this infrastructure is at, as well as the general [[Critical_infrastructure#Criticality_of_infastructure|perception of criticality]] of that infrastructure.
+* Design features of urban [http://www.focusproject.eu/web/focus/wiki/-/wiki/ESG/Infrastructure infrastructure] influence citizens’ [[Perception of (in)security|perception]] of the [[risk]], that this infrastructure is at, as well as the general [[Critical_infrastructure#Criticality_of_infastructure|perception of criticality]] of that infrastructure.
 * Critics: Urbanization studies strongly argue that differences between actual and perceived security are not influenced by the design of built environment but that they mainly are mass media constructs. The perception of (in)security in cities rather depends "[...] ''upon the substantial amount and constant flow of information that urban residents receive from many sources''”<ref>United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Enhancing urban safety and security. London: Earthscan, 2007, p. 19. Online: http://books.google.at/books?id=SmsbwAtSfE0C&pg=PA205&dq=legal+aspects+in+urban+planning+security&hl=de&ei=m-WzTu-tLMbQ4QST4vjQAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=legal%20aspects%20in%20urban%20planning%20security&f=false </ref>.
 * Many examples of community-enhancing constructions represent an “''elitism of architectural choice''”<ref>M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 331.</ref> that may in the end increase societal gaps and perceptions of fear, as well as actual insecurity.

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 ==Security aspects==
-* Design features of urban [[http://www.focusproject.eu/web/focus/wiki/-/wiki/ESG/Infrastructure|infrastructure]] influence citizens’ [[Perception of (in)security|perception]] of the [[risk]], that this infrastructure is at, as well as the general [[Critical_infrastructure#Criticality_of_infastructure|perception of criticality]] of that infrastructure.
+* Design features of urban [http://www.focusproject.eu/web/focus/wiki/-/wiki/ESG/Infrastructure|infrastructure] influence citizens’ [[Perception of (in)security|perception]] of the [[risk]], that this infrastructure is at, as well as the general [[Critical_infrastructure#Criticality_of_infastructure|perception of criticality]] of that infrastructure.
 * Critics: Urbanization studies strongly argue that differences between actual and perceived security are not influenced by the design of built environment but that they mainly are mass media constructs. The perception of (in)security in cities rather depends "[...] ''upon the substantial amount and constant flow of information that urban residents receive from many sources''”<ref>United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT): Enhancing urban safety and security. London: Earthscan, 2007, p. 19. Online: http://books.google.at/books?id=SmsbwAtSfE0C&pg=PA205&dq=legal+aspects+in+urban+planning+security&hl=de&ei=m-WzTu-tLMbQ4QST4vjQAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=legal%20aspects%20in%20urban%20planning%20security&f=false </ref>.
 * Many examples of community-enhancing constructions represent an “''elitism of architectural choice''”<ref>M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 331.</ref> that may in the end increase societal gaps and perceptions of fear, as well as actual insecurity.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Category:Social]]
 [[File:ae.png|25px|right|This is a page providing background in a specific field of expertise]]
-The '''socio-spatial perspective''' in urbanism research addresses how ''built'' social infrastructure and ''society'' interact. It assumes that "social space operates as both a product and a producer of changes in the metropolitan environment"<ref>M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 394; see also p. 20.</ref>.
+The '''socio-spatial perspective''' in urbanism research addresses how ''built infrastructure'' and ''society'' interact. It assumes that "social space operates as both a product and a producer of changes in the metropolitan environment"<ref>M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 394; see also p. 20.</ref>.
 In the socio-spatial perspective, built environment is intrinsically meaningful, it has its particular “semiotics” that tell about policy, culture, society, economy, etc., and also about security.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Category:Social]]
 The '''socio-spatial perspective''' in urbanism research addresses how ''built'' social infrastructure and ''society'' interact. It assumes that "social space operates as both a product and a producer of changes in the metropolitan environment"<ref>M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 394; see also p. 20.</ref>.
@@ Line 31: / Line 30: @@
 {{references}}
-<websiteFrame>
-website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Sociospatial perspective
-height=1023
-width=100%
-border=0
-scroll=auto
-align=middle
-</websiteFrame>
-<headertabs/>

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ={{PAGENAME}}=
-The '''socio-spatial perspective''' in urbanism research addresses how ''built'' social infrastructure and ''society'' interact. It assumes that “''social space operates as both a product and a producer of changes in the metropolitan environment''”<ref>M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 394; see also p. 20.</ref>.
+The '''socio-spatial perspective''' in urbanism research addresses how ''built'' social infrastructure and ''society'' interact. It assumes that "social space operates as both a product and a producer of changes in the metropolitan environment"<ref>M. Gottdiener/R. Hutchison: The New Urban Sociology. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Gottdiener/Hutchinson, 2011, p. 394; see also p. 20.</ref>.
 In the socio-spatial perspective, built environment is intrinsically meaningful, it has its particular “semiotics” that tell about policy, culture, society, economy, etc., and also about security.