Detail level tools - Revision history

Albert at 10:26, 1 February 2017

2017-02-01T10:26:15Z

Albert: /* Goal of the Detail level tool */

2013-04-23T14:48:56Z

Goal of the Detail level tool

Albert: /* Goal of the Detail level tool */

2013-04-23T14:48:36Z

Goal of the Detail level tool

Albert: /* Goal of the Detail level tool */

2013-04-23T14:48:14Z

Goal of the Detail level tool

Albert at 14:45, 23 April 2013

2013-04-23T14:45:22Z

Albert: /* Goal of the Detail level tool */

2013-04-23T14:43:15Z

Goal of the Detail level tool

Albert at 23:38, 30 January 2013

2013-01-30T23:38:42Z

Albert at 16:29, 30 January 2013

2013-01-30T16:29:02Z

Albert at 16:28, 30 January 2013

2013-01-30T16:28:29Z

Albert: Text replace - "= {{PAGENAME}} =" to ""

2013-01-30T15:27:35Z

Text replace - "= {{PAGENAME}} =" to ""

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:26, 1 February 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:

	[[File:t.png\|25px\|right\|This page provides information about content and use of the Vitruv tools]]The '''Detail level tool''' is the tool provided in the project ~~[http://www.vitruv-project.eu/~~ VITRUV] to support the final of three stages distinguished in the process of urban planning.		[[File:t.png\|25px\|right\|This page provides information about content and use of the Vitruv tools]]The '''Detail level tool''' is the tool provided in the project VITRUV to support the final of three stages distinguished in the process of urban planning.

	== Three planning stages ==		== Three planning stages ==

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 == Goal of the Detail level tool ==
-The Concept and Plan level tools include results for the guidance concerning risk assessment and an analysis concerning the susceptibility of targets in an urban area. In a next step the Detail level tool is used to examine the effects of the threats that are identified during the plan level analysis. This examination will be carried out with a vulnerability analysis.
+[[Image:Detail level tool_Building 3D.png|thumb|right|300px|Graphical representation of 3D structure used for analysis]]The Concept and Plan level tools include results for the guidance concerning risk assessment and an analysis concerning the susceptibility of targets in an urban area. In a next step the Detail level tool is used to examine the effects of the threats that are identified during the plan level analysis. This examination will be carried out with a vulnerability analysis.
 After the empirical risk analysis in the plan level the detail level tool includes algorithms for a quantitative risk assessment. The vulnerability is a measure for consequences raised from possible events. The vulnerability can be related to the local measures of
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 * average risk.
-[[Image:Detail level tool_Building 3D.png|thumb|right|300px|Graphical representation of 3D structure used for analysis]]
 The threats and the involved scenarios are determined during the plan level analysis. The consequences of considered threats can be calculated for persons and buildings. For the prediction of injury to humans simplified injury models are used<ref>H. Axelsson, J Yelverton, ''Chest wall velocity as a predictor on nonauditory blast injury in a complex wave environment'', Journal of Trauma: Injury, Invection, and Critical Care, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 31-37, 1996</ref><ref>I. Bowen, E. Fletcher, D. Richmong, ''Estimate of man’s tolerance to direct effects of air blast'', Headquarters Defense Atomic Support Agency, 1968</ref>. For the assessment of building damage, in a first step the response of structural members due to external loading is evaluated. The tools on plan and detail level have the criterion to be a fast running PC based application. Hence for the assessment of the structural response simplified engineering models are used. Single degree of freedom (SDOF) models are common practice to evaluate such nonlinear loading cases<ref>K. Fischer, I. Häring, ''SDOF response model parameters from dynamic blast loading experiments'', Engineering Structures 31(8), pp. 1677-1686, 2009</ref><ref>C. Morison, ''Dynamic response of walls and slabs by single-degree-of-freedom analysis – a critical review and revision'', International Journal of Impact Engineering 32(8), pp. 1215-1247, 2005</ref><ref>W. Riedel, K. Fischer, et.al., ''Modeling and validation of a wall-window retrofit system under blast loading'', Engineering Structures 37, pp 235-245, 2012</ref>.

