Designing in - Revision history

Albert at 16:28, 30 January 2013

2013-01-30T16:28:06Z

2013-01-30T15:27:35Z

Text replace - "= {{PAGENAME}} =" to ""

2012-12-07T09:46:12Z

2012-12-07T09:22:57Z

Text replace - " " to " "

2012-10-25T10:35:03Z

2012-10-25T10:33:05Z

Text replace - "concept=Risk" to "concept=<replace with pagename>"

2012-10-24T07:47:27Z

2012-10-15T11:39:49Z

Text replace - " " to " "

2012-10-11T09:35:58Z

2012-10-11T09:21:42Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Category:Safety]][[Category:Social]][[Category:Ethics]][[Category:Measure]]
 In contrast to [["designing out" approach|designing out]], '''designing in''' concepts have become central in planning development. They focus on an '''inclusive, [[Citizen participation|participatory]]''' planning process in/for multicultural metropolitan environment(s) (cf. Ameyaw 2000) <ref>Ameyaw, S. (2000): Appreciative Planning: An Approach to Planning with Diverse Ethnic and Cultural Groups. In: Burayidi, M. A. (ed.): Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society. Westport, CT: Praeger, 101-114.</ref>; (see also “[[appreciative planning]]”).
@@ Line 35: / Line 33: @@
 {{references}}
-= MAP =
-<websiteFrame>
-website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?concept=Designing in
-width=100%
-border=0
-scroll=auto
-align=middle
-</websiteFrame>
-<headertabs/>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Category:Safety]][[Category:Social]][[Category:Ethics]][[Category:Measure]]
-= {{PAGENAME}} =
 In contrast to [["designing out" approach|designing out]], '''designing in''' concepts have become central in planning development. They focus on an '''inclusive, [[Citizen participation|participatory]]''' planning process in/for multicultural metropolitan environment(s) (cf. Ameyaw 2000) <ref>Ameyaw, S. (2000): Appreciative Planning: An Approach to Planning with Diverse Ethnic and Cultural Groups. In: Burayidi, M. A. (ed.): Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society. Westport, CT: Praeger, 101-114.</ref>; (see also “[[appreciative planning]]”).

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 = {{PAGENAME}} =
 In contrast to [["designing out" approach|designing out]], '''designing in''' concepts have become central in planning development. They focus on an '''inclusive, [[Citizen participation|participatory]]''' planning process in/for multicultural metropolitan environment(s) (cf. Ameyaw 2000) <ref>Ameyaw, S. (2000): Appreciative Planning: An Approach to Planning with Diverse Ethnic and Cultural Groups. In: Burayidi, M. A. (ed.): Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society. Westport, CT: Praeger, 101-114.</ref>; (see also “[[appreciative planning]]”).
@@ Line 46: / Line 45: @@
 align=middle
 </websiteFrame>
 <headertabs/>

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 *Counter-terrorism good design is considered to include risk response and integrating protective security measures.
 *Design principles should be considered as early as possible in planning and development processes and are promoted by the government.
 {{references}}

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 <websiteFrame>
-website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?concept=<replace with pagename>
+website=http://securipedia.eu/cool/index.php?concept=Designing in
 width=100%
 border=0

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:47, 24 October 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Category:Safety]][[Category:Social]][[Category:~~Ethical~~]][[Category:Measure]]		[[Category:Safety]][[Category:Social]][[Category:Ethics]][[Category:Measure]]

	= {{PAGENAME}} =		= {{PAGENAME}} =

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 *Including social security measures;
 *Including emergency management considerations.
 ==Security related aspects and benefits==
@@ Line 35: / Line 34: @@
 *Counter-terrorism good design is considered to include risk response and integrating protective security measures.
 *Design principles should be considered as early as possible in planning and development processes and are promoted by the government.

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
+==Security related aspects and benefits==
-==Benefits for urban security==
 *Design can impact (criminal/terrorist) behaviour in a positive way.
 *Designing in reduces criminal, terrorist and anti-social behaviour.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 *Including citizens and multicultural/ethical groups in the planning process and as user target groups;
 *Including structural/physical security measures;
-*Including social security measures:
+*Including social security measures;
 *Including emergency management considerations.
+==Benefits for urban security==
+*Design can impact (criminal/terrorist) behaviour in a positive way.
+*Designing in reduces criminal, terrorist and anti-social behaviour.
+*Designing in can mitigate, lessen or even prohibit criminal or terrorist acts.
+*Designing in decreases vulnerability and increases resilience.
+==Approaches how to address it==
+*Consider designing in principles;
+*Get familiar with inclusive, participatory planning processes;
+*Get familiar with general design aspects and structural/material aspects;
+*Get familiar with social security measures;
+*Integrate considerations on response and emergency measures in the planning process.
 ==UK-example: Designing in community safety==