Neosocratic Dialogue - Revision history

Florian at 08:32, 18 June 2013

2013-06-18T08:32:26Z

Florian at 13:06, 13 June 2013

2013-06-13T13:06:57Z

Florian at 13:05, 13 June 2013

2013-06-13T13:05:37Z

Florian at 10:35, 5 February 2013

2013-02-05T10:35:40Z

Florian at 09:48, 5 February 2013

2013-02-05T09:48:33Z

Albert at 23:05, 30 January 2013

2013-01-30T23:05:06Z

Albert at 23:04, 30 January 2013

2013-01-30T23:04:40Z

Albert: Text replace - "website=(.*)" to ""

2013-01-30T20:04:26Z

Text replace - "website=(.*)" to ""

Albert: Text replace - "(.*)" to ""

2013-01-30T18:32:32Z

Text replace - "<websiteFrame>(.*)" to ""

Albert: Text replace - "= MAP =" to ""

2013-01-30T16:30:21Z

Text replace - "= MAP =" to ""

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ==Process description==
-A question central to the topic to be dealt with is put as clearly and simply as possible. Next, instances of the participants’ actual experience are gathered.
+A question central to the topic to be dealt with is put as clearly and simply as possible. In the next step, instances of the participants’ actual experience are gathered.
 The topic is put as a central question in a clear and simple manner. The participants’ share their experiences; and an example is selected for further analysis and argumentation. Assumptions, arguments and perspectives are highlighted.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 The Neosocratic Dialogue is an instrument for involving ordinary citizens in discussions on ethical-philosophical questions on a very general and basic level. Assumptions, reasons and points of view are “held up to the light”.
-Neo-socratic methods are recommended for the clarification of controversial questions, for developing a common understanding of basic terms and approaches, and for discussing basic topics such as principles, values, and attitudes.<ref>Gronke Horst (2002): Increasing Public Involvement in Debates on Ethical Questions of Xenotransplantation. Guidebook: Neo Socratic Dialogue. Projektbericht/Research Report. Studie im Auftrag der Europäischen Kommission (Research Directorate-General). Institute of Advanced Studies (IHS) Freie Universität Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.ihs.ac.at/departments/soc/xeno-pta/xeno_gronke.pdf [2012-04-12].</ref>
+Neo-socratic methods are recommended for the clarification of controversial questions, for developing a common understanding of basic terms and approaches, and for discussing basic topics such as principles, values, and attitudes.<ref>Gronke Horst : Increasing Public Involvement in Debates on Ethical Questions of Xenotransplantation. Guidebook: Neo Socratic Dialogue. Projektbericht/Research Report. Studie im Auftrag der Europäischen Kommission (Research Directorate-General). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, Institute of Advanced Studies (IHS), 2002. Retrieved from http://www.ihs.ac.at/departments/soc/xeno-pta/xeno_gronke.pdf [last access: 2012-04-12].</ref>
 ==Process description==