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 The threats and the involved scenarios are determined during the plan level analysis. The consequences of considered threats can be calculated for persons and buildings. For the prediction of injury to humans simplified injury models are used<ref>H. Axelsson, J Yelverton, ''Chest wall velocity as a predictor on nonauditory blast injury in a complex wave environment'', Journal of Trauma: Injury, Invection, and Critical Care, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 31-37, 1996</ref><ref>I. Bowen, E. Fletcher, D. Richmong, ''Estimate of man’s tolerance to direct effects of air blast'', Headquarters Defense Atomic Support Agency, 1968</ref>. For the assessment of building damage, in a first step the response of structural members due to external loading is evaluated. The tools on plan and detail level have the criterion to be a fast running PC based application. Hence for the assessment of the structural response simplified engineering models are used. Single degree of freedom (SDOF) models are common practice to evaluate such nonlinear loading cases<ref>K. Fischer, I. Häring, ''SDOF response model parameters from dynamic blast loading experiments'', Engineering Structures 31(8), pp. 1677-1686, 2009</ref><ref>C. Morison, ''Dynamic response of walls and slabs by single-degree-of-freedom analysis – a critical review and revision'', International Journal of Impact Engineering 32(8), pp. 1215-1247, 2005</ref><ref>W. Riedel, K. Fischer, et.al., ''Modeling and validation of a wall-window retrofit system under blast loading'', Engineering Structures 37, pp 235-245, 2012</ref>.
-[[Image:Building collapse anlysis.png|Thumb|right|300px|Graphical representation of the calculated damage resulting from a blast]]After the assessment of the initial failure the overall structural response of the building is evaluated with a progressive collapse analysis. As basis for the whole building response assessment pre-defined building types were analysed during a pre-study. After the risk assessment possible enhancement measures could be considered to get lower values concerning the quantitative risk.
+[[Image:Building collapse anlysis.png|thumb|right|300px|Graphical representation of the calculated damage resulting from a blast]]After the assessment of the initial failure the overall structural response of the building is evaluated with a progressive collapse analysis. As basis for the whole building response assessment pre-defined building types were analysed during a pre-study. After the risk assessment possible enhancement measures could be considered to get lower values concerning the quantitative risk.
 For this structural damage assessment more detailed information of the components are used, which are only available on detail level. Building costs and personal density are implemented to calculate lethality respectively structural damage and hence the derived risk for persons and buildings. These results are used for mapping the risks in a 3D visualisation of the urban area. In a next step security measures can be used to minimize the risk. The visualisation of detail level occurs also in the same user-friendly Graphical User Interface (GUI) of the plan level tool.

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 * average risk.
+[[Image:Detail level tool_Building 3D.png|thumb|right|300px|Graphical representation of 3D structure used for analysis]]
 The threats and the involved scenarios are determined during the plan level analysis. The consequences of considered threats can be calculated for persons and buildings. For the prediction of injury to humans simplified injury models are used<ref>H. Axelsson, J Yelverton, ''Chest wall velocity as a predictor on nonauditory blast injury in a complex wave environment'', Journal of Trauma: Injury, Invection, and Critical Care, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 31-37, 1996</ref><ref>I. Bowen, E. Fletcher, D. Richmong, ''Estimate of man’s tolerance to direct effects of air blast'', Headquarters Defense Atomic Support Agency, 1968</ref>. For the assessment of building damage, in a first step the response of structural members due to external loading is evaluated. The tools on plan and detail level have the criterion to be a fast running PC based application. Hence for the assessment of the structural response simplified engineering models are used. Single degree of freedom (SDOF) models are common practice to evaluate such nonlinear loading cases<ref>K. Fischer, I. Häring, ''SDOF response model parameters from dynamic blast loading experiments'', Engineering Structures 31(8), pp. 1677-1686, 2009</ref><ref>C. Morison, ''Dynamic response of walls and slabs by single-degree-of-freedom analysis – a critical review and revision'', International Journal of Impact Engineering 32(8), pp. 1215-1247, 2005</ref><ref>W. Riedel, K. Fischer, et.al., ''Modeling and validation of a wall-window retrofit system under blast loading'', Engineering Structures 37, pp 235-245, 2012</ref>.
-After the assessment of the initial failure the overall structural response of the building is evaluated with a progressive collapse analysis. As basis for the whole building response assessment pre-defined building types were analysed during a pre-study. After the risk assessment possible enhancement measures could be considered to get lower values concerning the quantitative risk.
+[[Image:Building collapse anlysis.png|Thumb|right|300px|Graphical representation of the calculated damage resulting from a blast]]After the assessment of the initial failure the overall structural response of the building is evaluated with a progressive collapse analysis. As basis for the whole building response assessment pre-defined building types were analysed during a pre-study. After the risk assessment possible enhancement measures could be considered to get lower values concerning the quantitative risk.
 For this structural damage assessment more detailed information of the components are used, which are only available on detail level. Building costs and personal density are implemented to calculate lethality respectively structural damage and hence the derived risk for persons and buildings. These results are used for mapping the risks in a 3D visualisation of the urban area. In a next step security measures can be used to minimize the risk. The visualisation of detail level occurs also in the same user-friendly Graphical User Interface (GUI) of the plan level tool.
-[[Image:Detail level tool_Building 3D.png|350px|]]
-[[Image:Building collapse anlysis.png|300px|]]
 {{references}}

