Ethics aspects

" The field of ethics (or moral philosophy) involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behaviour." An urban planning system that comprehensively gathers and considers security information is one that enables a society to address the causes of security problems, not just their symptoms, in order to address ethics issues in terms both of rights and of responsibilities that a planning system must be based on. However, decisions about how to configure and live within the built environment have ethics dimensions that are sometimes hard to see.

Ethics of urban planning

 * It is the duty of planners to ensure that political goals for building development and the provision of public service are implemented without being influenced by pressure by special interests and by their superiors.
 * The primary obligation of urban planners is to serve the public interests and recognise the comprehensive and long-range nature of planning decisions.
 * Planners should avoid conflict of interests and not seek or offer other favours and benefits.
 * Respecting the professional code of ethics includes maintaining the public confidence through not using confidential information for financial gain.

The public interest is a question of continuous debate. Both in its general principles and in case-by-case applications, it requires a conscientiously held view of the policies and actions that best serve the entire community.

Ethics pyramid
The challenge to implement ethics aspects in security-related urban planning decisions is illustrated in the form of the “ethical planning pyramid” (Brucelius s.a.).

"Generic" ethics aspects
In addressing of security issues, generic ethics aspects lead to questions such as the following:


 * How was the project chosen?
 * Are the goals of the project worth reaching?
 * Are the means used to reach the goals of the project appropriate?
 * Does the project conflict with projects other individuals or groups are pursuing?
 * Is the project self-defeating?

Ethics dimensions of built environment
Decisions about how to configure and live within the built environment have ethics dimensions that are not always obvious. In order to provide practical guidance on ethics implications of metropolitan growth, questions relating to well-being, justice, sustainability and legitimacy should be considered. Key questions of environmental ethics that bring in the most immediate concerns of ordinary people include the following:


 * Is the selected place a good place to live? (Well-being)
 * Who gets to benefit from that place, and who does not? (Justice)
 * How long can the place last? (Sustainability)
 * Who should make decisions about the place? (Legitimacy)

Practical checklists and methods

 * Checklist on culture, legal and ethics aspects of addressing security issues in urban planning.
 * Stakeholder-rated methods to consider ethics aspects in urban planning
 * Determination of security aspects - methods for urban planners

American Planning Association (APA) ethics principles
The American Planning Association (APA), a not-for-profit educational organisation with various contributions in community planning, developed a guide to ethics conduct for all who participate in the process of planning as advisers, advocates and decision makers. The set of principles for all who participate in the process of planning accentuate the necessity for the highest standards of fairness and honesty among all participants and guide all who aspire to professionalism.

These ethics principles derive both from the general values of society and from the planner's special responsibility to serve the public interest. In order to faithfully serve the public interest, planning participants should have the following characteristics:


 * Recognise the rights of citizens to participate in planning decisions;
 * Facilitate citizens involvement and active participation and full, clear and accurate information on planning issues;
 * Strive for fair, honest and independent judgement from decision makers and advisers;
 * Clarify community goals, objectives and policies in plan-making;
 * Protect the integrity of the natural environment and the heritage of the built environment;
 * Pay attention to the long range consequences of present actions;
 * Consider “personal interest” of all participants (citizens);
 * Abstain completely from decision maker’s personal interests, influencing gifts or favours;
 * Do not participate as an advisor or decision maker on any plan or project in which they have previously participated as an advocate and vice versa;
 * Serve as advocates only when the client's objectives are legal and consistent with the public interest;
 * Do not misuse confidential information and not misrepresent facts or distort information for the purpose of achieving a desired outcome;
 * Respect the rights of all persons (according to civil rights laws and regulations);
 * Consider gender perspectives, perceptions and needs.

Citizen participation and acceptance
There are different cultural approaches to decision making in urban planning, and citizen participation can be realised in several ways. Citizen involvement in urban planning processes contributes to increase security by:


 * Reducing inequality and social tension;
 * Incorporating the knowledge, productivity, social and physical capital of the poor in city development;
 * Increasing local ownership of development processes and programs.

Closer matching and balancing of planning with local needs by involving citizens and stakeholders enhances broader citizen acceptance of security decisions and the implementation of security technologies. Public acceptance is recognized as an important issue in security and urban planning policies and mirrors trust in political decisions and actors. The United Nations Human Settlements Programme(UN-HABITAT) Guide for Municipalities gives a resume of various types of citizen participation for use in urban planning consultation processes.