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 [[Category:Social]]
-'''Neosocratic dialogue''' a is [[citizen participation]] method to determine [[ethics aspects]] in planning of public spaces.
+'''Neosocratic Dialogue''' is a [[citizen participation]] method to determine [[ethics aspects]] in planning of public spaces.
 ==Description==
-The Neosocratic dialogue is an instrument for involving ordinary citizens in discussions on ethical-philosophical questions on a very general and basic level. Assumptions, reasons and points of view are “held up to the light”.
+The Neosocratic Dialogue is an instrument for involving ordinary citizens in discussions on ethical-philosophical questions on a very general and basic level. Assumptions, reasons and points of view are “held up to the light”.
-Neo-socratic methods are recommended for the clarification of controversial questions, for developing a common understanding of basic terms and approaches, and for discussing basic topics such as principles, values and attitudes.<ref>Gronke Horst (2002): Increasing Public Involvement in Debates on Ethical Questions of Xenotransplantation. Guidebook: Neo Socratic Dialogue. Projektbericht/Research Report. Studie im Auftrag der Europäischen Kommission (Research Directorate-General). Institute of Advanced Studies (IHS) Freie Universität Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.ihs.ac.at/departments/soc/xeno-pta/xeno_gronke.pdf [2012-04-12].</ref>
+Neo-socratic methods are recommended for the clarification of controversial questions, for developing a common understanding of basic terms and approaches, and for discussing basic topics such as principles, values, and attitudes.<ref>Gronke Horst (2002): Increasing Public Involvement in Debates on Ethical Questions of Xenotransplantation. Guidebook: Neo Socratic Dialogue. Projektbericht/Research Report. Studie im Auftrag der Europäischen Kommission (Research Directorate-General). Institute of Advanced Studies (IHS) Freie Universität Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.ihs.ac.at/departments/soc/xeno-pta/xeno_gronke.pdf [2012-04-12].</ref>
 ==Process description==
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 ==How does it support in planning of secure public spaces?==
 The Neosocratic Dialogue is not suitable for general planning assignments. However, the method is useful in:
-* assessing the impact of new (security) technologies and public space designs;
+* Assessing the impact of new (security) technologies and public space designs;
-* gathering information on ethics aspects of security solutions in urban planning;
+* Gathering information on ethics aspects of security solutions in urban planning;
-* getting insights into citizens [[Perception of (in)security and risks|perceptions]] and acceptance of security solutions.
+* Getting insights into citizens [[Perception of (in)security and risks|perceptions]] and acceptance of security solutions.
 ==Links and further reading==
-*Participation & sustainable development in Europe: URL: http://www.partizipation.at/neosocr-dialogue.html [2012-08-16].
+*Participation & Sustainable Development in Europe. Retrieved from: http://www.partizipation.at/neosocr-dialogue.html [last access: 2012-08-16].
-*Littig B. (2002): The Neo-Socratic Dialogue (NSD): a method of teaching the ethics of sustainable development. Institute for Advanced Studies, Dep. of Sociology, Vienna. URL: http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/541/ssoar-2004-littig-the_neo-socratic_dialogue_nsd_a.pdf?sequence=1 [2012-10-22].
+*Littig B.: The Neo-Socratic Dialogue (NSD): a method of teaching the ethics of sustainable development. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies, Dep. of Sociology, 2002. Retrieved from: http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/541/ssoar-2004-littig-the_neo-socratic_dialogue_nsd_a.pdf?sequence=1 [last access: 2012-10-22].
 {{references}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Category:Ethics]]
 [[Category:Social]]
-[[File:t.png|25px|right|This page provides information about content and use of the Vitruv tools]]
 '''Neosocratic dialogue''' a is [[citizen participation]] method to determine [[ethics aspects]] in planning of public spaces.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Category:Ethics]]
 [[Category:Social]]
+[[File:t.png|25px|right|This page provides information about content and use of the Vitruv tools]]
-The '''Neosocratic dialogue''' a is [[citizen participation]] method to determine [[ethics aspects]] in planning of public spaces.
+'''Neosocratic dialogue''' a is [[citizen participation]] method to determine [[ethics aspects]] in planning of public spaces.
 ==Description==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Category:Ethics]]
 [[Category:Social]]
+The '''Neosocratic dialogue''' a is [[citizen participation]] method to determine [[ethics aspects]] in planning of public spaces.
+==Description==
-The '''Neosocratic dialogue''' a is [[citizen participation]] method to determine [[ethics aspects]] in planning of public spaces. It is an instrument for involving ordinary citizens in discussions on ethical-philosophical questions on a very general and basic level. Assumptions, reasons and points of view are “held up to the light”.
+It is an instrument for involving ordinary citizens in discussions on ethical-philosophical questions on a very general and basic level. Assumptions, reasons and points of view are “held up to the light”.
 Neo-socratic methods are recommended for the clarification of controversial questions, for developing a common understanding of basic terms and approaches, and for discussing basic topics such as principles, values and attitudes.<ref>Gronke Horst (2002): Increasing Public Involvement in Debates on Ethical Questions of Xenotransplantation. Guidebook: Neo Socratic Dialogue. Projektbericht/Research Report. Studie im Auftrag der Europäischen Kommission (Research Directorate-General). Institute of Advanced Studies (IHS) Freie Universität Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.ihs.ac.at/departments/soc/xeno-pta/xeno_gronke.pdf [2012-04-12].</ref>
@@ Line 24: / Line 26: @@
 {{references}}
-http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Neosocratic_Dialogue
-height=1023
-width=100%
-border=0
-scroll=auto
-align=middle
-</websiteFrame>
-<headertabs/>

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
-<websiteFrame>
 website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?wiki=securipedia.eu&concept=Neosocratic_Dialogue
 height=1023