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 * average risk.
-The threats and the involved scenarios are determined during the plan level analysis. The consequences of considered threats can be calculated for persons and buildings. For the prediction of injury to humans simplified injury models are used<ref>H. Axelsson, J Yelverton, ''Chest wall velocity as a predictor on nonauditory blast injury in a complex wave environment'', Journal of Trauma: Injury, Invection, and Critical Care, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 31-37, 1996</ref><ref>I. Bowen, E. Fletcher, D. Richmong, ''Estimate of man’s tolerance to direct effects of air blast'', Headquarters Defense Atomic Support Agency, 1968</ref>. For the assessment of building damage, in a first step the response of structural members due to external loading is evaluated. The tools on plan and detail level have the criterion to be a fast running PC based application. Hence for the assessment of the structural response simplified engineering models are used. Single degree of freedom (SDOF) models are common practice to evaluate such nonlinear loading cases. After the assessment of the initial failure the overall structural response of the building is evaluated with a progressive collapse analysis. As basis for the whole building response assessment pre-defined building types were analysed during a pre-study. After the risk assessment possible enhancement measures could be considered to get lower values concerning the quantitative risk.
+The threats and the involved scenarios are determined during the plan level analysis. The consequences of considered threats can be calculated for persons and buildings. For the prediction of injury to humans simplified injury models are used<ref>H. Axelsson, J Yelverton, ''Chest wall velocity as a predictor on nonauditory blast injury in a complex wave environment'', Journal of Trauma: Injury, Invection, and Critical Care, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 31-37, 1996</ref><ref>I. Bowen, E. Fletcher, D. Richmong, ''Estimate of man’s tolerance to direct effects of air blast'', Headquarters Defense Atomic Support Agency, 1968</ref>. For the assessment of building damage, in a first step the response of structural members due to external loading is evaluated. The tools on plan and detail level have the criterion to be a fast running PC based application. Hence for the assessment of the structural response simplified engineering models are used. Single degree of freedom (SDOF) models are common practice to evaluate such nonlinear loading cases<ref>K. Fischer, I. Häring, ''SDOF response model parameters from dynamic blast loading experiments'', Engineering Structures 31(8), pp. 1677-1686, 2009</ref><ref>C. Morison, ''Dynamic response of walls and slabs by single-degree-of-freedom analysis – a critical review and revision'', International Journal of Impact Engineering 32(8), pp. 1215-1247, 2005</ref><ref>W. Riedel, K. Fischer, et.al., ''Modeling and validation of a wall-window retrofit system under blast loading'', Engineering Structures 37, pp 235-245, 2012</ref>.
+After the assessment of the initial failure the overall structural response of the building is evaluated with a progressive collapse analysis. As basis for the whole building response assessment pre-defined building types were analysed during a pre-study. After the risk assessment possible enhancement measures could be considered to get lower values concerning the quantitative risk.
 For this structural damage assessment more detailed information of the components are used, which are only available on detail level. Building costs and personal density are implemented to calculate lethality respectively structural damage and hence the derived risk for persons and buildings. These results are used for mapping the risks in a 3D visualisation of the urban area. In a next step security measures can be used to minimize the risk. The visualisation of detail level occurs also in the same user-friendly Graphical User Interface (GUI) of the plan level tool.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 == Goal of the Detail level tool ==
+The Concept and Plan level tools include results for the guidance concerning risk assessment and an analysis concerning the susceptibility of targets in an urban area. In a next step the Detail level tool is used to examine the effects of the threats that are identified during the plan level analysis. This examination will be carried out with a vulnerability analysis.
-# Quantitative risk assessment, vulnerability analysis
-# Plan level: scenario definition... Detail level: impact of the scenarios
+After the empirical risk analysis in the plan level the detail level tool includes algorithms for a quantitative risk assessment. The vulnerability is a measure for consequences raised from possible events. The vulnerability can be related to the local measures of
-# Physical hazard in case of an attack
-# Damage in case of an attack
+* average physical hazard in case of an attack,
+* average damage in case of an attack, and
-# Average risk for humans and buildings
+* average risk.
-# Engineering models for calculation
-# Results are used for mapping the risk
+The threats and the involved scenarios are determined during the plan level analysis. The consequences of considered threats can be calculated for persons and buildings. For the prediction of injury to humans simplified injury models are used<ref>H. Axelsson, J Yelverton, ''Chest wall velocity as a predictor on nonauditory blast injury in a complex wave environment'', Journal of Trauma: Injury, Invection, and Critical Care, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 31-37, 1996</ref><ref>I. Bowen, E. Fletcher, D. Richmong, ''Estimate of man’s tolerance to direct effects of air blast'', Headquarters Defense Atomic Support Agency, 1968</ref>. For the assessment of building damage, in a first step the response of structural members due to external loading is evaluated. The tools on plan and detail level have the criterion to be a fast running PC based application. Hence for the assessment of the structural response simplified engineering models are used. Single degree of freedom (SDOF) models are common practice to evaluate such nonlinear loading cases. After the assessment of the initial failure the overall structural response of the building is evaluated with a progressive collapse analysis. As basis for the whole building response assessment pre-defined building types were analysed during a pre-study. After the risk assessment possible enhancement measures could be considered to get lower values concerning the quantitative risk.
+For this structural damage assessment more detailed information of the components are used, which are only available on detail level. Building costs and personal density are implemented to calculate lethality respectively structural damage and hence the derived risk for persons and buildings. These results are used for mapping the risks in a 3D visualisation of the urban area. In a next step security measures can be used to minimize the risk. The visualisation of detail level occurs also in the same user-friendly Graphical User Interface (GUI) of the plan level tool.
 [[Image:Detail level tool_Building 3D.png|350px|]]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 # Results are used for mapping the risk
-[[Image:Detail level tool_Building 3D.png|thumb|left|350px|]]
+[[Image:Detail level tool_Building 3D.png|left|350px|]]
-[[Image:Building collapse anlysis.png|thumb|right|300px|]]
+[[Image:Building collapse anlysis.png|right|300px|]]
 {{references}}

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 {{references}}
-= MAP =
-<websiteFrame>
-website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?concept=<replace with pagename>
-width=100%
-border=0
-scroll=auto
-align=middle
-</websiteFrame>
-<headertabs/>

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:27, 30 January 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:

	= {{PAGENAME}} =
	[[File:t.png\|25px\|right\|This page provides information about content and use of the Vitruv tools]]The '''Detail level tool''' is the tool provided in the project [http://www.vitruv-project.eu/ VITRUV] to support the final of three stages distinguished in the process of urban planning.		[[File:t.png\|25px\|right\|This page provides information about content and use of the Vitruv tools]]The '''Detail level tool''' is the tool provided in the project [http://www.vitruv-project.eu/ VITRUV] to support the final of three stages distinguished in the process of urban planning.